Usage of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (postpartum-IUD) after an increase in the institutional delivery rate in India: time to re-visit the effect of timing of counselling on its acceptance

References

• Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, et al. India’s janani suraksha yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):2009–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• IIFPS. National family health survey (NFHS-5), 2019–20. IIPS India, Mumbai. 2020. http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for - Antenatal care and skilled attendance at Birth 2010. https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/maternal-health/guidelines/sba_guidelines_for_skilled_attendance_at_birth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borda M. Family planning needs during the extended postpartum period in India [Internet]. Access family planning initiative brief. 2009. [http://www.accesstohealth.org/toolres/pdfs/India_Analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 8: Interpregnancy care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e51–e72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. p. 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Programming strategies for postpartum family planning. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• PAIUCD Incentive Scheme & extension of PPIUCD Incentive Scheme. India. Schemes/Guidelines- FP. National Health Mission. 2020. https://nhm.gov.in/index1
   Google Scholar
• Katheit G, Agarwal J. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care Centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):539–543.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Sinha R, Mangal A. Knowledge, attitude and practice study on immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device method of family planning. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(8):2981–2984.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed A, Kamel S, Shaaban M, et al. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: assiut experience. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12(3):170–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raghuwanshi M, Agrawal S, Singh BK, et al. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: effects of antenatal versus postpartum counselling in acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(9):3742–3748.
   Google Scholar
• Kathpalia SK, Mustafa MS. Awareness about postpartum insertion of intrauterine device among antenatal cases. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(3):221–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agarwal N, Gupta M, Sharma A, et al. Antenatal counselling as a tool to increase acceptability of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(4):1137–1141.
   Google Scholar
• IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers and Nursing Personnel Family Planning Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India 2013. https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/family-planing/guidelines/IUCD_Reference_Manual_for_MOs_and_Nursing_Personne_-Final-Sept_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reddy NS, Sindhu KN, Ramanujam K, et al. Exclusive breastfeeding practices in an urban settlement of vellore, Southern India: findings from the MAL-ED birth cohort. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishimura H, Krupp K, Gowda S, et al. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in rural South India. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chauhan R, Sahni S, Hanumantaiya S. Evaluation of acceptability, safety and expulsion rate of PPIUCD. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):1083–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1359–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant S, Archana S, Singh A, et al. Acceptance rate, probability of follow-up, and expulsion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device offered at two primary health centers, North India. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2016;5(4):770–776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deshpande S, Gadappa S, Yelikar K, et al. Awareness, acceptability and clinical outcome of post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in marathwada region. India. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2017;4(1):77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Xess S, Sharma M, Rajoria L, et al. A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion, removal and continuation of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in indian women. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;2(1):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak AK, Jain MK. Experience on awareness, acceptability, safety, efficacy, complications and expulsion of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Int J Sci Stud. 2017;5(1):207–212.
   Google Scholar
• Doley R, Pegu B. A retrospective study on acceptability and complications of PPIUCD insertion. jemds. 2016;5(31):1631–1634.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(5):337–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahaman M, Srivastav A, Sood A. Complications following immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion among pregnant women. Iosr Jdms. 2019;18(1):04–09.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Malik R, Ahalawat R, et al. Evaluation of efficacy, expulsion and safety of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(4):2005–2009.
   Google Scholar