Outcomes and hemodynamics of Enable bioprosthesis in 432 patients: an afterword

References

• Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP, Rabil PJ, et al. In the beginning. Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;47(3):475–476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, et al. German Heart Surgery Report 2018: the annual updated registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67(5):331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Lind BK, Kitzman DW, et al. Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Sa MPB, Cavalcanti LRP, Perazzo AM, et al. Calcific aortic valve stenosis and atherosclerotic calcification. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22(2):2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefers H-J, Boehm M. Ursachen und Behandlungsstrategien der Aortenklappeninsuffizienz. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2004;101:A-2475.
   Google Scholar
• Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson E, Legedza ATR, Hamel MB. Decision-making and outcomes in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:312–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, et al. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. the Tromsø study. Heart. 2013;99(6):396–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(4):616–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2015;385(9986):2485–2491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ T, Zhigalov K, Konertz W, et al. Clinical outcome and hemodynamic behavior of the Labcor Dokimos Plus aortic valve. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11(1):160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silaschi M, Conradi L, Treede H, et al. Trends in surgical aortic valve replacement in more than 3,000 consecutive cases in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;64(05):382–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christ T, Holinski S, Zhigalov K, et al. Hemodynamics of pericardial aortic valves: contemporary stented versus stentless valves in a matched comparison. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(6):298–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa M, Perazzo AM, Zhigalov K, et al. Aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) – a promising surgical technique. Brazil J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34:610–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easo J, Weymann A, Hölzl P, et al. hospital results of a single center database for stentless xenograft use in a full root technique in over 970. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takagi H, Umemoto T. A meta-analysis of sutureless or rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;64(05):400–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhigalov K, Khokhlunov M, Szczechowicz M, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(1):e17–e19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Thielmann M, Pizanis N, et al. Sutureless aortic valves over the last 45 years. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2009;18(3):122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JL, Ad N, Myers K, et al. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design-preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(2):520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Thielmann M, Buck T, et al. First clinical experience and 1-year follow-up with the sutureless 3F-Enable aortic valve prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(4):542–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aymard T, Kadner A, Walpoth N, et al. Clinical experience with the second-generation 3F Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(2):313–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens S, Ploss A, Sirat S, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(6):1914–1917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski J, Kapelak B, Pfitzner R, et al. Sutureless aortic valve bioprothesis ‘3F/ATS Enable’ – 4.5 years of a single-centre experience. Kardiol Pol. 2009;67(8A):956–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalabi A, Raanani E, Shinfeld A, et al. Sutureless aortic valve: early and mid-term results at a single center. Isr Med Assoc J. 2016;18:119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuhle S, Wendt D, Hou G, et al. Fluid dynamic investigation of the ATS 3F Enable sutureless heart valve. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6(1):37–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichstaedt HC, Easo J, Harle T, et al. Early single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):370–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bauer T, et al. Trends in practice and outcomes from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42 776 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(3):552–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, et al. German Heart Surgery Report 2017: the annual updated registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(8):608–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englberger L, Carrel TP, Doss M, et al. Clinical performance of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year results of the 3F Enable long-term follow-up study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4):1681–1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzellier JF, Campisi S, Gerbay A, et al. two hundred consecutive implantations of the sutureless 3f enable aortic valve: what we have learned. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(5):1716–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashhour A, Zhigalov K, Szczechowicz M, et al. Snugger method – the Oldenburg modification of perceval implantation technique. World J Cardiol. 2018;10(9):119–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczechowicz M, Mashhour A, Chaduneli O, et al. Implantation of perceval valve in mitral position: a new technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(1):225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vola M, Campisi S, Gerbay A, et al. Sutureless prostheses and less invasive aortic valve replacement: just an issue of clamping time? Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(5):1518–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konertz J, Zhigalov K, Weymann A, et al. Initial experience with aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: a comparison of stented, stentless and sutureless valves. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:1645–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensminger S, Fujita B, Bauer T, et al. Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(13):1417–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Shehada S-E, Konig L, et al. Modified implantation height of the Sapien3 transcatheter heart valve. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(2):70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar