Stents: material, surface texture and design, in theory and practice

References

• Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 701–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotter CT, Judkins MP. Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction: description of a new technique, a preliminary report of its application. Circulation 1964; 59: 654–70.
   Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman DL, Leon M, Baim DS, et al. A randomised comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiemeneij F, Serruys PW, Macaya C et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1598–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Brauer H. In: Machraoui A, Grewe P, Fischer A, editors. Koronarstenting. Darmstadt: Steinkopff, 2001:17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brayda-Bruno M, Fini M, Pierini G et al. Evaluation of systemic metal diffusion after spinal pedicular fixation with titanium alloy and stainless steel system: a 36- month experimental study in sheep. Int J Artif Organs 2001; 24: 41–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams DF, Askill IN, Smith R. Protein adsorption and desorption phenomena on clean metal surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 313–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauerschmidt P, Schalldacher M. The electrochemical aspects of the thrombogenicity of a material. J Bioeng 1977; 1: 261–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bolz A, Schaldach M. Physikalische Mechanismen der Festkörper- Protein — Wechselwirkung an der Phasengrenze a-SIC:H. Biomed Tech 1992; 37: 244–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothman M, Serruys P, Grollier G, et al. Angiographic and clinical one-year follow-up of the Cordis tantalum coil stent in a multicenter international study demonstrating improved restenosis rates when com- pared to pooled PTCA and BENESTENT-I data: the European Antiplatelet Stent Investigation (EASI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 249–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castelman L, Motzkin S, Aricandri F. Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy an implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 10: 695–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryhanen J, Niemi E, Serlo W et al. Biocompatibility of nickel–titianium shape memory metal and its corrosion behaviour in human cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 35: 451–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewe PH, Machraoui A, Deneke T et al. Struk- turanalyse von 16 verschiedenen Koronarstents. Z Kardiol 1997: 86: 990–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franzen D, Nolte C, Haude M et al. Zeitverlauf und Charakteristika von Restenosen nach koronarer Stentimplantation bei asymptomatischen und symp- tomarmen Patienten. Z Kardiol 1994; 83: 155–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik N, Gunn J, Shepherd L et al. Phosphorylcholine- coated stents in porcine coronary arteries: in vivo assessment of biocompatibility. J Invasive Cardiol 2001; 13: 193–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelman ER, Seifert P, Groothuis A et al. Gold-coated NIR stents in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 2001; 103: 429–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheye S, Salame MY, Robinson KA et al. Short- and long-term histopathologic evaluation of stenting using a self-expanding nitinol stent in pig carotid and iliac arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 48: 316–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degenfeld VG, Heinrich D, Giehrl W, Boekstegers P. Comparison of Pura-Vario and Palmaz–Schatz stents following implantation using normal and high pressure in pigs: immediate and late results assessed by 3–dimensional IVUS. Z Kardiol 1999; 88: 906–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M et al. Does stent design affect probability of restenosis? A randomized trial comparing Multilink stents with GFX stents. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 378–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa MA, Sabate M, Kay IP et al. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasonic volumetric quantification of stent recoil and neointimal formation of two new generation tubular stents. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 135–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baim DS, Cutlip DE, Midei M et al. ASCENT Invesigators (ACS MultiLink Stent Clinical Equivalence in De Novo Lesions Trial). Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz– Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 157–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baim DS, Cutlip DE, O’Shaughnessy CD et al. NIRVANA Investigators (NIR Vascular Advanced North American Trial). Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz–Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 152–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes DR Jr, Lansky A, Kuntz R et al. The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz–Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1073–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Honda Y, Christie GL et al. Long-term vessel response to a self-expanding coronary stent: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the ASSURE Trial. A stent vs. stent ultrasound remodeling evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1329–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miketic S, Carlsson J, Tebbe U. Randomized com- parison of J&J Crown stent versus NIR stent after routine coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 2001; 42: E8.
   Google Scholar
• Harding SA, McKenna CJ, Flapan AD, Boon NA. Long- term clinical safety and efficacy of NIROYAL vs. NIR intracoronary stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54: 141–5. Nageh T, de Belder AJ, Thomas MR et al. A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL Study. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 971–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelbæk H, Jørgensen E, Jensen GVH et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after treatment with tubular stents. Final results of the DANSTENT study Eur Heart J 2001; 22(Suppl): 386.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Brown DL, Ischinger TA et al. Effect of stent design on reduction of elastic recoil. A comparison via quantitative intravascular ultrasound. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1999; 47: 251–7.
   Google Scholar
• Grewe PH, Deneke T, Müller K-M. Stent bedingte Veränderungen der Koronarmorphologie. Pathologisch- anatomische und experimentelle Befunde nach Ballonexpansion. Z Kardiol 2001; 90: 630–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danzi G, Fiocca L, Capuano C et al. Acute stent recoil: in vivo evaluation of different stent designs. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesslinger-Schweiger W. Elektropolieren in der Medizin- technik: 34. Jahrestagung der Dt. Gesell. für Galvano- technik und Oberflächentechnik e.V. Abstract 1996; 155–7.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2995–3000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michanetzis GP, Missirlis A. Flow dependent platelet behaviour in blood–material interactions. Biomed Technik 1992; 37: 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Grewe PH, Deneke T, Machraoui A et al. Coronary morphologic findings after stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 554–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Windecker S, Buddeberg F, Hubbell JA et al. Novel polymer stent coating for reduction of neointimal hyperplasia: poly-l-lysine with polyethylene glycol. Eur Heart J 2001; 22(Suppl): 483.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine A, Koelling K, Clay J. Decreased platelet adherence of polymer-coated tantalum stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5: 567–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giessen van der W, van Beusekom H, van Houten O et al. Coronary stenting with polymer-coated and uncoated self-expanding endoprostheses in pigs. Coronary Artery Dis 1992; 3: 631–40.
   Google Scholar
• Giessen van der W, Lincoff A., Schwartz R. Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 1996; 94: 1690–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staab ME, Holmes DR, Schwartz RS. Polymers. In: Sigwart U, editor. Endoluminal stenting. London: WB Saunders, 1996: 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Amon M, Bolz A, Schaldach M. Improvement of stenting therapy with a silicon coated tantalum stent. J Mater Med 1996; 7: 273–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grewe PH, Gutensohn K, Köster R et al. Führt die kovalente diamond-like carbon Oberflächenbeschich- tung von Koronarstents zu einer Reduktion der Thrombogenität? Z Kardiol 1998: 87(Suppl);152:630.
   Google Scholar
• Gutensohn K, Beythien C, Bau J et al. In vitro analyses of diamond-like carbon coated stents. Reduction of metal ion release, platelet activation and thrombogenicity. Thromb Res 2000; 99: 577–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar