Enabling artificial intelligence in high acuity medical environments

References

• Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powles J, Hodson H. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7:351–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best J. Playing House: how IBM’s Watson is helping doctors diagnose the most rare and elusive illnesses. ZDNet.com 08-Nov-2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.zdnet.com/article/playing-house-how-ibms-watson-is-helping-doctors-diagnose-the-most-rare-and-elusive-illnesses/. [Accessed 2018 Sep 21].
   Google Scholar
• Maier-Hein L, Vedula S, Speidel S, et al. Surgical data science for next-generation interventions. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:691–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke H, Vannier M. The operating room and the need for an IT infrastructure and standards. Int J CARS. 2006;1:117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Belle A, Thiagarajan R, Soroushmehr SMR, et al. Big data analytics in healthcare. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Qiu M, Tsai C-W, et al. Health-CPS: healthcare cyber-physical system assisted by cloud and big data. IEEE Syst J. 2017;11:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014;2:3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Elenee Argentinis J, Weber G. IBM Watson: how cognitive computing can be applied to big data challenges in life sciences research. Clin Ther. 2016;38:688–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov DV. Medical internet of things and big data in healthcare. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22:156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasparick M, Schmitz M, Andersen B, et al. OR.NET: a service-oriented architecture for safe and dynamic medical device interoperability. Biomed Eng/Biomed Tech. 2018;63:11–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichting S, Pöhlsen S. An architecture for distributed systems of medical devices in high acuity environments – a proposal for standards adoption. in: HL7, 2014. 11073/HL7 Standards Week, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• OASIS. Devices Profile for Web Services Version 1.1 – OASIS Standard. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-dd/dpws/1.1/os/wsdd-dpws-1.1-spec-os.html. [Accessed 2017 Mar 13].
   Google Scholar
• Kasparick M, Schlichting S, Golatowski F, et al. Medical DPWS: new IEEE 11073 standard for safe and interoperable medical device communication. 2015 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN); Tokyo, Japan; 2015. p. 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Kasparick M, Andersen B. Offene Standards im vernetzten Operationssaal. Elektronik Praxis. 2016;14:62–64, Vogel Business Media GmbH & Co. KG, Würzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bender D, Sartipi K. HL7 FHIR: an agile and RESTful approach to healthcare information exchange. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2013 IEEE 26th International Symposium; Porto, Portugal; 2013. p. 326–331.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14199 – health informatics – information models – Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) Model. 2015. Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE). IHE ITI technical framework supplement: Mobile Cross-Enterprise Document Data Element Extraction (mXDE) Rev. 1.2. Aug 2017. Oak Brook, Illinois, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2015;2015:234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Cypko MA, Stoehr M, Kozniewsk M, et al. Validation workflow for a clinical Bayesian network model in multidisciplinary decision making in head and neck oncology treatment. Int J CARS. 2017;12:1959–1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, et al. Explainable machine learning predictions to help anesthesiologists prevent hypoxemia during surgery. bioRxiv. 2017. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. doi:10.1101/206540.
   Google Scholar
• Franke S, Rockstroh M, Hofer M, et al. The intelligent OR: design and validation of a context-aware surgical working environment. Int J CARS. 2018;13:1301–1308.
   Google Scholar
• Neumuth T. Surgical process modeling. Innov Surg Sci. 2017;2:123–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katić D, Wekerle A-L, Gärtner F, et al. Knowledge-driven formalization of laparoscopic surgeries for rule-based intraoperative context-aware assistance. Inf Process Comput Assist Interv. 2014;2014:158–167.
   Google Scholar
• Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, et al. Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal. 2012;16:632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twinanda AP, Shehata S, Mutter D, et al. EndoNet: a deep architecture for recognition tasks on laparoscopic videos. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36:86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauder R, Ostler D, Vogel T, et al. Surgical data processing for smart intraoperative assistance systems. Innov Surg Sci. 2017;2:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katić D, Julliard C, Wekerle AL, et al. LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition. Int J CARS. 2015;10:1427–1434.
   Google Scholar
• Franke S, Neumuth T. Rule-based medical device adaptation for the digital operating room. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Milan, Italy. 2015; p. 1733–1736.
   Google Scholar
• Deo RC. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015;132:1920–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar