References
- Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm U-B, Loft A, et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(2):260–276.
- Malvasi A, Signore F, Napoletano S, et al. 2014-2017. How medically assisted reproduction changed in Italy. A short comparative synthesis with european countries. Clin Ter. 2017;168:e248–e252.
- Negro F, Marinelli S. Is there anything left of the italian law governing medically-assisted procreation? Clin Ter. 2021;171(1):e57–e59.
- Imrie S, Golombok S. Long-term outcomes of children conceived through egg donation and their parents: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1187–1193.
- Ricci G, Campanozzi L, Marinelli S. The human embryo, subjectivity and legal capacity. Notes in the light of art. 1 of the italian law on “medically assisted procreation. Clin Ter. 2019;170:102–107.
- Private international law. Riforma del sistema italiano di diritto internazionale privato 218/1995. 1995. [Accessed 6 May 2021]. Available from: https://www.esteri.it/mae/doc/l218_1995.pdf
- Decree by the President of the Italian Republic 396/2000, D.P.R. 2000. Regolamento per la revisione e la semplificazione dell'ordinamento dello stato civile, a norma dell'articolo 2, comma 12, della L. 15 maggio 1997, n. 127. art. 18. [Accessed 6 May 2021]. Available from: https://www.esteri.it/mae/doc/dpr396_2000.pdf
- Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003. concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, art. 23. [Accessed 6 May 2021]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R2201&from=EN
- Ravitsky V. The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction . Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017;6:3s13584-016-0125–0.
- Ravelingien A, Pennings G. The right to know your genetic parents: from Open-Identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing. Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(5):33–41.
- Hertz R, Nelson MK, Kramer W. Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: the relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Soc Sci Med. 2013;86:52–65.
- de Melo-Martín I. How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations? Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;3:100–108.
- Zaami S. Assisted heterologous fertilization and the right of donorconceived children to know their biological origins. Clin Ter. 2018;169(1):e39–e43.
- Negro F, Varone MC, Del Rio A. Advances in medically-assisted procreation technologies: can malpractice claims and “reproductive damage” be identified? Clin Ter. 2020;171:225–228.
- Law 184/83, art. 44, subsection 1, lett. D. 1983. [Accessed on 8 May 2021]. Available from: https://www.edscuola.it/archivio/norme/leggi/l184_83.htm
- Italian Constitutional Court Press Service. It is up to the legislature to find the best-suited forms of safeguards for the sake of children born abroad through surrogacy. 2021. [Accessed on 8 May 2021]. Available from: https://images.go.wolterskluwer.com/Web/WoltersKluwer/%7B7ae82e56-1e00-4d29-a5d0-9b0d9c15eaaf
- Padua Court Application to the Italian Constitutional Court. 2019.
- Italian Constitutional Court ruling n. 33. 2021.
- Grand Chamber Case of Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (Application no. 25358/12). Strasbourg, 24th January 2017. [Accessed on 8 May 2021]. Available at: https://lovdata.no/static/EMDN/emd-2012-025358-2.pdf
- Dute J. European court of human rights. ECHR 2015/12 case of paradiso and campanelli v. Italy, 27 january 2015, no. 25358/12 (second section). Eur J Health Law. 2015;22:289–292.
- Iliadou M. Surrogacy and the ECtHR: Reflections on paradiso and campanelli v Italy. Med Law Rev. 2019;27(1):144–154.
- Menneson v. France, application no. 65192/11. 2014. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#
- Labassee v. France, application no. 65941/11. 2014. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#
- European Court of Human Rights. Guidelines on the implementation of the advisory-opinion procedure introduced by Protocol No. 16 to the Convention (as approved by the Plenary Court on 18 September 2017). Available from: https://echr.coe.int/Documents/Guidelines_P16_ENG.pdf
- Piersanti V, Consalvo F, Signore F, et al. Surrogacy and “procreative tourism”. what does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives? Medicina. 2021;57(1):47.
- Knoche JW. Health concerns and ethical considerations regarding international surrogacy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):183–186.
- Berend Z, Guerzoni CS. Reshaping relatedness? The case of US surrogacy. Antropologica. 2019;6:83–99.
- Imrie S, Jadva V. The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):424–435.
- Jadva V, Imrie S. Children of surrogate mothers: psychological well-being, family relationships and experiences of surrogacy. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(1):90–96.
- Zaami S, Marinelli E, di Luca NM, Montanari Vergallo G. Ethical and medico-legal remarks on uterus transplantation: may it solve uterine factor infertility? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:5290–5296.
- Carone N, Baiocco R, Manzi D, et al. Surrogacy families headed by gay men: relationships with surrogates and egg donors, fathers’ decisions over disclosure and children’s views on their surrogacy origins. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(2):248–257.
- Berend Z. The social context for surrogates' motivations and satisfaction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):399–401.
- Jadva V, Gamble N, Prosser H, et al. Parents' relationship with their surrogate in cross-border and domestic surrogacy arrangements: comparisons by sexual orientation and location. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(3):562–570.
- Schumm WR. A review and critique of research on Same-Sex parenting and adoption. Psychol Rep. 2016;119(3):641–760.
- Points K. Commercial surrogacy and fertility tourism in India. The case of baby Manji. Case Studies in Ethics,The Kenan Institute For Ethics at Duke University. 2018. Available from: https://kenan.ethics.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BabyManji_Case2015.pdf
- Official website of the prime minister of the Indian government. News Updates: cabinet approves the assisted reproductive technology regulation bill 2020. 2020. Available from: https://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/news_updates/cabinet-approves-the-assisted-reproductive-technology-regulation-bill-2020
- Fenton-Glynn C. Surrogacy: Why the world needs rules for 'selling' babies. BBC News. 2019. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-47826356
- Aznar J, Martínez Peris M. Gestational surrogacy: current view. Linacre Q. 2019;86(1):56–67.
- Law n. 194. 1978. [Accessed 13 September 2021]. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/do/gazzetta/foglio_ordinario2/2/pdfPaginato?dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=19780522&numeroGazzetta=140&tipoSerie=FO&tipoSupplemento=GU&numeroSupplemento=0&progressivo=0&numPagina=1&edizione=0
- Charter of fundamental rights of the european union. 2000. [Accessed 13 September 2021]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32000X1218(01)&from=EN
- Zaami S, Busardò FP. Elective egg freezing: can you really turn back the clock? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19:3537–3538.
- Torres G, Shapiro A, Mackey TK. A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in South american countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):46.
- Parker WJ. The moral imperative of reproductive rights, health, and justice. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;62:3–10.
- Hague Conference on Private International Law. Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé. Conventions, Protocols and Principles. HCCH. 1951–2021. Available from: https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions.
- The World Organisation for Cross-border Co-operation in Civil and Commercial Matters. HCCH. The Parentage/Surrogacy Project. Prel. Doc. No 2B of February 2021. Available from: https://www.hcch.net/en/home
- Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 39/46 of 10 December 1984. Entered into force on 26th June 1987, in accordance with article 27 (1). Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cat.pdf
- Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. Entered into force on 2nd September 1990, in accordance with article 49. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession on 30th March 2007. Entered into force on 3rd March 2008. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/Volume%20I/Chapter%20IV/IV-15.en.pdf
- Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine. Signed on 4th April 1997. Entered into force on 1st December 1999. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007cf98