Quantification and realist methodologies

References

• Asher, H. (1983). Causal modelling (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blalock, H. (1961). Causal inference in nonexperimental research. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2002). Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2009). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, B., Griffiths, F., Rajaram, R., & Gunn, J. (2018). Exploring comorbid depression and physical health trajectories: A case-based computational modelling approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(6), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani, B and Hafferty, F. (2009). Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: discovering simplicity in a complex world. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Home Office. (1991). Review of health and social services for mentally disordered offenders and others requiring similar services - report of the community advisory group. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, W. (2001). The Identification of the careers of mentally disordered offenders using cluster analysis in a complex realist framework. [ PhD]. University of Durham, Centre for Applied Social Studies, Department of Sociology and Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. (1974). Cluster analysis. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. (2007). Statistical models for causation. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (Eds.), The sage handbook of social science methodology. London: Sage. pp. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gentili, P. L. (2018). Untangling complex systems: A grand challenge for science. London: CRC Press - Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: The amazing science of the unpredictable. Minerva.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (2011). Chaos: Making a new science. Open road. Integrated Media.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. (2016). Sociology as a population science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hingorani, M. (2014) Chasing programming languages: Extruding circos. MAT 259, 2014. Santa Barbara, Cal: University of California MatLab. http://vislab.mat.ucsb.edu/2014/p3/Mohit/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1911). A treatise of human nature. Volume one. London: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, H., Brown, P., & Cheung, S. Y. (2018). Fractures in the education–economy relationship: The end of the skill bias research programme? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gry008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers II. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster analysis for social scientists: Techniques for analyzing and simplifying complex blocks of data. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman, J., Menzies, R. J., & Palys, T. S. (1987). Transcarceration: essays in the sociology of social control. In A. E. Bottoms (Ed.), Cambridge studies in criminology. Gower. pp. 130–154.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Act. (1983). c. 20. London: Government of the United Kingdom. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/contents
   Google Scholar
• Mojena, R. (1977). Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An evaluation. The Computer Journal, 20(4), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/20.4.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence based policy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peay, J. (1994). Mentally disordered offenders. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 1119–1160). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America 1920-1960. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, L., Simpson, L., & Akinwale, B. (2005). Stability and change in ethnic groups in England and Wales. Population Trends, Autumn 125, 31–46. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160111181707/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/population-trends-rd/population-trends/no--121--autumn-2005/index.html 
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. (2008). Sociology’s causal confusion. In R. Groff (Ed.), Revitalizing causality: Realism about causality in philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 195–204). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., & Fiss, P. (2016). Intersectional inequality: Race, class, test scores and poverty. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D., & Imbens. (2015). Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruelle, D., & Takens, F. (1971). On the nature of turbulence. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Stross, C. (2014). The rhesus chart: A laundry files novel. Little, Brown Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1999). Single Case probabilities and the social world: The application of popper’s propensity interpretation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2003). The problem of representation: Realism and operationalism in survey research. Sociological Research On Line, 8(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/williams.html
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2011). Contingent realism—abandoning necessity. Social Epistemology, 25(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.534566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2019). Making up mechanisms in realist research. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 25–40). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Dyer, W. (2017). Complex realism in social research. Methodological Innovations Online, 10(2), 205979911668356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116683564
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Husk, K. (2013). Can we, should we measure ethnicity? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.682794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar