Can effective pedagogy be ensured in minimally invasive surgery e-learning?

References

• Oropesa I, Sánchez-González P, Lamata P, et al. Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 2011;171:e81–e85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, et al. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ. 2003;327:1032–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuder HWR, Oei G, Maas M, et al. Implementation of simulation in surgical practice: Minimally invasive surgery has taken the lead: the Dutch experience. Med Teach. 2011;33:105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dankelman J, Chmarra MK, Verdaasdonk EGG, et al. Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14:247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood TC, Raison N, Haldar S, et al. Training tools for nontechnical skills for surgeons – a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:548–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani A, Vassiliou MC, Watanabe Y, et al. What are the principles that guide behaviors in the operating room?: creating a framework to define and measure performance. Ann Surg. 2017;265:255–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, et al. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1428–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Cabrero B, Hoover ML, Lajoie SP, et al. Design of a learning-centered online environment: a cognitive apprenticeship approach. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2018;66:813–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole G, Dyke M, Oliver M, et al. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Comput. Educ. 2004;43:17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Filiz Aİ, et al. Comparison of new era’s education platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3472–3477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can U, Narter F. Are the video surgery platforms useful and preferable for urologist? South Clin Istanbul Eurasia. 2018;30:33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné RM, Wager WW, Golas K, et al. Principles of instructional design. 5th ed. Belmont (CA): Thomson/Wadsworth; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Honebein PC. Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In Wilson B, editor. Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design. New York: Educational Technology; 1996. p. 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carr-Chellman A, Duchastel P. The ideal online course. Br J Educ Technol. 2000;31:229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs KH, Babic B, Breithaupt W, et al.; European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1753–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi B, editor. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. p. 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Oropesa I, Chmarra MK, Vapenstad C, et al. A pedagogically-supported TEL solution for learning nontechnical minimally invasive surgical skills across Europe. In: Campos RJ, Caminal Magrans P, Giraldo Giraldo BF, et al., editors. Proceedings of the XXXII Congress of the Spanish Society of Biomedical Engineering. Vol. 704. Barcelona (Spain): Spanish Society of Biomedical Engineering; 2014. p. 1–4. Available from: http://seib.org.es/descarga/comunicaciones-caseib-2014/
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Gonzalez P, Oropesa I, Garcia-Novoa J, et al. AMELIE: Authoring Multimedia-Enhanced Learning Interactive Environment for medical contents. Stud Heal Technol Inf. 2013;190:68–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolb D. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. J Organ Behav. 1984;8:359–360.
   Google Scholar
• Romero M, Usart M. The time factor in MOOCS time-on-task, interaction temporal patterns, and time perspectives in a MOOC. In: Zvacek S, Restivo MT, Uhomoibhi JO, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Setubal (Portugal): SciTePress; 2014. p. 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, Kraiger K, et al. The science of training and development in organizations: what matters in practice. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13:74–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Vela E. Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8:203–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilici JL, Mayer RE. Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. J Educ Psychol. 1996;88:144–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori E, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, et al.; Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO). Learning climate and quality of Italian training courses in gynecology and obstetrics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;241:13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoor SM, Våpenstad C, Mårvik R, et al. Construct validity of eoSim – a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, Caruso S, Vitagliano A, et al. The value of virtual reality simulators in hysteroscopy and training capacity: a systematic review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt CI, Birdi N, Mafeld S, et al. The role of simulation in the development of endovascular surgical skills. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar