Identifying expressions of pleasure and displeasure by persons with profound and multiple disabilities

References

• Arthur M. Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2004; 16: 125–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M., Butterfield N., Sigafoos J. Promoting communication: Strategies to promote increased opportunities for communicative interactions. Partners in everyday communicative exchanges: A guide to promoting interaction involving people with severe intellectual disability, Arthur M, Butterfield N, Sigafoos J. MacLennan & Petty, Sydney 1995; 46–71, In
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg K., West D., Iacono T. A. Picture it: An evaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 2003; 28: 260–282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley V. J., Taylor M., Mulkern V., Leff J. Quality issues and personnel: In search of competent community support workers. Quality of life. Vol. II: Applications to persons with disabilities, Schalock R. L. American Association on Mental Retardation, , Washington 1997; 149–164, In
   Google Scholar
• Cummins R. A. Self‐rated quality of life scales for people with an intellectual disability: A review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability 1997; 10: 199–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daelman M. Een analyse van de presymbolische communicatie bij blinde kinderen met een meervoudige handicap (doctoraatsproefschrift) [An analysis of the presymbolic communication of blind children with multiple disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation)]. K. U. Leuven, Centrum voor Orthopedagogiek, Leuven 2003
   Google Scholar
• Diener E. Subjective well‐being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist 2000; 55: 34–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson S., Upadhyaya S., Stanley B. Using an interdisciplinary approach to training to develop the quality of communication with adults with profound learning disabilities by care staff. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2002; 37: 41–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D., Jones E., Lowe K. Active support: Planning daily activities and support for people with severe mental retardation. Person‐centered planning. Research, practice and future directions, Holburn S, Vietze P. M. P. H. Brookes, Baltimore 2002; 247–269, In
   Google Scholar
• Green C. W., Reid D. H. Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1996; 29: 67–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove N., Bunning K., Porter J., Olsson C. See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1999; 12: 190–203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess D., Roberts S., Rues J. Longitudinal analysis of state patterns and related variables among infants and children with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002; 27: 112–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagopian L. P., Long E. S., Rush K. S. Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification 2004; 28: 668–677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton C. Choice. The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities, Emerson E, Hatton C, Thompson T, Parmenter T. R. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2004; 335–351, In
   Google Scholar
• Heal L. W., Sigelman C. K. Methodological issues in quality of life measurement. Quality of life. Vol. I: Conceptualization and measurement, Schalock R. L. American Association on Mental Retardation, , Washington 1996; 91–104, In
   Google Scholar
• Hogg J., Reeves D., Roberts J., Mudford O. C. Consistency, context and confidence in judgements of affective communication in adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2001; 45: 18–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G. E., O'Reilly M. F., Emerson E. A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1996; 17: 391–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan K. R., Gast D. L. Conducting preference assessments and reinforcer testing for individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Issues and procedures. Exceptionality 2001; 9: 123–134
   Google Scholar
• Lyons G. Life satisfaction for children with profound and multiple disabilities: Seeking eudemonia. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle, Faculty of Education and Arts, Newcastle 2003
   Google Scholar
• McVilly K. R., Burton Smith R. M., Davidson J. A. Concurrence between subject and proxy ratings of quality of life for people with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 2000; 25: 19–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafstad A., Rødbroe I. Co‐creating communication. Perspectives on diagnostic education for individuals who are congenitally deafblind and individuals whose impairments may have similar effects. Forlaget Nord‐Press, Dronninglund 1999
   Google Scholar
• Nind M., Hewett D. A practical guide to intensive interaction. British Institute of Learning Disabilities, Kidderminster 2001
   Google Scholar
• Oliver C. The neglect of psychological disorder in people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2004; 48: 360
   Google Scholar
• Perry J., Felce D. Subjective and objective quality of life assessment: Responsiveness, response bias, and resident: proxy concordance. Mental Retardation 2002; 40: 445–456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid D. H., Green C. W. Person‐centered planning with people who have severe multiple disabilities: Validated practices and misapplications. Person‐centered planning. Research, practice and future directions, Holburn S, Vietze P. M. P. H. Brookes, Baltimore 2002; 183–202, In
   Google Scholar
• Rødbroe I., Souriau J. Communication. A guide to planning and support for individuals who are deafblind, McInnes J. University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1999; 119–149, In
   Google Scholar
• Roemer M. H. P., Van Dam L. Verstaanbaar maken. Communicatie met mensen met een zeer ernstige verstandelijke (meervoudige) handicap: Inventarisatie en overdracht van ervaringskennis (Proefschrift) [Making oneself understood. Communication with people with profound intellectual (multiple) disabilities: Inventory and transfer of practical knowledge (Doctoral dissertation).]. University of Maastricht, Faculty of Social Sciences, Maastricht 2004
   Google Scholar
• Schalock R. L. Quality of Life. Vol. I: Conceptualization and measurement. American Association on Mental Retardation, , Washington 1996
   Google Scholar
• Schalock R. L., Bonham G. S., Marchand C. B. Consumer based quality of life assessment: A path model of perceived satisfaction. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 75–85
   Google Scholar
• Schalock R. L., Brown I., Brown R., Cummins R. A., Felce D., Matikka L., Keith K. D., Parmenter T. R. Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation 2002; 40: 457–470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schalock R. L., Felce D. Quality of life and subjective well‐being: Conceptual and measurement issues. The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities, Emerson E, Hatton C, Thompson T, Parmenter T. R. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 2004; 261–279, In
   Google Scholar
• Stancliffe R. J. Proxy respondents and quality of life. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 89–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Maat S. Communicatie tussen personen met een diep mentale handicap en hun opvoed(st)ers [Communication between persons with a profound intellectual disability and their primary caregivers]. Garant, Leuven 1992
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp C., Zijlstra R. Leisure time or killing time? An analysis of leisure provision for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (Congress Abstract). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2004; 48: 358
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield P., Ogletree B. Training team members to respond to the communicative behaviors of children with profound handicaps. Focus on Autistic Behavior 1995; 10: 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Warren S., Yoder P., Gazdag G., Kyoungran K., Jones H. Facilitating prelinguistic communication skills in young children with developmental delay. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 83–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zijlstra R. Dansen met olifanten. Een onderzoek naar de implementatie van het opvoedingsprogramma in de zorg voor mensen met ernstige meervoudige beperkingen. [Dancing with elephants. A study of the implementation of an educational program in the care for persons with profound multiple disabilities.]. Stichting Kinderstudies, Groningen 2003
   Google Scholar
• Zijlstra H. P., Vlaskamp C. The impact of medical health conditions of children with profound and multiple disabilities (PMD) on professional support in day care centres (Congress Abstract). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2004; 48: 356
   Google Scholar
• Zijlstra R. H. P., Vlaskamp C., Buntinx W. H. E. Direct care staff turnover: An indicator of the quality of life of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. European Journal on Mental Disability 2001; 22: 38–55
   Google Scholar