Post-disciplinary realism

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos and disciplines. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J., & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1p1), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and Control: New directions for the sociology of education. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E. (2001). Disciplining the Interdisciplinary: Radicalism and the Academic Curriculum. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690120094430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (1991). What middle-range theories are. Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2071781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1981). The Specificity of the Scientific Field. In C. C. Lemert (Ed.), Rupture and Renewal since 1968, French Sociology. Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity theory and the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as Experiments. Reforms as Experiments, 24, 409–429.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. S. (Editor). (2018). Silent Spring and other writings on the environment. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. C., Fleck, J., & Uebel, L. (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, T., Hall, C. M., & Duval, D. T. (2005). Mobilizing Tourism: A Post-disciplinary Critique. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2005.11081471
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studiesof expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (1997). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, I. (2011). Lost in translation? Try second language learning: Understanding movements of ideas and practices across time and space. Journal of Historical Sociology, 24(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friman, M. (2010). Understanding boundary work through discourse theory: Inter/disciplines and interdisciplinarity. Science Studies, 23, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983). Towards an ethnography of modern thought. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Local knowledge. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transactions.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism: A rationale for the natural sciences. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, M. F., Farber, G. K., Wilder, E. L., Kleinman, D. V., Grady, P. A., Schwartz, D. A., & Tabak, L. A. (2005). NIH Roadmap interdisciplinary research initiatives. PLoS Computational Biology, 1(6), e59–e59. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. S., & Sum, N.-L. (2001). Pre-disciplinary and Post-disciplinary Perspectives. New Political Economy, 6(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460020027777
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. F. P. (1999). For and against method. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisciplinary research using problem-centred methodologies. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach to qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. B., & Lunnay, B. (2013). The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociological Research Online, 18(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurath, O. (1931). Physicalism: The philosophy of the Vienna Circle. The Monist, 41(4), 623. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19314147
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• NIH. 2017. Office of strategic coordination - The common fund. Retrieved 7 February 2020. https://common/interdisciplinary: National Institute for Health.
   Google Scholar
• NIH. 2020. Interdisciplinary Research. Retrieved 7 February 2020. https://commonfund.nih.gov/Interdisciplinary/consortia
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. S., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Re-thinking science knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, S. (2013). Integrating critical realist and feminist methodologies: Ethical and analytical dilemmas. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. M. D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.–On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (1854–1905), 60, 489.
   Google Scholar
• Puck, T. (1992). The mammalian cell. In J. S. Cairns & G. S. Watson (Eds.), Phage and the origins of molecular biology: Expanded edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1992). Cases of “What is a case?”. In C, R. & H, B, Ed.. What is a case. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). For postdisciplinary studies: Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism. In J. M. Eldridge, S. Scott, C. Warhurst, & A. Witz (Eds.), For sociology: Legacies and prospects. Sociologypress.
   Google Scholar
• Siebenhüner, B. (2018). Conflicts in transdisciplinary research: Reviewing literature and analysing a case of climate adaptation in Northwestern Germany. Ecological Economics, 154, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, P. R. (2011). Dark tourism: Towards a new post-disciplinary research agenda. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formation. In R. T. K. Frodeman & J. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdiciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., & Popay, J. (1994). Researching the people’s lives. dilemmas and opportunities for social scientists. In J, P. & G, W Ed., Researching the people’s health.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In A. W. B. Irwin (Ed.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar