The profile of emergency contraception users in a chlamydia prevalence study in primary care in Belgium

References

• National commission for the evaluation of the law of April the third 1990 concerning abortions. 2003, Report on behalf of the Parliament
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F, Hatcher R A. Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24: 269–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camp S L, Wilkerson D S, Raine T R. The benefits and risks of over-the-counter availability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception. Contraception 2003; 68: 309–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine T R, Harper C C, Rocca C H, et al. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 293: 54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Baird D. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. New Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S, et al. Advance provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception 2004; 69: 361–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven V, Avonts D, Meheus A, et al. Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice. Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79: 313–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A M, Mercer C H, Erens B, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet 2001; 358: 1835–1842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickey R M, Greenland S. A study of the impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 125–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Interview Survey. Scientific Institute of Public Health, Epidemiology Unit. 2001, http://www.iph.fgov.be/epidemio/epien/index4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Goulard H, Bajos N, Job-Spira N. Equipe Cocon. Emergency contraception in France: the user profile. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2003; 31: 724–729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lete I, Cabero L, Alvarez D, Olle C. Observational study of emergency contaception in Spain; results of a national survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003; 8: 203–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk G, Falk L, Hanson U, Milsom I. Young women requesting emergency contraception are, despite contraceptive counseling, a high risk group for new unintended pregnancies. Contraception 2001; 64: 23–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawe J, Ineichen B, Lawrenson R. Emergency contraception: Who are the users?. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2001; 27: 209–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyden T, Wetterholm M, Odlind V. Emergency contraception: the user profile. Adv Contracept 1998; 14: 171–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter J H. Use of hormonal emergency contraception at a university health centre over a 6 year period. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2001; 27: 47–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettle H, Cay S, Brown A, Glasier A. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection is indicated for women under 30 using emergency contraception. Contraception 2002; 66: 251–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfs R T, Galaid E I, Zaidi A A. Pelvic inflammatory disease: trends in hospitalizations and office visits, 1979 through 1988. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 983–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms I, Stephenson J M. Pelvic inflammatory disease epidemiology: what do we know and what do we need to know?. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76: 80–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Task Force on Post-Ovulatory Methods for Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998; 352: 428–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrier L A, Dean D, Klein E, et al. Limitations of screening tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic adolescent and young adult women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 654–662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J S, Honey E, Templeton A, et al. A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European women. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 385–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscidi R P, Bobo L, Hook E W, 3rd, Quinn T C. Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1993; 168: 488–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markos A R. The concordance of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection between sexual partners, in the era of nucleic acid testing. Sex Health 2005; 2: 23–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn T C, Gaydos C, Shepherd M, et al. Epidemiologic and microbiologic correlates of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexual partnerships. J Am Med Assoc 1996; 276: 1737–1742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar