The impact of partner training on the communicative involvement of students with multiple and severe disability in special schools

References

• Arthur M. Behavior states and a half‐full glass: A response to Mudford, Hogg and Roberts. American Journal on Mental Retardation 2000; 105: 509–511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arthur M. Socio‐communicative variables and behavior states in students with profound and multiple disabilities: Descriptive data from school settings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2003; 38: 200–219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Patterns amongst behavior states, socio‐communicative and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2004; 16: 125–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M., Butterfield N., MacKinnon D. Communication intervention for students with severe disability: Results of a partner training program. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 1998; 45: 97–115
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M., Foreman P., Pascoe S., Butterfield N., Bennett D. Educational programming for students with high support needs: A report of work in progress. Australasian Journal of Special Education 1999; 23((1))64–74
   Google Scholar
• Ault M. M., Guy B., Guess D., Bashinski S., Roberts S. Analyzing behaviour state and learning environments: Application in instructional settings. Mental Retardation 1995; 33: 304–316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brazelton T. Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (2nd ed.). Spastics International Medical Publications, London 1984
   Google Scholar
• Brown F., Gothelf C. R., Guess D., Lehr D. H. Self‐determination for individuals with the most severe disabilities: Moving beyond chimera. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1998; 23: 17–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield N., Arthur M., Linfoot K., Philips S. Creating communicative contexts: An instructional manual for teachers of students with severe intellectual disability. NSW Department of School Education, Sydney 1992
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N., Arthur M., Sigafoos J. Partners in everyday communicative exchanges: A guide to promoting interaction involving people with severe intellectual disability. MacLennan & Petty/Paul H. Brookes, Sydney/Baltimore 1995
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P., Arthur‐Kelly M., Pascoe S., Smyth King B. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2004; 29((3))183–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman P., Bourke S., Mishra G., Frost R. Assessing the support needs of children with a disability in regular classes. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 2001; 48: 239–252
   Google Scholar
• Guess D., Roberts S., Rues J. Longitudinal analysis of state patterns and related variables among infants and children with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002; 27((2))112–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess D., Roberts S., Siegel‐Causey E., Rues J. Replication and extended analysis of behavior state, environmental events, and related variables among individuals with profound disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1995; 100((1))36–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hastings R. P., Daley D., Burns C., Beck A. Maternal distress and expressed emotion: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal relationships with behavior problems of children with intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation 2006; 111: 48–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houghton J., Bronicki G. J. B., Guess D. Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1987; 12((1))18–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarson L., Meiers M., Beavis A. Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives 2005; 13: 1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen D., Sigafoos J., Woodyatt G. Teacher responses to the communicative attempts of children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2005; 17: 19–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent‐Walsh J., McNaughton D. Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2005; 21: 195–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M. D., Chen D., Haney M. Promoting learning through active interaction: A guide to early communication with young children who have multiple disabilities. Paul. H. Brookes, Baltimore 2000
   Google Scholar
• McCathren R. B. Teacher‐implemented prelinguistic communication intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 2000; 15((1))21–29
   Google Scholar
• Mellstrom B. P., Saunders M. D., Saunders R. R., Olswang L. B. Interaction of behavioral state and microswitch use in individuals with profound multiple impairments. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2005; 17((1))35–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noone S. J., Jones R. S. P., Hastings R. P. Care staff attributions about challenging behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2006; 27: 30–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell E. Conceptualising and facilitating active learning: Teachers' video‐stimulated reflective dialogues. Reflective Practice 2005; 6: 407–418
   Google Scholar
• Reichle J., Halle J., Johnston S. Developing an initial communicative repertoire. Communication and language intervention series, Volume 2. Enhancing children's communication: Research foundations for intervention, Warren S. F, Reichle J, Kaiser A. P, Gray D. B. Paul. H. Brookes, Baltimore 1993; 105–136, (Series Eds.), (Volume Eds.)
   Google Scholar
• Roberts S., Arthur‐Kelly M., Foreman P., Pascoe S. Educational approaches for maximising arousal in children with multiple and severe disability: New directions for research and practice in early childhood contexts. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2005; 8((2))88–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence‐based practice. Academic Press, San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Siegel‐Causey E., Bashinski S. Enhancing initial communication and responsiveness of learners with multiple disabilities: A tri‐focus framework for partners. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities 1997; 12((2))105–120
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J., Arthur‐Kelly M., Butterfield N. Enhancing everyday communication for children with disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 2006
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J., Woodyatt G., Keen D., Tait K., Tucker M., Roberts‐Pennell D., Pittendreigh N. Identifying potential communicative acts in children with developmental and physical disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly 2000; 21((2))77–86
   Google Scholar
• Smidt A., Balandin S., Sigafoos J., Reed V. A communication training programme for residential staff working with adults with challenging behaviour: Pilot data on intervention effects. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2007; 20: 16–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang S. Y. F., Choi P. L. Connecting theory and practice in mentor preparation: Mentoring for the improvement of teaching and learning. Mentoring and Tutoring 2005; 13: 383–401
   Google Scholar
• Ware J. Creating a responsive environment for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (2nd ed.). David Fulton, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Wilder J., Granlund M. Behaviour style and interaction between seven children with multiple disabilities and their caregivers. Child: Care, Health and Development 2003; 29((6))559–567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodyatt G., Marinac J., Darnell R., Sigafoos J., Halle J. Behaviour state analysis in Rett Syndrome: Continuous data reliability measurement. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 2004; 51((4))383–400
   Google Scholar