Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – a review

References

• Cuschieri A. Whither Minimal Access Surgery: Tribulations and Expectations. American Journal of Surgery 1995; 169: 9–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno‐Egea A., Torralba J., Morales G., Fernandez T., et al. Laparoscopic Repair of Secondary Lumbar Hernias: Open Vs. Laparoscopic Surgery. A Prospective, Nonrandomized Study. Cirugia Espanola 2005; 77: 159–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dedemadi G., Sgourakis G., Karaliotas C., Christofides T., et al. Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Tension‐Free Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernias: A Prospective Randomized Study. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 1099–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumm A., Pizzi L., Goldfarb N., Cohn H. Minimally Invasive: Minimally Reimbursed? An Examination of Six Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures. Surgical Innovations 2005; 12: 261–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stefanoni M., Casciola L., Ceccarelli G., Spaziani A., et al. The Biliopancreatic Diversion. A Comparison of Laparoscopic and Laparotomic Techniques. Minerva Chirurgica 2006; 61: 205–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stassen H. G., Dankelman J., Grimbergen K. A., Meijer D. W. Man‐Machine Aspects of Minimally Invasive Surgery. Annual Reviews in Control 2001; 25: 111–22
   Google Scholar
• Dankelman J., Wentink M., Stassen H. G. Human Reliability and Training in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 2003; 12: 129–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voort M., Heijnsdijk E. A., Gouma D. J. Bowel Injury as a Complication of Laparoscopy. British Journal of Surgery 2004; 91: 1253–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa Barros M., Lozano F. S., Queral L. Vascular Injuries During Gynecological Laparoscopy – the Vascular Surgeon's Advice. Sao Paulo Medical Journal 2005; 123: 38–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marucci D. D., Cartmill J. A., Walsh W. R., Martin C. J. Patterns of Failure at the Instrument‐Tissue Interface. Journal of Surgery Research 2000; 93: 16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marucci D. D., Shakeshaft A. J., Cartmill J. A., Cox M. R., et al. Grasper Trauma During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Australian and New Zeeland Journal of Surgery 2000; 70: 578–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tendick F., Cavusoglu M. C. Human Machine Interfaces for Minimally Invasive Surgery. 1997; 2771–6, Proceedings – 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 1997 October 30 – November 2, 1997; Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Dutkiewicz P., Kielczewski M., Kowalski M. Visual Tracking of Surgical Tools for Laparoscopic Surgery. 2004; 23–8, InKozlowski K, editor. Proceedings – Fourth International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, RoMoCo'04; 2004; Puszczykowo
   Google Scholar
• Wentink M. Hand‐Eye Coordination in Minimally Invasive Surgery [PhD‐thesis]. Technical University Delft, Delft 2003
   Google Scholar
• DeLucia P., Mather R., Griswold J., Mitra S. Toward the Improvement of Image‐Guided Interventions for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Three Factors That Affect Performance. Human Factors 2006; 48: 23–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendick F., Jennings R. W., Tharp G., Stark L. Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis and Observation. Presence 1993; 2: 66–81
   Google Scholar
• Breedveld P., Stassen H. G., Meijer D. W., Jakimowicz J. J. Observation in Laparoscopic Surgery: Overview of Impeding Effects and Supporting Aids. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Technics 2000 Oct; 10((5))231–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedveld P., Hirose S. Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During Laparoscopic Surgery. Journal of mechanical design 2004; 126: 2–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhorst F. A. Affording Action, Implementing Perception‐Action Coupling for Endoscopy [PhD‐Thesis]. Technical University Delft, Delft 1998
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson E. R, Jr., Sankholkar S., Ducko C. T., Damiano R. J. J. r. Robotically Assisted Microsurgery for Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1998; 66: 1064–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr F. W., Falk V., Diegeler A., Walther T., et al. Computer‐Enhanced “Robotic” Cardiac Surgery: Experience in 148 Patients. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 2001; 121: 842–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedveld P., Stassen H. G., Meijer D. W., Jakimowicz J. J. Manipulation in Laparoscopic Surgery: Overview of Impeding Effects and Supporting Aids. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Technics 1999; 9: 469–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dario P., Hannaford B., Menciassi A. Smart Surgical Tools and Augmenting Devices. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2003; 19: 782–92
   Google Scholar
• Widmaier E. P., Hershel R., Strang K. T. Vander, Sherman, and Lucano's Human Physiology, the Mechanisms of Body Function. McGraw‐Hill, Boston 2004, 9th Ed. 9 ed.
   Google Scholar
• Lamata P., Gomez E. J., Sanchez‐Margallo F. M., Lamata F., et al. Tissue Consistency Perception in Laparoscopy to Define the Level of Fidelity in Virtual Reality Simulation. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 1368–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schostek S., Ho C. N., Kalanovic D., Schurr M. O. Artificial Tactile Sensing in Minimally Invasive Surgery – a New Technical Approach. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies 2006; 15: 296–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bholat O. S., Haluck R. S., Murray W. B., Gorman P. J., et al. Tactile Feedback Is Present During Minimally Invasive Surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1999; 189: 349–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnsdijk E. A., Pasdeloup A., van der Pijl A. J., Dankelman J., et al. The Influence of Force Feedback and Visual Feedback in Grasping Tissue Laparoscopically. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18: 980–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picod G., Jambon A. C., Vinatier D., Dubois P. What Can the Operator Actually Feel When Performing a Laparoscopy?. Surgical Endoscopy 2005; 19: 95–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Boer K. T., Herder J. L., Sjoerdsma W., Meijer D. W., et al. Sensitivity of Laparoscopic Dissectors, What Can You Feel?. Surgical Endoscopy 1999; 13: 869–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salle D., Gosselin F., Bidaud P., Gravez P. Analysis of Haptic Feedback Performances in Telesurgery Robotic Systems. 2001; 618–23, Proceedings – IEEE International Workshop – Robot and Human Communication 2001; Bordeaux‐Paris
   Google Scholar
• van den Dobbelsteen J. J., Schooleman A., Dankelman J. Friction Dynamics of Trocars. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 13: 6
   Google Scholar
• Toledo L., Gossot D., Fritsch S., Revillon Y., et al. [Study of Sustained Forces and the Working Space of Endoscopic Surgery Instruments]. Annales de chirurgie 1999; 53: 587–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen J., MacFarlane M., Richards C., Hannaford B., et al. Surgeon‐Tool Force/Torque Signatures–Evaluation of Surgical Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 1999; 62: 290–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjoerdsma W., Herder J. L., Horward M. J., Jansen A., et al. Force Transmission of Laparoscopic Grasping Instruments. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies 1997; 6: 274–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzer A., Kipfmuller K., Halfar B. Deflectable Endoscopic Instrument System Denis. Surgical Endoscopy 1997; 11: 1045–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman S. V., Jarzemski P. A., Listopadzki S. M., Lee B. R., et al. The Endohand: Comparison with Standard Laparoscopic Instrumentation. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 1999; 9: 253–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pijl A. J., Herder J. L. Development of 5mm‐Trocar Laparoscopic Forceps with Mechanical Force Feedback. 2001; 579–85, Proceedings – ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; 2001; Pittsburgh, PA
   Google Scholar
• Herder J. L., Horward M. J., Sjoerdsma W. A Laparoscopic Grasper with Force Perception. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies 1997; 6: 279–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz J. P. Rolling Link Mechanisms [Phd]. Delft Technical University, Delft 1995
   Google Scholar
• Balázs M., Feussner H., Hirzinger G., Omote K., et al. Replacing Mechanical Joints in Laparoscopic Forceps with Elastic Beams for Improved Pressure Control and Sensitivity: A New Tool for Minor‐Access Surgery. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 1998; 17: 45–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kota S., Lu K. J., Kreiner K., Trease B., et al. Design and Application of Compliant Mechanisms for Surgical Tools. Journal of biomechanical engineering 2005; 127: 981–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnsdijk E. A., Pasdeloup A., Dankelman J., Gouma D. J. The Optimal Mechanical Efficiency of Laparoscopic Forceps. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18: 1766–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall S. A., Brewster S. Sensory Substitution Using Tactile Pin Arrays: Human Factors, Technology and Applications. Signal Processing 2006; 86: 3674–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg G., Rosen B., Lindstrom K., Lindberg S. Artificial Sensibility Based on the Use of Piezoresistive Sensors. Preliminary Observations. Journal of Hand Surgery [Br] 1998; 23: 620–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasad S. K., Kitagawa M., Fischer G. S., Zand J., . A Modular 2‐Dof Force‐Sensing Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgery. R. E Ellis, T. M Peters, et al, 2003; 279–86, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2003; Montreal, Que.
   Google Scholar
• Dargahi J., Najarian S. An Integrated Force‐Position Tactile Sensor for Improving Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopic Surgery. Biomedical Material Engineering 2004; 14: 151–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H., Trapp R. Tactile Optical Sensor for Use in Minimal Invasive Surgery. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 1996; 29: 623–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer H., Trapp R., Schule L., Hoffmann B. Actuator Array for Use in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Journal De Physique IV : JP 1998; 7
   Google Scholar
• Yao H‐Y., Hayward V., Ellis R. E. A Tactile Enhancement Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Computer Aided Surgery 2005; 10: 233–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bicchi A., Canepa G., De Rossi D., Iacconi P., et al. Sensorized Minimally Invasive Surgery Tool for Detecting Tissutal Elastic Properties. 1996; 884–8, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 1996; Minneapolis, MN, USA: IEEE
   Google Scholar
• Ottermo M. V., Øvstedal M., Langø T., Stavdahl Ø., et al. The Role of Tactile Feedback in Laparoscopic Surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2006; 16: 390–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer G. S., Akinbiyi T., Saha S., Zand J., et al. Ischemia and Force Sensing Surgical Instruments for Augmenting Available Surgeon Information. 2006; 1030–5, Proceedings – IEEE/RAS‐EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2006; Pisa
   Google Scholar
• Valdastri P., Harada K., Menciassi A., Beccai L., et al. Integration of a Miniaturised Triaxial Force Sensor in a Minimally Invasive Surgical Tool. IEEE transactions on bio‐medical engineering 2006; 53: 2397–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley R. A., Howe R. D. Tactile Tracking of Arteries in Robotic Surgery. 2002; 3801–6, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2002; Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Sedaghati R., Dargahi J., Singh H. Design and Modeling of an Endoscopic Piezoelectric Tactile Sensor. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2005; 42: 5872–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plinkert P. K., Baumann I., Flemming E. Tactile Sensor for Tissue Differentiation in Minimally Invasive Ent Surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 1997; 76: 543–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura A. M. Methods for Haptic Feedback in Teleoperated Robot‐Assisted Surgery. Industrial Robotics 2004; 31: 499–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner C. R. Force Feedback in Surgery, Physical Constraints and Haptic Information [Phd thesis]. Harvard University, Cambridge 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wagner C. R., Stylopoulos N., Howe R. D. The Role of Force Feedback in Surgery: Analysis of Blunt Dissection. 2002; 68–74, Proceedings – 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hu T., Tholey G., Desai J. P., Castellanos A. E. Evaluation of a Laparoscopic Grasper with Force Feedback. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18: 863–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholey G., Desai J. P., Castellanos A. E. Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis. Annals of surgery 2005; 241: 102–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim H. G., Yip S. K., Cheng C. W. Equipment and Technology in Surgical Robotics. World journal of urology 2006; 24: 128–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimbergen C. A., Jaspers J. E. N. Robotics in Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2004; 2486–91, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2004; The Hague
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M., Patel R. V., Moallem M. Design Issues in a Haptics‐Based Master‐Slave System for Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2004; 371–6, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2004; New Orleans, LA
   Google Scholar
• Yokokohji Y., Yoshikawa T. Bilateral Control of Master‐Slave Manipulators for Ideal Kinesthetic Coupling – Formulation and Experiment. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1994; 10: 605–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks T. L. Telerobotic Response Requirements. 1990; 113–20, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 1990; Los Angeles, CA, USA: Publ by IEEE
   Google Scholar
• Massie T., Salisbury K. The Phantom Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Object., Proceedings – ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; 1994; Chicago, IL; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kazi A. Operator Performance in Surgical Telemanipulation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2001; 10: 495–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen J., Hannaford B., MacFarlane M. P., Sinanan M. N. Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery‐Experimental Performance Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1999; 46: 1212–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane M., Rosen J., Hannaford B., Pellegrini C., et al. Force‐Feedback Grasper Helps Restore Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1999; 3: 278–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demi B., Ortmaier T., Seibold U. The Touch and Feel in Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2005; 33–8, Proceedings – IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications; 2005; Ottawa, ON
   Google Scholar
• de Gersem G., van Brussel H., Tendick F. Reliable and Enhanced Stiffness Perception in Soft‐Tissue Telemanipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2005; 24: 805–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gersem G., van Brussel H., Tendick F. A New Optimization Function for Force Feedback in Teleoperation. 2003; 1354, Proceedings – International conference on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CARS); 2003 june; London UK
   Google Scholar
• Fritz E., GCaRQvdL. Haptic Gripper with Adjustable Inherent Passive Properties Eurohaptics; 2004; Munich Germany; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Morimoto A., Foral R., Kuhlman J., Zucker K., et al. Force Sensor for Laparoscopic Babcock. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 1997; 39: 354–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitagawa M., Dokko D., Okamura A. M., Yuh D. D. Effect of Sensory Substitution on Suture‐Manipulation Forces for Robotic Surgical Systems. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005; 129: 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa M., Dokko D., Okamura A. M., Bethea B. T., et al. Effect of Sensory Substitution on Suture Manipulation Forces for Surgical Teleoperation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004; 98: 157–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akinbiyi T., Okamura A. M., Yuh D. D. Dynamic Augmented Reality for Haptic Display in Robot – Assisted Surgical Systems. Proceedings – Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2005; 567–70
   Google Scholar
• Judkins T., Oleynikov D., Stergiou N. Real‐Time Augmented Feedback Benefits Robotic Laparoscopic Training. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2006; 119: 243–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bethea B. T., Okamura A. M., Kitagawa M., Fitton T. P., et al. Application of Haptic Feedback to Robotic Surgery. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Technics 2004; 14: 191–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M., Aziminejad A., Patel R. V., Moallem M. Methods and Mechanisms for Contact Feedback in a Robot‐Assisted Minimally Invasive Environment. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 1570–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M., Patel R. V., Moallem M. A Haptic Interface for Computer‐Integrated Endoscopic Surgery and Training. Virtual Reality 2006; 9: 160–76
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M., Patel R., Moallem M. Haptic Interaction in Robot‐Assisted Endoscopic Surgery: A Sensorized End Effector. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2005; 1: 53–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verner L. N., Okamura A. M. Sensor/Actuator Asymmetries in Telemanipulators: Implications of Partial Force Feedback. 2006; 309–14, Proceedings – 14th Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2006; Alexandria, VA
   Google Scholar
• Semere W., Kitagawa M., Okamura A. M. Teleoperation with Sensor/Actuator Asymmetry: Task Performance with Partial Force Feedback. 2004; 121–7, Proceedings – 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS; 2004; Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Verner L. N., Jeung K., Okamura A. M. The Effects of Gripping and Translational Forces on Teleoperation. Springer Tracks in Advanced Robotics 2005; 18: 231–42
   Google Scholar
• Verner L. N., Okamura A. Effects of Translational and Gripping Force Feedback Are Decoupled in a 4‐Degree‐of‐Freedom Telemanipulator. 2007; 286–91, Proceedings – Second Joint EuroHaptics – Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07) 2007; Tsukuba (Japan)
   Google Scholar
• Cao C. G. L., Webster J. L., Perreault J. O., Schwaitzberg S. D., et al. Visually Perceived Force Feedback in Simulated Robotic Surgery. 2003; 1466–70, Proceedings – 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
   Google Scholar
• Berguer R., Smith W. An Ergonomic Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique: The Influence of Surgeon Experience and Task Complexity. Journal of Surgical Research 2006; 134: 87–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois P., Thommen Q., Jambon A. C. In Vivo Measurement of Surgical Gestures. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2002; 49: 49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottensmeyer M. P., Ben‐Ur E., Salisbury J. K. Input and Output for Surgical Simulation: Devices to Measure Tissue Properties in Vivo and a Haptic Interface for Laparoscopy Simulators. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2000; 70: 236–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter T. J., Sermesant M., Cash D. M., Barratt D. C., et al. Application of Soft Tissue Modelling to Image‐Guided Surgery. Medical Engineering and Physics 2005; 27: 893–909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter F. J., Frank T. G., Davies P. J., McLean D., et al. Measurements and Modelling of the Compliance of Human and Porcine Organs. Medical Image Analysis 2001; 5: 231–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer I., Ustin J., Bentley L., Sherman A., et al. Measuring in Vivo Animal Soft Tissue Properties for Haptic Modeling in Surgical Simulation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2001; 81: 69–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basdogan C., De S., Kim J., Muniyandi M., Kim H., et al. Haptics in Minimally Invasive Surgical Simulation and Training. 2004, Proceedings – Haptic rendering – Beyond visual computing; 2004 march april: IEEE Computer Society
   Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu M. C., Tendick F. Multirate Simulation for High Fidelity Haptic Interaction with Deformable Objects in Virtual Environments. 2000; 2458–65, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2000); 2000 April 24–28, 2000; San Francisco, CA
   Google Scholar
• Schijven M., Jakimowicz J. Virtual Reality Surgical Laparoscopic Simulators. Surgical Endoscopy 2003; 17: 1943–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner C. R., Howe R. D. Mechanisms of Performance Enhancement with Force Feedback. First Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2005; 21–9
   Google Scholar
• Ström P., Hedman L., Sarna L., Kjellin A., et al. Early Exposure to Haptic Feedback Enhances Performance in Surgical Simulator Training: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Surgical Residents. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; 20: 1383–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtsma A., Keuning H. Can Augmented Force Feedback Facilitate Virtual Target Acquisition Tasks?. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2006; 119: 207–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acosta E., Temkin B. Haptic Laparoscopic Skills Trainer with Practical User Evaluation Metrics. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2005; 111: 8–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou W., Wang T. Human‐Computer Interactive Simulation for the Training of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2003; 1110–5, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2003; Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Maass H., Chantier B. B., Cakmak H. K., Trantakis C., et al. Fundamentals of Force Feedback and Application to a Surgery Simulator. Computer Aided Surgery 2003; 8: 283–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu H., Hourie C., Eagleson R., Patel R. A Haptics Based Simulator for Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2006; 119: 583–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aschwanden C., Sherstyuk A., Burgess L., Montgomery K. A Surgical and Fine‐Motor Skills Trainer for Everyone? Touch and Force‐Feedback in a Virtual Reality Environment for Surgical Training. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2005; 119: 19–21
   Google Scholar
• Gerovich O., Marayong P., Okamura A. M. The Effect of Visual and Haptic Feedback on Computer‐Assisted Needle Insertion. Computer Aided Surgery 2004; 9: 243–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbagli F., Salisbury K. The Effect of Sensor/Actuator Asymmetries in Haptic Interfaces. 2003; 140–7, Proceedings – 11th Symp Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems
   Google Scholar
• den Boer K. T., de Jong T., Dankelman J., Gouma D. J. Problems with Laparoscopic Instruments: Opinions of Experts. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2001; 11: 149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley I., McGee M. R., Brewster S., Gray P. Putting the Feel in ‘Look and Feel’. 2000; 415–22, Proceedings – Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2000; The Hague, Neth: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Lessard J., Robert J‐M., Rondot P. Evaluaton of Working Techniques Using Teleoperation for Power Line Maintenance. 1995; 88–98, Proceedings – SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering; 1995; Boston, MA, USA: Society of Photo‐Optical Instrumentation Engineers
   Google Scholar
• Chou W., Wang T. The Design of Multimodal Human‐Machine Interface for Teleoperation. 2001; 3187–92, Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2001; Tucson, AZ
   Google Scholar
• Massimino M. J. Improved Force Perception through Sensory Substitution. Control Engineering Practice 1995; 3: 215–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massimino M. J., Sheridan T. B. Sensory Substitution for Force Feedback in Teleoperation. 1993; 109–14, In: Stassen H. G, ed. Proceedings – IFAC Symposia Series; 1993; Hague, Neth: Publ by Pergamon Press Inc
   Google Scholar
• Debus T., Jang T. J., Dupont P., Howe R. Multi‐Channel Vibrotactile Display for Teleoperated Assembly. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 2004; 2: 390–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard P., Coiffet P. Human Perceptual Issues in Virtual Environments: Sensory Substitution and Information Redundancy. 1995; 301–6, Proceedings – IEEE International Workshop Robot and Human Communication – 1995; Tokyo, Jpn
   Google Scholar
• Richard P., Coiffet P. Dextrous Haptic Interaction in Virtual Environments: Human Performance Evaluations. 1999; 315–20, Proceedings – IEEE International Workshop Robot and Human Communication 1999; Pisa
   Google Scholar
• Lamata P., Gomez E. J., Sanchez‐Margallo F. M., Lamata F., et al. Study of Laparoscopic Forces Perception for Defining Simulation Fidelity. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2006; 119: 288–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar