Robotic-assisted versus manual Uro Dyna-CT-guided puncture in an ex-vivo kidney phantom

References

• Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):660–673. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Martignoni G, et al. Percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Histopathology. 2014;65(3):295–308. doi: 10.1111/his.12495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel HD, Gupta M, Joice GA, et al. Clinical stage migration and survival for renal cell carcinoma in the United States. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(4):343–348. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter M, Rassweiler M-C, Michel MS. The uro Dyna-CT enables three-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):880–884. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Rassweiler M-C, Müller M, et al. Surgical navigation in urology: european perspective. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(1):81–97. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajiha M, Baldwin DD. New technologies to aid in percutaneous access. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):225–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2019.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler-Seyfried M-C, Lima E, Ritter M, et al. Navigated percutaneous access to the kidney. Urologe A. 2020;59(9):1017–1025. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01250-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeMaitre L, Mestdagh P, Marecaux-Delomez J, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: placement under laser guidance and real-time CT fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(6):892–895. doi: 10.1007/s003300051030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao D, Zhang Z, Sun Z, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: c -arm CT with 3D virtual navigation in non-dilated renal collecting systems. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018;24(1):17–22. doi: 10.5152/dir.2017.17079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter M, Rassweiler M-C, Häcker A, et al. Laser-guided percutaneous kidney access with the uro Dyna-CT: first experience of three-dimensional puncture planning with an ex vivo model. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1147–1151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0847-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel MS, Ritter M, Schönberg S, et al. The urological Dyna-CT: urological sectional imaging on a newly developed urological intervention table. Urologe A. 2012;51(6):857–861. doi: 10.1007/s00120-012-2837-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su L-M, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW, et al. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol. 2002;16(7):471–475. doi: 10.1089/089277902760367421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo MM, Gandhi HR, Chong KT, et al. Automated needle targeting with X-ray (ANT-X) - robot-assisted device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with its first successful use in human. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):e919. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi K, Hamamoto S, Okada A, et al. Robot-assisted fluoroscopy versus ultrasound-guided renal access for nephrolithotomy: a phantom model benchtop study. J Endourol. 2019;33(12):987–994. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiu B, De Baère T, Noel G, et al. Feasibility, safety and accuracy of a CT-guided robotic assistance for percutaneous needle placement in a swine liver model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84878-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeil A, Cazzato RL, Barbé L, et al. Robotically assisted CBCT-guided needle insertions: preliminary results in a phantom model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(2):283–288. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2088-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komaki T, Hiraki T, Kamegawa T, et al. Robotic CT-guided out-of-plane needle insertion: comparison of angle accuracy with manual insertion in phantom and measurement of distance accuracy in animals. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1342–1349. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06477-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei L, Jiang S, Yang Z, et al. A CT-guided robotic needle puncture method for lung tumours with respiratory motion. Phys Med. 2020;73:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu JH, Wang J, Liu XJ, et al. Accuracy analysis of robotic assistant needle placement for lateral skull base biopsy. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi Chin J Stomatol. 2018;53:519–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kostrzewa M, Rothfuss A, Pätz T, et al. Robotic assistance system for Cone-Beam computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;45(1):62–68. 10.1007/s00270-021-02938-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH, et al. Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):2009–2022. doi: 10.1148/rg.287085004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar