Principles and initial experience of a new device for dissection and hemostasis

References

• Metzelder M. L., Kubler J., Petersen C., Gluer S., et al. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in children: a prospective study on Ligasure versus Clip/Ligation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2006; 16: 241–4
   Google Scholar
• Lyons T. L., Winer W. K. An innovative bipolar instrument for laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 2005; 9: 39–41
   Google Scholar
• Wu M. P., Ou C. S., Chen S. L., Yen Y. E. T., et al. Complications and recommended practices for electrosurgery in laparoscopy. Am J of Surg 2000; 179: 67–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong A. M., Su L. M., Varkarakis I., Inagaki T., et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. J Urol 2004; 172: 1318–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith T. L., Smith J. M. Electrosurgery in Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck surgery:Principles, Advantages and Complications. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 769–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson K. B. New developments in radiofrequency technology for laparoscopic surgery. Contemporary Obst Gyn 2002; 4: 26–42
   Google Scholar
• Malis L. I. Electrosurgery and bipolar technology. Operative neurosurgery 2005; 58: 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Wright V. C. Contemporaray electrosurgery: physics for physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract 1994; 39: 119–22
   Google Scholar
• Phipps J. H. Understanding electrosurgery: safety and efficiency. Introduction to gynecological endoscopy, A Lower, C Sutton, G Grudzinskas. Isis Medical Media, Oxford UK 1996; 39–56
   Google Scholar
• Harold K. L., Pollinger H., Matthews B. D., Kercher K. W., et al. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolat termal energy, and vascular clips for hemostasis of small‐, medium‐, and large‐sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1228–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Targarona E. M., Balaque C., Marin J., Neto R. B., Martinez C., et al. Energy Sources for Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Conventional Electrosurgery, Bipolar Computer‐Controlled Electrosurgery and Ultrasonic Dissection. Operative Outcome and Costs Analysis. Surgical Innovation 2005; 12: 339–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heniford B. T., Matthews B. D., Sing R. F., Backus C. Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 2001; 5: 799–801
   Google Scholar
• Erian J., El‐Toukhy T., Chandakas S., Theodoridis T., et al. One hundred cases of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy using the PK and Lap Loop systems. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 365–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pietrow P. K., Weizer A. Z., L'Esperance J. O., Auge B. K., et al. PlasmaKinetic bipolar vessel sealing: burst pressures and thermal spread in an animal model. J Endourol 2005; 19: 107–10
   Google Scholar
• Landman J., Kerbl K., Rehman J., Andreoni C., et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 2003; 169: 697–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcello P. W., Roberts P. L., Rusin L. C., Holubkov R., et al. Vascular pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 263–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novitsky Y. W., Rosen M. J., Harrell A. G., Sing R. F., et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of the electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure) devices in sealing lymphatic vessels. Surg Innov 2005; 12: 155–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santa‐Cruz R. W., Auge B. K., Lallas C. D., Preminger G. M., et al. Use of bipolar laparoscopic forceps to occlude and transect the retroperitoneal vasculature: a porcine model. J Endourol 2003; 17: 181–5
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell A. M., Joels C. S., Kercher K. W., Matthews B. D., et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small‐, medium‐, and large‐sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003; 13: 377–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgrove A. C., Clark G. W. Laparoscopic gastric by pass, roux‐en‐Y:experience of 27 cases with 3–18 months follow‐up. Obes Surg 1996; 6: 54
   Google Scholar
• Wang C. J., Yuen L. T., Yen C. F., Lee C. L., et al. Comparison of the efficacy of the pulsed bipolar system and conventional bipolar electrosurgery in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; 15: 361–4
   Google Scholar
• Ou C. S., Joki J., Wells K., Zabriske V., et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using multifunction grasping, coagulating, and cutting forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004; 14: 67–71
   Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J., Tsivian A., Kumar A. V., Lymberakis C., et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1,000 operations. J Urol 2003; 169: 2072–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B., Cappele O., Martinez J. B., Navarra S., et al. Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans. J Urol 2001; 165: 1078–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solberg A., Angelsen A., Bergan U., Haugen O. A., et al. Frequency of lymphoceles after open and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003; 37: 218–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J., Marrero R., Hammady A., Erdogru T., et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ascending technique. J Endourol 2004; 18: 593–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrel A. G., Kercher K. W., Heniford B. T. Energy sources in laparoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004; 11: 201–9
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta S., Webb D. R. Use of a computer‐controlled bipolar dia thermy system in radical prostatectomies and other open urological surgery. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71: 538–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison J. D., Morris D. L. Artery weld strength after bipolar electrocoagulation is affected by electrolyte solutions around the artery. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 546–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboon J., Funkhouser W., Terris D. J. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser electrocautery and constant‐voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 379–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbons D. R., Southgate A. Comparison of wound‐healing and tissue effects using the Gyrus PlasmaKnife with monopolar, Coblation, and Harmonic Scalpel methodologies. Comp Clin pathol 2006; 15: 17–26
   Google Scholar
• Leinbach R. F., Markwell S. J., Colliver J. A., Lin S. Y. Hot versus cold tonsillectomy. A systematic review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 360–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlander J., Johansson K., Lindstrom S., Velin A. K., et al. Comparison of experimental nerve injury caused by ultrasonically activated scalpel and electrosurgery. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 772–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owaki T., Nakano S., Arimura K., Aikou T. The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 575–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donzelli J., Leonetti J. P., Wurster R. D., Lee J. M., et al. Neuroprotection due to irrigation during bipolar cautery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 149–53
   Google Scholar
• Gill I. S., Osamu U., Mauricio R., et al. Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:Refined technique. Urology 2005; 65: 23–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlering T., Skarecky B. S., Borin J. Impact of cautery‐free preservation of neurovascular bundles on early return of potency. J Endourology 2006; 20: 586–9
   Google Scholar
• Selli C., De Antoni P., Moro U., Macchiarella A., et al. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2004; 38: 32–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon V. E., Tavel F. R., Neuwirth H. Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1997; 158: 1470–5
   Google Scholar
• Mayooran Z., Pearce S., Tsaltas J., Rombauts L., et al. Ignorance of electrosurgery BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2004; 111: 1413–8
   Google Scholar
• Levy B., Emery L. Randomised trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obst Gynecol 2003; 102: 147–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar