Coloniality of Epistemic Power in International Practices: NGO Inclusion in World Bank Policymaking

References

• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. 2014. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113512702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations. The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering. A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, and Steven Bernstein. 2004. “Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance.” In Power in Global Governance, edited by Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, Niklas Bremberg, and Maïka Sondarjee. In Reviews. “Communities of Practice in World Politics: Advancing a Research Agenda.” Global Studies Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Ake, Claude. 1979. Social Science as Imperialism: The Theory of Political Development. Lagos: Ibadan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albin, Cecilia. 1999. “Can NGOs Enhance the Effectiveness of International Negotiation?” International Negotiation 4 (3): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069920848534.
   Google Scholar
• Alger, C. 2002. “The Emerging Roles of NGOs in the UN System: From Article 71 to a People’s Millennium Assembly” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 8 (1): 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00801009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, Samir. 2009. Eurocentrism: Modernity, Religion, and Democracy: A Critique of Eurocentrism and Culturalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., and P. Langley. 2004. “Ambiguities of Global Civil Society.” Review of International Studies 30 (1): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504005844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderl, Felix. 2022. Broken Solidarities: How Open Global Governance Divides and Rules. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderl, Felix, P. Daphi, and Nicole Deitelhoff. 2021. “Keeping Your Enemies Close? The Variety of Social Movements’ Reactions to International Organizations’ Opening Up.” International Studies Review 23 (4): 1273–1299. https://doi-org.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/10.1093/isr/viaa103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, Henrik Hansen, and Thomas Markussen. 2006. “US Politics and World Bank IDA-Lending.” The Journal of Development Studies 42 (5): 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380600741946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge Studies in International Relations 114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aycrigg, Maria. 1998. “Participation and the World Bank Success, Constraints, and Responses.” 29. Draft for discussion at the international conference on upscaling and mainstreaming participation: lessons learned and ways forward. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, J. L., and V. R. Panchamukhi. 1990. Aid in the 1990s with Special Reference to World Bank and IDA. New Delhi: Research and Information System for the Non-Aligned and Other Developing Countries (RIS).
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, Anthony, David Lewis, Simon Batterbury, Elizabeth Olson, and M. Shameem Siddiqi. 2007. “Of Texts and Practices: Empowerment and Organisational Cultures in World Bank-Funded Rural Development Programmes.” The Journal of Development Studies 43 (4): 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701259665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., and U. Mörth. 2010. “Introduction: Partnerships, Democracy, and Governance.” In Democracy and Public–Private Partnerships in Global Governance, edited by Magdalena Bexell and Ulrika Mörth, 3–23. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, Junru. 2022. “The Racialization of Expertise and Professional Non-Equivalence in the Humanitarian Workplace.” Journal of International Humanitarian Action 7 (3): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, Federica. 2022. “Communities of Practice and What They Can Do for International Relations.” Review of International Studies 48 (1): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremberg, Niklas, August Danielson, Elsa Hedling, and Anna Michalski. 2022. “The Everyday Making of EU Foreign and Security Policy: Practices, Socialization and the Management of Dissent.” In New Horizons in European Politics Series, 149–160. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Chris. 2012. “The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory?” Millenium - Journal of International Studies 40 (3): 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812441893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, Michael M., ed. 1991. Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development. New York: Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, Steve. 1997. “Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance.” Michigan Journal of International Law 18 (1): 183–286. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol18/iss2/1.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Karin, and Ingie Hovland. 2003. The PRSP Initiative: Multilateral Policy Change and the Role of Research. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul, and Jan Willem Gunning. 1999. “The IMF’s Role in Structural Adjustment.” The Economic Journal 109 (459): 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea. 2007. “Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing Development Discourse.” Development in Practice 17 (4-5): 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469302.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Beverly. 1991. “Toward a Theory of Progress in International Relations.” In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Emanuel Adler, and Beverly Crawford, 438–468. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Angela Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? Open Media Book. New York: Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Christopher Daase. 2021. “Rule and Resistance in Global Governance.” International Theory 13 (1): 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2003. Crítica de la razón indolente: contra el desperdicio de la experiencia : para un nuevo sentido común: la ciencia, el derecho y la política en la transición paradigmática. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus, Henning Schmidtke, and Tobias Weise. 2020. “The Rise of Democratic Legitimation: Why International Organizations Speak the Language of Democracy.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (3): 714–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dladla, Ndumiso. 2017. “Towards an African Critical Philosophy of Race: Ubuntu as a Philo-Praxis of Liberation.” Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 6 (1): 39–68. https://doi.org/10.4314/ft.v6i1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, Jack. 2017. “Beyond Hierarchy.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, edited by Ayşe Zarakol, 243–265. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drieschova, Alena, Christian Bueger, and Ted Hopf, eds. 2022. Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, Mohan, and Rahul Rastogi. 2016. “Deconstructing PRSP Measurement: Participation as Neoliberal Colonization.” Journal of Creative Communications 11 (3): 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258616667180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. 2018. “Professionalizing Protest: Scientific Capital and Advocacy in Trade Politics.” International Political Sociology 12 (3): 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccleston, Bernard. 1996. “Does North-South Collaboration Enhance NGO Influence on Deforestation Policies in Malaysia and Indonesia?” The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 34 (1): 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662049608447717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., and J. Gaventa. 2001. Global Citizen Action. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, Charles. 1987. “Some Aspects of Relations Between the North and South in the NGO Sector.” World Development 15 (1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(87)90143-4.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. 1995. On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, Frantz. 1961. Les Damnés de La Terre. Paris: Maspéro.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organisation 52 (4): 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Stephen. 2000. “Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Therory” Journal of Management Studies 37 (6): 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, Mervyn. 2009. “Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations.” In Critical Issues in Global Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, Mervyn, and Silviya Lechner. 2015. “Two Conceptions of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis or Wittgensteinian Language-Games?” Review of International Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain, R. D., and M. Kenny. 2005. The Idea of Global Civil Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordenker, Leon, and Thomas G. Weiss. 1995. “NGO Participation in the International Policy Process.” Third World Quarterly 16 (3): 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599550036059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2007. “The Epistemic Decolonial Turn: Beyond Political-Economy Paradigms.” Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross Stein, Janice. 2011. “Background Knowledge in the Foreground: Conversations About Competent Practices in ‘Sacred Space’.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, 87–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez y Muhs, Gabriella, ed. 2012. Presumed Incompetent: The Intersections of Race and Class for Women in Academia. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, Paul Alexander. 2007. “The Firm Rules: Multinational Corporations, Policy Space and Neoliberalism.” Third World Quarterly 28 (6): 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701507594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofius, Maren. 2021. “Practice Approaches in International Political Theory.” In Perspectives on International Political Theory in Europe, edited by Vassilios Paipais, 87–106. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77274-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Holthaus, Leonie. 2021. “Practice Theory and the Opening Up of International Organizations.” Global Studies Quarterly 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab020.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen. 2015. “Multilateral Trade Governance as Social Field: Global Civil Society and the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (6): 1128–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1066696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. 2010. “Global Civil Society: Emergent Forms of Cosmopolitan Democracy and Justice.” In Power Shifts and Global Governance: Challenges from South and North, edited by A. Kumar, and D. Messner, 45–64. London: Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapeyre, Frédéric. 2006. Objectifs Du Millénaire Pour Le Développement : Outils de Développement Ou Cheval de Troie Des Politiques Néolibérales? Brussels: Institut d’études Du Développement de l’Université Catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, Jon Harald Sande. 2015. “Developmentality: Indirect Governance in the World Bank–Uganda Partnership.” Third World Quarterly 36 (4): 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1024435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, Sarah, and Warren Nyamugasira. 2003. “Design Contradictions in the ‘New Architecture of Aid’? Reflections from Uganda on the Roles of Civil Society Organisations.” Development Policy Review 21 (1): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00200.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, Marìa. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25 (4): 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, H., ed. 2009. Democratizing Global Governance: Ten Years of Case Studies and Reflections by Civil Society Activists. New Delhi: Mosaic.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2007. “On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept.” Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, Kerstin. 2005. NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Adaptation. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, Emma, Janet G. Townsend, and Gina Porter. 2005. “Trust, Accountability, and Face-to-Face Interaction in North-South NGO Relations.” Development in Practice 15 (1): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452052000321613.
   Google Scholar
• Mbonda, Ernest-Marie. 2021. Une décolonisation de la pensée: études de philosophie afrocentrique. Paris: Sorbonne Université Presses.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, Linsey, Thiel Darren, and Robin West. 2018. “Le Philanthrocapitalisme et Les « crimes Des Dominants ».” Politix 121 (1): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.121.0029.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, Peggy. 2003. “White Privilege and Male Privilege: A Personal Account of Coming to See Correspondences Through Work in Women's Studies.”
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mkandawire, Thandike. 2007. “'Good Governance’: The Itinerary of an Idea.” Development in Practice 17 (4-5): 679–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469997.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Momani, Bessma. 2010. “IMF Rethoric on Reducing Poverty and Inequality.” In Global Governance, Poverty and Inequality, edited by Jennifer Clapp and Rorden Wilkinson, 71–90. New York: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Mudimbe, V. Y. 1988. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. African Systems of Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, Deepak. 2020. “Emotional Labor and the Power of International Bureaucrats.” International Studies Quarterly 64 (3): 573–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. 2018. Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. Rethinking Development. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Niezen, Ronald, and Maria Sapignoli, eds. 2017. Palaces of Hope: The Anthropology of Global Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meally, Simon. 2014. “The Contradictions of Pro-Poor Participation and Empowerment: The World Bank in East Africa.” Development and Change 45 (6): 1248–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pailey, Robtel Neajai. 2020. “De-centring the ‘White Gaze’ of Development.” Development and Change 51 (3): 729–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampinella, Stephen. 2021. “The Way of Progress and Civilization”: Racial Hierarchy and US State Building in Haiti and the Dominican Republic (1915-1922).” Journal of Global Security Studies 6 (3): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, Richard. 2003. Unholy Trinity. The IMF, World Bank and WTO. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, Jemima. 2020. “The Racial Vernaculars of Development: A View from West Africa.” American Anthropologist 122 (1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingeot, Lou. 2020. “International Peacebuilding as a Case of Structural Injustice.” International Peacekeeping 27 (2): 263–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2015. “The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security.” Review of International Studies 41 (2): 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2018. “Global Governance in Practice.” Global Policy 9 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, Simon Frankel. 2020. “From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR.” International Theory 12 (1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, Aníbal. 1991. “Colonialidad y Modernidad/Racionalidad.” Peru Indigerna 13 (29): 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rahnema, Majid. 1990. “Participatory Action Research: The “Last Temptation of Saint” Development” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 15 (2): 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549001500204.
   Google Scholar
• Ralph, Jason, and Jess Gifkins. 2017. “The Purpose of United Nations Security Council Practice: Contesting Competence Claims in the Normative Context Created by the Responsibility to Protect.” European Journal of International Relations 23 (3): 630–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116669652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, Kal. 1997. “States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, Caroline M. 2002. Can the Poor Influence Policy? Participatory Poverty Assessments in the Developing World. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-Otto Czempiel. 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckert, Arne. 2007. “Producing Neoliberal Hegemony? A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (Prsp) in Nicaragua” Studies in Political Economy 79 (1): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2007.11675093.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, John G. 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (4): 855–885. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salm, Janet. 1999. “Coping with Globalization: A Profile of the Northern NGO Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (1_suppl): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976499773746447.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore Richard. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny, 10–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore Richard. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2004. “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00121.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2012. “A More Inclusive Global Governance? The IMF and Civil Society in Africa.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (2): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01802004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob, Iver B. Jacob. 2011. “Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 231–254. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Leanne. 2001. “Aboriginal Peoples and Knowledge: Decolonizing Our Processes.” The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 21 (1): 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Sondarjee, Maïka. 2021a. “Change and Stability at the World Bank: Inclusive Practices and Neoliberal Technocratic Rationality.” Third World Quarterly 42 (2): 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1838893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondarjee, Maïka. 2021b. “Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank.” Global Society 35 (3): 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1835833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondarjee, Maïka, and Nathan Andrews. 2023. “Decolonizing International Relations and Development Studies: What’s in a buzzword?” International Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231166588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2006. Les subalternes peuvent-elles parler? Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens. 2013. “Explaining Cooperation Between IGOs and NGOs – Push Factors, Pull Factors, and the Policy Cycle.” Review of International Studies 39 (4): 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, Ann. 2001. “Chapter 5. What Anchors Cultural Practices.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Theodore Richard Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, Eike Von Savigny. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Lisa M. Dellmuth, Hans Agné, and Andreas Duit. 2018. “NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access and Exchange.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500037X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamale, Sylvia. 2020. Decolonization and Afro-Feminism. Ottawa: Daraja Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thiong’O, Ngugiwa. 2005. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Reprint, Studies in African Literature. Oxford: Currey [u.a.].
   Google Scholar
• Van Milders, Lucas, and Harmonie Toros. 2020. “Violent International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (1_suppl): 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120938832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, Robert. 2002. “US Hegemony and the World Bank: The Fight Over People and Ideas.” Review of International Political Economy 9 (2): 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110126092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. 1st ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, Catherine. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, Etienne, Mark Fenton-O’Creevy, Steven Hutchison, and Beverly Wenger-Trayner, eds. 2015. Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2018. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willetts, Peter. 2002. “What is a Non-Governmental Organization?” UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. http://www.sta.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensohn, James D. 2010. A Global Life: My Journey among Rich and Poor, from Sydney to Wall Street to the World Bank. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Ngaire, and Amrita Narlikar. 2001. “Governance and the Limits of Accountability: The WTO, the IMF and the World Bank.” International Social Science Journal 53 (170): 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00345.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. 2004. “Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries*” British Journal of Management 15 (S1): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.t01-1-00403.x.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayşe, ed. 2017. Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar