A study of opinions about the Polish constitutional tribunal’s judgement strengthening Polish abortion laws

References

• Hussein J, Cottingham J, Nowicka W, et al. Abortion in Poland: politics, progression and regression. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(52):1467361–1467314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polish Journal of Laws 1993 no 17 item 78. Act of 7 January 1993 on family planning, protection of the human fetus and conditions for permitting termination of pregnancies. Polish. [Internet]. Available from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19930170078/U/D19930078Lj.pdf. [accessed 09 September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Szlek-Miller S. Religion and politics in Poland: the abortion issue. Can Slavon Pap. 1997;39(1-2):63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicka W. SexPolitics: Reports from the Front Lines. Brasil: Sexuality Policy Watch. 2007. 5, Poland - The Struggle for Abortion Rights in Poland; p. 167–196.
   Google Scholar
• Polish Journal of Laws 1996, no 139, item 646. Act of 30 August 1996 amending the decision on family planning, the protection of legal provisions and the temporary permissibility of interrupting inspections and amending certain other acts. Polish. [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19961390646/O/D19960646.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Polish Journal of Laws 1997, no 157, item 1040. Act of 18 December 1997 on the loss of the binding nature of Art. 1 point 2, art. 1 point 5, art. 2 point 2, art. 3 paragraph 1 and article. 3 pt. 4 changes to the provisions on family planning, protection of the fetus and conditions. Polish. [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19971571040/O/D19971040.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graff A. Right-Wing Populism and Gender. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. 2020. 13, Angry Women: Poland’s Black Protests as ‘Populist Feminism’. p. 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal JZ. Matters of “conscience”: the politics of reproductive healthcare in Poland. Med Anthropol Q. 2009;23(2):161–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feflecki W. Raport Ministerstwa Zdrowia: 1076 aborcji w Polsce w 2020 roku. W tym legalne byłyby 23. [Report of the Ministry of Health: 1076 abortions in Poland in 2020. 23 of them would be legal this year] [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.rp.pl/kraj/art10701-raport-ministerstwa-zdrowia-1076-aborcji-w-polsce-w-2020-r-w-tym-legalne-bylyby-23
   Google Scholar
• Regulation of the Council of Ministers, 2020. item 1829. Act of 16 October 2020 amending the regulations on the establishment of restrictions, orders and bans in the event of an epidemic. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Tribunal judgment of October 22, 2020. K 1/20a. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan SE. Gender and abortion attitudes: religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opin Q. 2014;78(4):940–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira-McDonough J. Men and women as interest groups in the abortion debate in the United States. Womens Stud Int Forum. 1989;12(5):539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris RJ, Mills EW. Religion, values and attitudes toward abortion. J Sci Study Relig. 1985;24(2):137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adsera A. Religion and changes in family-size norms in developed countries. Rev Relig Res. 2006;47(3):71–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayford SR, Morgan SP. Religiosity and fertility in the United States: the role of fertility intentions. Soc Forces. 2008;86(3):1163–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bein C, Mynarska M, Gauthier AH. Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland. J Biosoc Sci. 2021;53(3):419–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worldometers. Poland coronavirus cases, [Internet]. [cited 07 July 2021]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/poland.
   Google Scholar
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny [Polish Central Statistical Office]. Rocznik demograficzny. [demographic journal of Poland]. Warsaw: GUS; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, et al. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;135(1):41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SL. What the ___ is your problem?: attribution theory and perceived reasons for profanity usage during conflict. Commun Res Rep. 2004;21(4):338–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dziaczkowska M. The Polish case: Pedophilia, Polak-Katolik, and theology of the nation. Sven Teol Kvartalskrift. 2020;96(3):235–251.
   Google Scholar
• Federacja na Rzecz Kobiet i Planowania Rodziny. Terminacja ciąży w 2019 roku – dostępność aborcji w Polsce wg najnowszych danych. [Termination of pregnancy in 2019 – the availability of abortion in Poland according to the latest data] [Internet] [cited 07 July 2021]. 2021. Available from: https://federa.org.pl/terminacja-ciazy-2019/.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicki P, Bakalarczyk R, Mackiewicz-Ziccardi M. Protests of people with disabilities as examples of fledgling disability activism in Poland. CJDS. 2019;8(5):141–160.
   Google Scholar
• CBOS [Centre for Public Opinion Research]. Korzystanie z interentu. [Internet use]. Warsaw: CBOS; 2020. Polish. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_085_20.PDF
   Google Scholar
• CBOS [Centre for Public Opinion Research]. O dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży i protestach po wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego [On the admissibility of termination of pregnancy and protests after the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal]. Warsaw: CBOS; 2020. Polish. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_153_20.PDF
   Google Scholar