490
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Emergence of a potentialising organisation in University self-governance: temporalisations in strategies

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agasisti, T., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2008). Strategic management accounting in universities: The Italian experience. Higher Education, 55(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9032-6
  • Ahonen, P. (2016). Rhetorical topoi of academic ideology: Examining university strategies in the northeastern European extreme of the humboldtian tradition. In E. A. Samier (Ed.), Ideologies in educational administration and leadership (pp. 176–192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661155
  • Åkerstrøm Andersen, N. (2020). Potentialization: Loosening up relations between public organizations and societal function systems. Management & Organizational History, 15(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2020.1815548
  • Åkerstrøm Andersen, N., & Grønbæk Pors, J. (2016). Public management in transition: The orchestration of potentiality. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t8940n
  • Åkerstrøm Andersen, N., & Grønbæk Pors, J. (2017). On the history of the form of administrative decisions: How decisions begin to desire uncertainty. Management & Organizational History, 12(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2017.1324800
  • Baecker, D. (2010). A systems primer on universities. Soziale Systeme, 16(2), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1865626
  • Baraldi, C., Corsi, G., & Esposito, E. (2021). Meaning dimensions (Sinndimensionen). In C. Baraldi, G. Corsi, & E. Esposito (Eds.), Unlocking Luhmann: A keyword introduction to systems theory (pp. 141–144). Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839456743
  • Besio, C., & Pronzini, A. (2011). Inside organizations and out: Methodological tenets for empirical research inspired by systems theory. Historical Social Research, 36(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.1.18-41
  • Bleiklie, I. (2018). New public management or neoliberalism, higher education. In P. N. Teixeira & J.-C. Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_143-1
  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2015). Organizations as penetrated hierarchies: Environmental pressures and control in professional organizations. Organization Studies, 36(7), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571960
  • Brans, M., & Rossbach, S. (1997). The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy. Public Administration, 75(3), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00068
  • Buchinger, E. (2007). Applying Luhmann to conceptualize public governance of autopoietic organizations. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14(2–3), 173–187.
  • Crozier, M. (2008). Listening, learning, steering: New governance, communication and interactive policy formation. Policy & Politics, 36(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308783431616
  • Davis, A., Jansen van Rensburg, M., & Venter, P. (2016). The impact of managerialism on the strategy work of university middle managers. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1480–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.981518
  • Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12139
  • Donina, D., & Paleari, S. (2019). New public management: Global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the napoleonic administrative tradition. Higher Education, 78(1), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y
  • Dowsett, L. (2020). Global university rankings and strategic planning: A case study of Australian institutional performance. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 42(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1701853
  • Doyle, T., & Brady, M. (2018). Reframing the university as an emergent organisation: Implications for strategic management and leadership in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 40(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1478608
  • Dunsire, A. (1996). Tipping the balance: Autopoiesis and governance. Administration & Society, 28(3), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979602800302
  • Esmark, A. (2010). Systems theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The sage handbook of governance (pp. 91–105). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964
  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5
  • Friedrichsmeier, A., & Marcinkowski, F. (2016). The mediatisation of university governance: A theoretical and empirical exploration of some side-effects. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14431876145728
  • Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., Stensaker, B., & Bótas, P. C. P. (2013). A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: Strategising pluralistic organizations in multiplex environments. Higher Education, 65(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9582-8
  • Fumasoli, T., Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2020). The determinants of university strategic positioning: A reappraisal of the organization. Higher Education, 80(2), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00481-6
  • Fumasoli, T., & Lepori, B. (2011). Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions. Higher Education, 61(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9330-x
  • Goodwill, R.J. (2012). Engaging staff communities in a knowledge transfer strategy: A case study at the University of Melbourne. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 34(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.678726
  • Hasse, R., & Krücken, G. (2013). Competition and actorhood: A further expansion of the neo-institutional agenda. Sociologia Internationalis, 51(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.3790/sint.51.2.181
  • Heger, T., & Rohrbeck, R. (2012). Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.003
  • Jessop, B. (2010). Metagovernance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The sage handbook of governance (pp. 106–123). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964.n8
  • Jungblut, J., & Vukasovic, M. (2013). And now for something completely different? re-examining hybrid steering approaches in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2013.28
  • Kallio, T.J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. (2020). From professional bureaucracy to competitive bureaucracy – redefining universities’ organization principles, performance measurement criteria, and reason for being. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 17(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-10-2019-0111
  • Kickert, W.J.M. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in dutch higher education. Governance, 8(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00202.x
  • Lenartowicz, M. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher Education, 69(6), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9815-0
  • Luhmann, N. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130–152.
  • Luhmann, N. (1997a). The control of intransparency. System Research and Behavioural Science, 14(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199711/12)14:6<359:AID-SRES160>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Luhmann, N. (1997b). Limits of steering. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001003
  • Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society. volume 1 (R. Barrett , Trans.). Stanford University Press. ( Original work published 1997).
  • Luhmann, N. (2018). Organization and decision. ( D. Baecker, Ed; R. Barrett, Trans.), Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560672
  • Lynch, R., & Baines, P. (2004). Strategy development in UK higher education: Towards resource‐based competitive advantages. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 26(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080042000218249
  • Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2006). University leaders’ strategies in the global environment: A comparative study of universitas Indonesia and the Australian national university. Higher Education, 52(2), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-5591-6
  • Mayntz, R. (2016). Steering. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 259–266). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00034
  • Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110302
  • Morphew, C.C., Fumasoli, T., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Changing missions? How the strategic plans of research-intensive universities in northern Europe and north America balance competing identities. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1214697
  • Pfeffer, T., & Stichweh, R. (2015). Systems theoretical perspectives on higher education policy and governance. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. D. Dill, & M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance (pp. 152–175). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_9
  • Pietilä, M., & Pinheiro, R. (2021). Reaching for different ends through tenure track – institutional logics in university career systems. Higher Education, 81(6), 1197–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00606-2
  • Schirmer, W., & Hadamek, C. (2007). Steering as paradox the ambiguous role of the political system in modern society. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14(2–3), 133–150.
  • Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (2006). Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization, 13(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059635
  • Stichweh, R. (2005). Neue Steuerungsformen der Universität und die akademische selbsverwaltung: Die Universität als organisation [new forms of university control and academic self-administration: The university as an organization. In U. Sieg & D. Korsch (Eds.), Die Idee der Universität heute (pp. 123–134). De Gruyter Saur.
  • Stolze, A., & Sailer, K. (2022). Advancing HEIs’ third-mission through dynamic capabilities: The role of leadership and agreement on vision and goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 580–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09850-9
  • Takala, M., & Keskinen, S. (2014). Performance dialogs implemented in a Finnish university. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1170–1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777409
  • Tuunainen, J., & Kantasalmi, K. (2023). Processing societal expectations: Entrepreneurship initiative decision-making at a research university. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01063-3
  • Tuunainen, J., Kantasalmi, K., & Laari-Salmela, S. (2021). Experimenting in the organisational periphery: Introducing extra-curricular entrepreneurship education in traditional research universities. In P. Eriksson, U. Hytti, K. Komulainen, T. Montonen, & P. Siivonen (Eds.), New movements in academic entrepreneurship (pp. 48–66). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370135.00012
  • University of Helsinki. (2006). University of Helsinki’s strategy for 2007-09. University of Helsinki. Accepted on 18 January. 2006 by Consistorium.
  • University of Helsinki. (2009). Strategic plant for the University of Helsinki 2010-12. University of Helsinki. Accepted on 11 February. 2009 by Consistorium.
  • University of Helsinki. (2012) The best for the world: Strategic plant for the University of Helsinki for 2013-2016. Finnish Original Approved by the Board of the University of Helsinki on 18 January 2012. http://rritrends.res-agora.eu/uploads/22/strategia_2013-2016_eng%20(1).pdf
  • University of Helsinki. (2016) Strategic plan of the University of Helsinki: Global impact in interaction 2017-20. Accepted on 20 January 2016 by the Board. http://strategia.helsinki.fi/en/#
  • University of Helsinki. (n.d.) Strategic plan of the University of Helsinki 2021-30: With the power of knowledge – for the world. https://www.helsinki.fi/en/about-us/strategy-economy-and-quality/strategic-plan-2021-2030/strategic-plan-of-the-university-of-helsinki