The impact of Covid-19 on simulation-based learning of gynecology and obstetrics skills

References

• Peters M, Ten Cate O. Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(2):76–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the “see one, do one, teach one” concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1194–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss TG, Rentea RM. Simulation training and skill assessment in obstetrics and gynecology. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560508
   Google Scholar
• Deering S, Auguste T, Lockrow E. Obstetric simulation for medical student, resident, and fellow education. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(3):143–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett EN, Forstein DA, Bliss S, et al. To the point: the expanding role of simulation in obstetrics and gynecology medical student education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(2):129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paver-Eržen V, Vlahović D, Goričan T, et al. Role of simulation learning in safe patient treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Emonica. 2019;2:98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Boza C, León F, Buckel E, et al. Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie A, Thomas B, Hunter A. Out of hours access to low-fidelity part-task surgical simulators: the trainee perspective. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Simulation in Europe (SESAM); Jun 12–14; Glasgow, Scotland. 2019. p. 178.
   Google Scholar
• Aabakke AJ, Kristufkova A, Bune LT, et al. European trainees support the new European curriculum in obstetrics and gynaecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:335–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele F, Goverde AJ, van der Aa JE, editors. Project for Achieving Consensus in Training (EBCOG-PACT), postgraduate training curriculum for obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.uems.eu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/64399/UEMS-2018.18-European-Training-Requirements-OBGYN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campo R, Wattiez A, Tanos V, et al. Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:133–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komadina R, Crnjac A, Sojar V, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the organisation of surgical activity. ZdravVestn. 2020;89(11–12):650–657.
   Google Scholar
• The number of examinations and surgeries which were cancelled in the first wave of coronavirus. [cited 12 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.vecer.com/slovenija/toliko-nenujnih-pregledov-in-operacij-je-odpadlo-v-prvem-valu-koronavirusa-10229344
   Google Scholar
• The Instructions for trainees of gynecology and obstetrics.Version 4 June 2017. [cited 9 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.zdravniskazbornica.si/docs/default-source/specialiacije/testna-mapa/ginekologija-in-porodnistvo/navodila-specializantom-ginekologije-in-porodništva-julij-2017.pdf?sfvrsn=d9782e36
   Google Scholar
• Lukanović D, Jakopič Maček K, Paver Eržen V, et al. The significance and role of simulation-based learning in ob-gyn trainees. In: Lukanović A, Takač I, editors. A state-of-the-art 2020 review on obstetrics and gynecology in the pre-covid-19 era. Maribor: Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 2021. p. 706–711. Ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Kovac L, Steblovnik L. Is simulation training needed? Slovenian trainees’ perception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;234:e158.
   Google Scholar
• Palmieri L, Palmer K, Lo Noce C, et al. Italian National Institute of Health COVID-19 mortality group (*). Differences in the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who died in hospital during different phases of the pandemic: national data from Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;21:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Perico L, Tomasoni S, Peracchi T, et al. COVID-19 and lombardy: TESTing the impact of the first wave of the pandemic. EBioMedicine. 2020;61:103069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsalinos K, Poulas K, Kouretas D, et al. Improved strategies to counter the COVID-19 pandemic: lockdowns vs. primary and community healthcare. Toxicol Rep. 2021;8:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Mascio D, Sen C, Saccone G, et al. Risk factors associated with adverse fetal outcomes in pregnancies affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a secondary analysis of the WAPM study on COVID-19. J Perinat Med. 2020;48(9):950–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAPM (World Association of Perinatal Medicine) working group on COVID-19. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-COV-2 infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Bosco M, Barbieri B, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the obstetric population before the hospital admission. Minerva Ginecol. 2020;72(6):429–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Del Piccolo L, Bosco M, et al. COVID-19 and mental health in the obstetric population: a lesson from a case of puerperal psychosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2020;72(5):355–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carugno J, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Alonso L, et al. COVID-19 pandemic. Impact on hysteroscopic procedures: a consensus statement from the global congress of hysteroscopy scientific committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):988–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). COVID-19 obstetric preparedness manual. 2020. [cited 2020 Dec 9]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/-/media/project/acog/acogorg/files/pdfs/education/covid-19-obstetric-preparedness-manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks BA, Thomson B, Marko E, et al. Obstetric simulation for a pandemic. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(6):151294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman E, Martins NN, Mahmood T, et al. EBCOG position statement – simulation-based training for obstetrics and gynaecology during the COVID-19 pandemic . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:457–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey K. The best ways to reopen a simulation center during COVID-19. Healthy simulation 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18]. Available from: https://www.healthysimulation.com/27380/reopening-simulation-center-covid-19/
   Google Scholar
• Kiely JD, Posner GD, Sansregret A. Health care team training and simulation-based education in obstetrics during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(8):1017–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerrum F, Thomsen ASS, Nayahangan LJ, et al. Surgical simulation: current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training. Med Teach. 2018;40(7):668–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoopes S, Pham T, Lindo FM, et al. Home surgical skill training resources for obstetrics and gynecology trainees during a pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(1):56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikša M, Brlan A, Paver Eržen V, et al. Laparoscopy simulation training among undergraduate students. Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of Society for Simulation in Europe (SESAM). 2019. June 12–14; Glasgow, Scotland. p. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori E, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, et al. Italian society of gynecology and obstetrics (SIGO). learning climate and quality of Italian training courses in gynecology and obstetrics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;241:13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar