343
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Does minimally invasive fusion technique influence surgical outcomes in isthmic spondylolisthesis?

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 33-40 | Received 19 Sep 2017, Accepted 19 Feb 2018, Published online: 28 Sep 2018

References

  • Barbagallo GM, Certo F, Sciacca G, et al. Bilateral tubular minimally invasive approach for decompression, reduction and fixation in lumbosacral lythic spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2013:Video 9.
  • Barbagallo GM, Piccini M, Alobaid A, et al. Bilateral tubular minimally invasive surgery for low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS): analysis of a series focusing on postoperative sagittal balance and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2014;23:705–713.
  • Bourghli A, Aunoble S, Reebye O, et al. Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:663.
  • Feng Y, Chen L, Gu Y, et al. Influence of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the sagittal spino-pelvic parameters in isthmic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2014;27:E20–E25.
  • Feng Y, Chen L, Gu Y, et al. Restoration of the spinopelvic sagittal balance in isthmic spondylolisthesis: posterior lumbar interbody fusion may be better than posterolateral fusion. Spine J. 2015;15:1527–1535.
  • Jagannathan J, Sansur CA, Oskouian Jr RJ, et al. Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 2009;64:955–964.
  • Jin-Tao Q, Yu T, Mei W, et al. Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1058–1065.
  • Khan NR, Clark AJ, Lee SL, et al. Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2015;77:847–874.
  • Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2265–2270.
  • Peng CWB, Yue WM, Poh SY, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2009;34:1385–1389.
  • Seng C, Siddiqui MA, Wong KP, et al. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study. Spine 2013;38:2049–2055.
  • Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, et al. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1780–1784.
  • Archavlis E, Nievas MC. Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1731–1740.
  • Kim JY, Park JY, Kim KH, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: comparison between isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:1284–1293.
  • Lv Y, Chen J, Chen J, et al. Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26:168–176.
  • Recnik G, Košak R. Influencing segmental balance in isthmic spondylolisthesis using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2013;26:246–251.
  • Maciejczak A, Jabłońska K, Bączek D, et al. Changes in spino-pelvic alignment after surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska. 2014;48:21–29.
  • Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5–S1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2006;31:2484–2490.
  • Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99–103.
  • Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 2009;34:1828–1833.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.