Impact of stent design on clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation

References

• Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987; 19: 701–6.
   Google Scholar
• Karrillon GJ, Morice MC, Benveniste E et al. Intra- coronary stent implantation without ultrasound guidance and with replacement of conventional anticoagulation by antiplatelet therapy. 30–day clinical outcome of the French Multicenter Registry. Circulation 1996; 94: 1519–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershlick AH, Aggarwal RK. Stent thrombosis revisited. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 1623–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morice MC, Zemour G, Benveniste E et al. Intracoronary stenting without coumadin: one month results of a French multicenter study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 35: 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuhlen H, Hadamitzky M, Walter H et al. Major benefit from antiplatelet therapy for patients at high risk for adverse cardiac events after coronary Palmaz–Schatz stent placement: analysis of a prospective risk stratification protocol in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 2015–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastrati A, Schuhlen H, Hausleiter J et al. Restenosis after coronary stent placement and randomization to a 4-week combined antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: six-month angiographic follow-up of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) Trial. Circulation 1997; 96: 462–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Hall P, Gaglione A et al. High pressure assisted coronary stent implantation accomplished with- out intravascular ultrasound guidance and subsequent anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 21–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albiero R, Rau T, Schluter M et al. Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz–Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions. Circulation 1997; 96: 2997–3005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popma JJ. Stent selection in clinical practice: have clinical trials provided the evidence we need? Am Heart J 2001; 142: 378–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suselbeck T, Latsch A, Siri H et al. Role of vessel size as a predictor for the occurrence of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 243–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Holmes DR. Coronary artery stents. J Am Med Assoc 2000; 284: 1828–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T et al. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32: 1630–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann R, Mintz GS. Coronary in-stent restenosis — predictors, treatment and prevention. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1739–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS et al. Angiographic pattern of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100: 1872–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ommar MM, Dangas G, Iakovou I et al. Update on in- stent restenosis. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep 2001; 3: 296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Painter JA, Mintz GS, Wong SC et al. Serial intravascular ultrasound studies fail to show evidence of chronic Palmaz–Schatz stent recoil. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 398–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa MA, Sabate M, Kay IP et al. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasonic volumetric quantification of stent recoil and neointimal formation of two new generation tubular stents. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 135–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hong MK, Park SW, Lee CW et al. Intravascular ultrasound comparison of chronic recoil among different stent designs. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1247–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poerner T, Voelker W, Teubner J et al. Effect of high pressure balloon dilation upon the deployment of different coronary stents — an in vitro study using direct magnification radiography (Abstr.). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29 (Suppl. 1): 274A.
   Google Scholar
• Pörner T, Voelker W, Teubner J et al. Quantifying the recoil of coronary stents: an in vitro study with a coronary stenosis model using high resolution roentgen technique. Biomed Tech 1997; 42: 205–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barragan P, Rieu R, Garitey V et al. Elastic recoil of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50: 112–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Brown DL, Ischinger TA et al. Effect of stent design on reduction of elastic recoil: a comparison via quantitative intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 47: 251–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia LA, Hosley SE, Baim DS, Carrozza JP Jr. In vivo assessment of stent recoil in normal porcine arteries: evaluation of contemporary stent designs. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 277–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danzi G, Fiocca L, Capuano C et al. Acute stent recoil: in vivo evaluation of different stent designs. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieu R, Barragan P, Masson C et al. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 380–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garasic JM, Edelman ER, Squire JC et al. Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening indepen- dent of arterial injury. Circulation. 2000; 101: 812–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 2001; 103: 2816–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Dixon SR, Webster MW et al. Stent longitudinal flexibility: a comparison of 13 stent designs before and after balloon expansion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50: 120–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyöngyösi M, Yang P, Khorsand A et al. Longitudina l straightening of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1580–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmar G, Pörner T, Weigand C et al. Optimal expansion of the multi-link stent. An in vitro study with high resolution roentgen technique. Z Kardiol 1998; 87: 344–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG et al. Restenosis and proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 267–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas WJ, Laird JR, Bailey L et al. Experimental results with the Multi Link stent in a porcine model. J Invas Cardiol 1997; 9: 453–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poerner TC, Kralev S, Voelker W et al. Natural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 627–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho GY, Lee CW, Hong MK et al. Effects of stent design on side branch occlusion after coronary stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52: 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ormiston JA, Ruygrok PN, Webster MW et al. Mechanical properties of five long stents compared. J Invasive Cardiol. 1998; 10 (Suppl B): 35B.
   Google Scholar
• Han RO, Schwartz RS, Kobayashi Y et al. Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents for the reduction of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 253–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastrati A, Schomig A, Dirschinger J et al. Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000; 101: 2478–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutensohn K, Beythien C, Bau J et al. In vitro analysis of diamond-like carbon coated stents: reduction of metal ion release, platelet activation and thrombogenicity. Thromb Res 2000; 99: 577–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R, Bhargava B, Fuchs S et al. Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (. 25 mm) versus short (, 20 mm) stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 612–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann R, Jansen C, König A et al. Stent design related neointimal tissue proliferation in human coronary arteries — an intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 2007–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Boekstegers P et al. Influence of stent design on 1-year outcome after coronary stent placement: a randomized comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50: 290–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrati A, Mehili J, Dirschinger J et al. Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 34–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multicenter GRII Investigator Group. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the second generation Gianturco–Roubin (GRII) and the Palmaz–Schatz coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(Suppl): 170A.
   Google Scholar
• Menafoglio A, Eeckhout E, Debbas N et al. Randomized comparison of Micro Stent I with Palmaz–Schatz stent placement for the elective treatment of short coronary stenoses. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1998; 43: 403–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mehili J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J et al. A randomized trial comparing the hand-mounted JoStent with the premounted Multi-Link Duet stent in patients with coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54: 414–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nageh T, de Belder AJ, Thomas MR et al. A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the WallStent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL study. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 971–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M et al. Does stent design affect probability of restenosis? A randomized trial comparing Multilink stents with GFX stents. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 445–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar