References
- Cameron A, Davis KB, Green GE, Myers WO, et al. Clinical implications of internal mammaryartery bypass grafts: the CoronaryArtery SurgeryStudyExperience. Circulation 1988;77:815–9.
- Weiland AP, Walker WE. Physiologic principles and clinical sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart & Lung 1986;15:34–9.
- Ascione RL, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Lotto AA, Pitsis AA, et al. Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2237–42.
- Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, Grunwald GK, et al. Off-Pump CoronaryArteryBypass Is Associated With Improved Risk-Adjusted Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:114–9.
- Jarvinen O, Laurikka J, Tarkka M. R. Off-pump versus on-pump coronarybypass. Comparison of patient characteristics and earlyoutcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2003;44:167–72.
- Jatene FB, Fernandes PM, Stolf NA, Kalil R, et al. Minimally invasive myocardial bypass surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopy. Arq Bras Cardiol 1997; 68:107–11.
- Gerhardus D. Robot-assisted surgery: the future is here. J Healthc Manag 2003;48:242–51.
- Subramanian V, Fonger JD, ConnollyMW. Facilitated Vascular Anastomosis in Coronary Bypass Surgery. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2002;14:89–100.
- Klima U, Falk V, Maringka M, Bargenda S, et al. Magnetic vascular coupling for distal anastomosis in coronaryarterybypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1568–74.
- Klima U, Maringka M, Bagaev E, Kirschner S, et al. Total magnetic vascular coupling for arterial revascu- larisation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;127:602–3.
- Noar JH, Evans RD. Rare Earth Magnets in Orthodon- tics: An Overview. Brit J Orthodont 1999;26:29–37.
- Maniglia AJ, Ko WH, Rosenbaum M, Zhu WL, et al. A contactless electromagnetic implantable middle ear device for sensineuronal hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat Journal 1994; 73:78–82:84–8.
- Cope C, Clark TW, Ginsberg G, Habecker P. Stent placement of gastroenteric anastomoses formed by magnetic compression. J Vasc lntervent Radiol 1999; 10:1379–86.
- Takao S, Matsuo Y, Shinshi H, Nakajima S, et al. Mag- netic Compression Anastomosis for Benign Obstruc- tion of the Common Bile Duct. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 988–90.
- Gruneberger AD, Hennig GR, Bullemer F. A magnet system for urethral closure in females. J Biomed Eng 1984;6:102–6.
- Filsoui F, Farivar RS, Aklog L, Anderson CA, et al. Automated distal coronarybypass with a novel mag- netic coupler. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:in press.
- David JL, Limet R. Antiplatelet activityof clopidogrel in coronaryarterybypass graft surgerypatients. Thromb Haemost 1999;82:1417–21.
- Herbert JM, Dol F, Bernat A, Falotic R, Lale A, et al. The antiaggregating and antithrombotic activityof clopido- grel is potentiated byaspirin in several experimental models in the rabbit. Thromb Haemost 1998;80:512–8.
- Isom D, Maurer J. Costs and outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery: implications for reducing blood transfusion and administering aproti- nin. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6:202.
- Barrons RW, Jahr JS. A Review of Post-Cardiopulmon- aryBypass Bleeding. Aminocaproic Acid, Tranexamic Acid, and Aprotinin. Am J Ther 1996;3:821–38.