65
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Pre-malignant and malignant cervical pathologies among inert and copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive device users: A 10-year follow-up study

, &
Pages 89-97 | Published online: 06 Jul 2009

References

  • World Cancer Report, B W Stewart, P Kleihues. IARC Press, Lyon 2003, WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • Schiff M, Miller J, Masuk M, et al. Contraceptive and reproductive risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in American Indian women. Int J Epidemiol 2000; 29: 983–990
  • World Health Organization. Technical Report Series No. 753. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. WHO, GenevaSwitzerland 1987, Report of a WHO Scientific Group
  • Misra J S, Engineer A D, Tandon P. Cytopathological changes in human cervix and endometrium following prolonged retention of copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices. Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 237–242
  • Rivera R, Best K. Current opinion: consensus statement on intrauterine contraception. Contraception 2002; 65: 385–388
  • Treiman K, Liskin L. IUDs—A new look. Population Reports. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 1988; No. 5, Series B
  • Richart R M, Barron B A. The intrauterine device and cervical neoplasia. A prospective study of patients with cervical dysplasia. J Am Med Assoc 1967; 199: 817–819
  • Lassise D L, Savitz D A, Hamman R F, et al. Invasive cervical cancer and intrauterine device use. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 865–870
  • Batar I. The Szontagh IUD and cervical carcinoma (results of a 10-year follow up study) [in Hungarian]. Orv Hetil 1990; 131: 1871–1874
  • Lifetab v7. International Fertility Research Program. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 1978
  • Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann 1973; 4: 35–42
  • Swinscow T D. XIV. The chi square tests. Br Med J 1976; 2: 462–463
  • Ryan W L, Stenback F, Curtis G L. Tumor promotion by foreign bodies (IUD). Cancer Lett 1981; 13: 299–302
  • Rowe P J. The intrauterine device: review of recent advances and controversies. Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology, C A Finn. Oxford University Press, OxfordUK 1981; Vol. 2: 49
  • Li H Q, Thomas D B, Jin S K, Wu F. Tubal sterilization and use of an IUD and risk of cervical cancer. J Women's Health Gend Based Med 2000; 9: 303–310
  • Blenkinsopp W K, Chapman P. Prevalence of cervical neoplasia and infection in women using intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 709–713
  • Engineer A D, Misra J S, Tandon P. Long-term cytologic studies of copper-IUD users. Acta Cytol 1981; 25: 550–556
  • The New Zealand Contraception and Health Study Group. Risk of cervical dysplasia in users of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices or depot-medroxy progesterone acetate. Contraception 1994; 50: 431–441

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.