Grounded theory as a method for research in speech and language therapy

References

• Annells M. Grounded theory method: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qualitative Health Research 1996; 6: 379–393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annells M. Grounded theory method, part I: Within the five moments of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry 1997a; 4: 120–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Annells M. Grounded theory method, part II: Options for users of the method. Nursing Inquiry 1997b; 4: 176–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barry S. Qualitative research: more than teaching an old dog new tricks?. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing 2002; 4: 32–33
   Google Scholar
• Becker P. Common pitfalls of published grounded theory research. Qualitative Health Research 1993; 3: 254–260
   Google Scholar
• Brinton B., Fujiki M. Blending quantitative and qualitative methods in language research and intervention. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 165–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce C., Parker A., Renfrew L. ‘Helping or something’: perceptions of students with aphasia and tutors in further education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2006; 41: 137–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K Denzin, Y. S Lincoln. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 509–535
   Google Scholar
• Coyne I. T. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 26: 623–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe J. R. Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000; 31: 1476–1484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico J. S., Simmons‐Mackie N. N. Qualitative research and speech–language pathology: a tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 131–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David R., Whitehouse J. Modelling the consultation process in a secondary referral unit for children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1998; 33: 532–537
   Google Scholar
• Davidson B., McAllister L. An introduction to qualitative research approaches. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing 2002; 4: 28–31
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood J. Qualitative research: an additional research methodology for speech pathology?. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1988; 23: 171–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezzy. Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW 2002
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G. Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G. Conceptualisation: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2002, Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 4. Available at: http://www.qualitative‐research.net/fqs‐texte/2‐04/2‐04glaser‐e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Holton J. Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2004; 5
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York, NY 1967
   Google Scholar
• Hall W. A., Callery P. Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating the reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research 2001; 11: 257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhow R., Stewart T. Introduction to qualitative research and its application to stuttering. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2006; 41: 475–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath H., Cowley S. Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2004; 41: 141–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson S. The phenomenon of patient participation in their nursing care — a grounded theory study. 1998, Unpublished PhD, Curtin University of Technology, Adelaide
   Google Scholar
• Hersh D. ‘Weaning’ clients from aphasia therapy: speech pathologists' strategies for discharge. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 1007–1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler J. Choosing a research question: matching questions with methodologies. Writing Qualitative Research, J Higgs. Hampden, Five Docks, NSW 1998; 69–80
   Google Scholar
• Markham C., Dean T. Parents' and professionals' perceptions of quality of life in children with speech and language difficulty. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2006; 41: 189–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann T. V., Clark E. Grounded theory in nursing research — Part 1: Methodology. Nurse Researcher 2003a; 11: 7–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCann T. V., Clark E. Grounded theory in nursing research — Part 2: Critique. Nurse Researcher 2003b; 11: 19–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melia K. M. Rediscovering Glaser. Qualitative Health Research 1996; 6: 368–378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellion L. R., Tovin M. M. Grounded theory: a qualitative research methodology for physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2002; 18: 109–120
   Google Scholar
• Nettleton J., Reilly O. Facilitating effective learning during clinical placement. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1998; 33: 250–254
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell B. Enabling care: working through obscurity and uncertainty. A basic social process used in selected acute care settings. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000; 17: 32–39
   Google Scholar
• Pilling S., Slattery J. Management competencies: intrinsic or acquired? What competencies are required to move into speech pathology management and beyond?. Australian Health Review 2004; 27: 84–92
   Google Scholar
• Rice P. L., Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, VIC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Simmons‐Mackie N. N., Damico J. S. Contributions of qualitative research to the knowledge base of normal communication. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley M., Cheek J. Grounded theory: exploiting the potential for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003; 66: 143–150
   Google Scholar
• Stern P. N. Eroding grounded theory. Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, J Morse. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994; 212–223
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1990
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Tetnowski J. A., Franklin T. C. Qualitative research: implications for description and assessment. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 155–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trulsson U., Klingberg G. Living with a child with a severe orofacial handicap: experience from the perspectives of parents. European Journal of Oral Science 2003; 111: 19–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukrainetz T. A., Frequez E. F. ‘What isn't language?’: a qualitative study of the role of the school speech–language pathologist. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2003; 34: 284–298
   Google Scholar
• Wilson H. S., Hutchinson S. A. Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research 1996; 45: 122–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar