References
- Ahn JM, Oh JS, Yoon SM, et al. Procedure-related complications during endovascular treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2017;19(3):162–170.
- Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with guglielmi detachable coils: a Meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1706–1709.
- Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a Meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41(1):116–121.
- Park YK, Yi HJ, Choi KS, et al. Intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm: Clinical results and literature review. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e605–e615.
- Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. JNS. 2008;108(6):1088–1092.
- Ren H, Wei M, Yin L, et al. Endovascular coiling of small intracranial aneurysms using a very soft bare platinum coil: a comparison of the packing performance of new and old HyperSoft® helical coils. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22(1):26–33.
- Abbas MA, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, et al. Splenic artery aneurysms: two decades experience at Mayo clinic. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16(4):442–449.
- Berceli SA. Hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18(4):196–201.
- Eskandari MK, Resnick SA. Aneurysms of the renal artery. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18(4):202–208.
- Ito M, Matsubara N, Izumi T, et al. Experimental study of the characteristics of various types of filling coils for intracranial aneurysm embolisation. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(5):513–519.
- White JB, Ken CG, Cloft HJ, et al. Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(7):1242–1246.
- Zhao R, Liu J, McComas S, et al. In-vitro pliability assessment of embolization coils for intracranial aneurysm treatment. J Neurol Sci. 2019;406:116432. 15
- Fujimura S, Takao H, Suzuki T, et al. Hemodynamics and coil distribution with changing coil stiffness and length in intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(8):797–801.
- Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, et al. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology. 2004;231(3):653–658.
- Chalouhi N, Dumont AS, Hasan D, et al. Is packing density important in stent-assisted coiling? Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):381–387.
- Tamatani S, Ito Y, Abe H, et al. Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:762–767.
- Yagi K, Satoh K, Satomi J, et al. Evaluation of aneurysm stability after endovascular embolization with guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between long-term stability and volume embolization ratio. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo)). 2005;45(11):561–566.
- Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H, et al. Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: correlation between packing density and incidence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(12):1798–1807.
- Zhang Y, Xing X, Shen X, et al. The volume embolization ratio of intraaneurysmal embolization using guglielmi detachable coils. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(6):866–872.
- Vallée J-N, Pierot L, Mont’Alverne F, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by three-dimensional coil embolization: evaluation of the postoperative aneurysm occlusion volume. Neuroradiology. 2005;47(6):438–445.
- Usami Y, Hirokawa N, Sakata KI, et al. Histopathological differences of experimental aneurysms treated with bare platinum, fibered, and bioactive coils. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(3):172–177.