Potential applications of medical and non-medical robots for neurosurgical applications

References

• Taylor R. Robotics in Orthopaedic Surgery. Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Nolte, Ganz. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle 1998; 35–41
   Google Scholar
• Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A perspective. Journal of Bio mechanics 2007; 40: :728–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR. Robotic Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 2003; 13: 451–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cotton PB, Williams CB. Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - The Fundamentals. Oxford. 1990
   Google Scholar
• Kassim I, Phee L, Ng WS, Gong F, et al. Locomotion techniques for robotic colonoscopy. Proceedings of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2006; 25: 49–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayaty S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE, Biomedical Engineering 1988; 35: 153–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabid AL, Cinquin P, Lavalle S, Le Bas JF, et al. Computer-driven robot for stereotactic surgery connected to CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging: technological design and preliminary results. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1987; 50: 153–4
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland GR, McBeth PB, Louw DF. Mobile intraoperative MRI in neurosurgery at 1.5 T. International Congress Series, Elsevier Science B.V. 2003; 1256: 613–8
   Google Scholar
• McBeth PB, Louw DF, Rizun PR, Sutherland GR. Robotics in neurosurgery. The American Journal of Surgery 2004; 188: 68S–75S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum MJH, Rosen J, King H, Friedman DCW, et al. Telesurgery Via Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a Field Deployable Surgical Robot. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 125: 313–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, Kolyvas G, et al. Robotic Long-distance Telementoring in Neurosurgery. Source Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 434–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson E. Surgical simulators and simulated surgeons: reconstituting medical practice and practitioners in simulations. Social Studies of Science 2007; 37: 585–608
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soler L, Marescaux J. Patient-specific Surgical Simulation. World Journal of Surgery 2008; 32: 208–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pransky J. Surgeons’ realizations of RoboDoc. Industrial Robot. M.C.B. University Press. 1998; 25: 105–8
   Google Scholar
• Davies B, Harris S, Jakopec M, Cobb J. A Novel Hands-on Robot for Knee Replacement Surgery. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery CAOS USA; Shadyside Hospital, PennsylvanniaUSA, 1999, 70–4
   Google Scholar
• Kwon DS, Yoon YS, Lee JJ, Ko SY, et al. ARTHROBOT: A New Surgical Robot System for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; Maui, Hawaii 2001; 2: 1123–8
   Google Scholar
• Wolf A, Jaramaz B, Lisien B, Digioia AM. MBARS : mini bone-attached robotic système for joint arthroplasty. Int J Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2005; 1: 101–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt G, Zimolong A, Carrat L, Merloz P, et al. CRIGOS: a compact robot for image-guided orthopedic surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE, Information Technology in Biomedicine 1999; 3: 252–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavusoglu MC, Villanueva I, Tendick F. Workspace Analysis of Robotic Manipulators for a Teleoperated Suturing Task. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS; Maui, Hawaii 2001; 4: 2234–9
   Google Scholar
• Rininsland H. ARTEMIS A telemanipulator for cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 1999; 16: S106-–S111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer H, Nagy I, Knoll A, Schirmbeck EU, et al. The Endo[PA]R system for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS 2004; 4: 3637–42
   Google Scholar
• Mitsuishi M, Arata J, Tanaka K, Miyamoto M, et al. Developement of a Remote Minimally-Invasive Surgical System with Operational Environment Transmission Capability. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA; Taipei, Taiwan 2003; 2: 2663–70
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang Y, Wang T, Xing H, et al. NeuroMaster: A Robot System for Neurosurgery. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics & Automation; New Orleans, United States 2004; 1: 824–8
   Google Scholar
• Finlay PA, Morgan P. PathFinder image guided robot for neurosurgery. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 2003; 30: 30–4
   Google Scholar
• Li QH, Zamorano L, Pandya A, Perez R, et al. The Application Accuracy of the NeuroMate Robot - A Quantitative Comparison with Frameless and Frame-Based Surgical Localization Systems. Computer Aided Surgery 2002; 7: 90–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hongo K, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, Kan K, et al. Microscopic-manipulator system for minimally invasive neurosurgery : preliminary study for clinical application. Proceedings of the International Congress Series 2001; 1230: 275–80
   Google Scholar
• Hongo K, Goto T, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, et al. Micromanipulator system (NeuRobot): clinical application in neurosurgery. Proceedings of the International Congress Series 2003; 1256: 509–13
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland GR, Mcbeth PB, Louw DF. NeuroArm: an MR compatible robot for microsurgery. International Congress Series 2003; 1256: 504–8
   Google Scholar
• Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E, Joskowicz L. Bone-Mounted Miniature Robot for Surgical. Proceedings of the IEEE, Transactions on Robotics and Automation ICRA; Taipei, Taiwan 2003; 19: 893–901
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Nokata M, Aritomi S. Hyper redundant active endoscope for minimum invasive surgery. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery MRCAS, PittsburghUnited States, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Nokata M. Two-lead-wire drive for multi-micro actuators. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA;, DetroitUnited States, 1999, 2378–84
   Google Scholar
• Sallé D. Conception Optimale d'Instruments Robotisés à Haute Mobilités pour la Chirurgie Mini-Invasive. Ph.D. Thesis: Université Paris 6, Paris, France; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Das H, Ohm T, Boswell C, Steele R, et al. Robot assisted microsurgery development at JPL. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, ChicagoUnited States, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Seibold U, Kübler B, Hirzinger G. Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA, BarcelonaSpain, 2005, 498–503
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Hasegawa T, Daifu S. Hyper Redundant Miniature Manipulator ”Hyper Finger” for Remote Minimally Invasive Surgery in Deep Area. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA; Taipei, Taiwan 2003; 1: 1098–102
   Google Scholar
• Ikuta K, Yamamoto K, Sasaki K. Developement of Remote Micro-surgery Robot and New Surgical Procedure for Deep and Narrow Space. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA; Taipei, Taiwan 2003; 1: 1103–8
   Google Scholar
• Nawrat Z, Podsedkowski L, Mianowski K, Wroblewski P, et al. Robin Heart 2003 - present state of the Polish telemanipulator project for cardiac surgery assistance. Int. J. Artif Organs 2003; 26: 1115–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dario P, Carrozza MC, Marcacci M, Daposattanasio S, et al. A Novel Mechatronic Tool for Computer-Assisted Arthroscopy. Proceedings of the IEEE, Information Technology in Biomedicine 2000; 4: 15–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita H, Kim D, Hata N, Dohi T. Multi-Slider Linkage Mechanism for Endoscopic Forceps Manipulator. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS; Las Vegas, United States 2003; 32: 577–82
   Google Scholar
• Gagarina-Sasia T, Desars V, Szewczyk J. Robot Modulaire pour l'Inspection Endo-Chirurgicale. Proceedings of the “17ème Congrès Français de Mécanique”;, TroyesFrance, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Reynaerts D, Peirs J, Vanbrussel H. Shape memory micro-actuation for a gastro-intestinal intervention system. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 1999; 77: 157–66
   Google Scholar
• Raju GS, Pasricha PJ. ShapeLock: a rapid access port for redeployment of a colonoscope into the proximal colon to facilitate multiple polypectomies in a single session. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61: 768–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatkin AB, Burdick J, Grundfest W. The development of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots; Pittsburgh, United States 1995; 2: 162–71
   Google Scholar
• Menciassi A, Park JH, Lee S, Gorini S, et al. Robotic solutions and mechanisms for a semi-autonomous endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System IROS; Lausanne, Switzerland 2002; 2: 1379–84
   Google Scholar
• Kim B, Lim HY, Park JH, Park JO. Inchworm-Like Colonoscopic Robot with Hollow Body and Steering Device. JSME International Journal 2006; Series C:49: 205–12
   Google Scholar
• Ng WS, Phee SJ, Seow C, Davies BL. Development of a robotic colonoscope. Digestive Endoscopy 2000; 12: 131–5
   Google Scholar
• Mangan EV, Kingsley DA, Quinn RD, Chiel HJ. Development of a peristaltic endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA 2002; 1: 347–52
   Google Scholar
• Breedveld P, Scheltes JS, Blom EM, Verheij JEI. A New, Easily Miniaturized Steerable Endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology; Shanghai, China 2005; 40–7
   Google Scholar
• Choi DG, Yi BJ, Kim WK. Design of a Spring Backbone Micro Endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS 2007; 1815–21
   Google Scholar
• Degani A, Choset H, Wolf A, Zenati MA. Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA 2006; 4167–72
   Google Scholar
• Thomann G. Contribution à la chirurgie minimalement invasive : Conception d'un coloscope intelligent. Ph.D. Thesis: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, Lyon, France, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bailly Y. Modélisation et commande d'un micro-robot hybride - Application à la pose d'endoprothèses aortiques en chirurgie mini-invasive. Ph.D. Thesis: Université Paris 12, Val de Marne, France; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Chen G. Design, modeling and control of a micro-robotic tip for colonoscopy. Ph.D. Thesis: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, Lyon, France; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Hannan MW, Walker ID. Kinematics and the implementation of an elephant's trunk manipulator and other continuum style robots. J Robot Syst. 2003; 20: 45–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane DM, Davies JBC, Robinson G, Oapos Brien DJ, et al. The AMADEUS dextrous subsea hand: design, modeling, and sensorprocessing. Proceedings of the IEEE, Journal of Oceanic Engineering 1999; 24: 96–111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan W, Chitrakaran V, Csencsits M, Dawson D, et al. Field Trials and Testing of the OctArm Continuum Manipulator. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA; Orlando, Florida 2006; 2336–41
   Google Scholar
• McMahan W, Jones BA, Walker ID. Design and implementation of a multi-section continuum robot: Air-Octor. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS; 2005; 2578–85
   Google Scholar
• Slagowski S, Potter A. Using ADAMS to Model Cable Driven Hyper-Redundant Flexible Manipulators. International ADAMS User Conference; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Blessing M, Walker ID. Novel Continuum Robots with Variable-Length Sections. Proceedings of the 3rd IFAC Symposium on Mechatronic Systems; Sydney, Australia 2004; 55–60
   Google Scholar
• D'attanasio S, Tonet O, Megali G, ,Carrozza MC, et al. A semi-automatic handheld mechatronic endoscope with collision-avoidance capabilities. Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA; San Francisco, United States 2000; 2: 1586–91
   Google Scholar
• Bidaud P, Guinot JC. Design and control of micro robotic systems for micro-manipulation and minimally invasive surgery. Journal de Physique IV France (EDP Sciences) Les Ulis 2002; 12: 19–25
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle F, Bidaud P. Evaluation functions synthesis for optimal design of hyper-redundant robotic systems. IFToMM Mechanism and Machine Theory 2006; 41: 1196–212
   Google Scholar
• Menciassi A, Dario P. Bio-inspired solutions for locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract: background and perspectives. Royal Society of London Transactions; 2003; Series A;361: 2287–98
   Google Scholar
• Dombre E. Introduction to Medical Robotics. Proceedings of the 3^rd Summer School on Surgical Robotics; Montpellier, France; 2007
   Google Scholar