1,794
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Women’s decision-making related to induced abortion – a cross sectional study during a period of Covid-19 pandemic, in Sweden

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 44-50 | Received 31 Aug 2022, Accepted 16 Nov 2022, Published online: 02 Dec 2022

References

  • WHO. Abortion. Fact Sheets. 2021.
  • Socialstyrelsen. Statistik om aborter. 2022; [cited 2022 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/alla-statistikamnen/aborter/.
  • Official Statistics of Finland. Induced abortions in the Nordic countries 2019. 2022.
  • Larsson M, Aneblom G, Odlind V, et al. Reasons for pregnancy termination, contraceptive habits and contraceptive failure among Swedish women requesting an early pregnancy termination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(1):64–71.
  • Chae S, Desai S, Crowell M, et al. Reasons why women have induced abortions: a synthesis of findings from 14 countries. Contraception. 2017;96(4):233–241.
  • Makenzius M, Tydén T, Darj E, et al. Repeat induced abortion – a matter of individual behaviour or societal factors? A cross-sectional study among Swedish women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16(5):369–377.
  • van Ditzhuijzen J, Brauer M, Boeije H, et al. Dimensions of decision difficulty in women’s decision-making about abortion: a mixed methods longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212611.
  • Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, et al. Induced first-trimester abortion and risk of mental disorder. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(4):332–339.
  • Stålhandske ML, Makenzius M, Tydén T, et al. Existential experiences and needs related to induced abortion in a group of Swedish women: a quantitative investigation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;33(2):53–61.
  • Makenzius M, Tydén T, Darj E, et al. Women and men’s satisfaction with care related to induced abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012;17(4):260–269.
  • Endler M, Al-Haidari T, Benedetto C, et al. How the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is impacting sexual and reproductive health and rights and response: results from a global survey of providers, researchers, and policy-makers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(4):571–578.
  • Lewis R, Blake C, Shimonovich M, et al. Disrupted prevention: condom and contraception access and use among young adults during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. an online survey. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(4):269–276.
  • Niemeyer Hultstrand J, Törnroos E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Induced abortion and access to contraception in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022;48(4):311–312.
  • Nina Sun JD. Overturning Roe v Wade: reproducing injustice. BMJ. 2022;377:o1588.
  • Hussein J, Cottingham J, Nowicka W, et al. Abortion in Poland: politics, progression and regression. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(52):1467361–1467314.
  • Håkansson DIG, Ouis P, Ragnar ME. Navigating the minefield: women’s experiences of abortion in a country with a conscience clause – the case of Croatia. J Int Women’s Stud. 2021;2021:22.
  • Broen AN, Moum T, Bödtker AS, et al. Reasons for induced abortion and their relation to women’s emotional distress: a prospective, two-year follow-up study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(1):36–43.
  • Brauer M, van Ditzhuijzen J, Boeije H, et al. Understanding decision-making and decision difficulty in women with an unintended pregnancy in The Netherlands. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(8):1084–1095.
  • Söderberg H, Andersson C, Janzon L, et al. Continued pregnancy among abortion applicants. A study of women having a change of mind. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(10):942–947.
  • Rehnström Loi U, Otieno B, Oguttu M, et al. Abortion and contraceptive use stigma: a cross-sectional study of attitudes and beliefs in secondary school students in Western Kenya. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(3):1652028–1652031.
  • Cleeve A, Oguttu M, Ganatra B, et al. Time to act – comprehensive abortion care in East Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e601–2–e602.
  • Frederico M, Michielsen K, Arnaldo C, et al. Factors influencing abortion decision-making processes among young women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):329.
  • Ekstrand M, Tydén T, Darj E, et al. An illusion of power: qualitative perspectives on abortion decision-making among teenage women in Sweden. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41(3):173–180.
  • Kirkman M, Rowe H, Hardiman A, et al. Reasons women give for abortion: a review of the literature. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009;12(6):365–378.
  • Purcell C, Riddell J, Brown A, et al. Women’s experiences of more than one termination of pregnancy within two years: a mixed-methods study. BJOG. 2017;124(13):1983–1992.
  • Sit D, Rothschild AJ, Creinin MD, et al. Psychiatric outcomes following medical and surgical abortion. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):878–884.
  • Wallin Lundell I, Sundström Poromaa I, Ekselius L, et al. Neuroticism-related personality traits are associated with posttraumatic stress after abortion: findings from a Swedish multi-center cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):96.
  • Rocca CH, Kimport K, Gould H, et al. Women’s emotions one week After receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;45(3):122–131.
  • Statistikmyndigheten SCB. Utländska medborgare i Sverige. 2022; [cited 2022 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/manniskorna-i-sverige/utlandska-medborgare-i-sverige/.