The effect of major adverse renal cardiovascular event (MARCE) incidence, procedure volume, and unit cost on the hospital savings resulting from contrast media use in inpatient angioplasty

References

• Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Shaw AD, Faselis C, Palant CE, Kimmel PL. Association between AKI and Long-Term Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in United States Veterans. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN 2014;9:448-456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier-Jean A, Beaubien-Souligny W, Goupil R, et al. Diagnosis and outcomes of acute kidney injury using surrogate and imputation methods for missing preadmission creatinine values. BMC Nephrol 2017;18:141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heung M, Steffick DE, Zivin K, et al. Acute kidney injury recovery pattern and subsequent risk of CKD: an analysis of veterans health administration data. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;67:742-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishani A, Nelson D, Clothier B, et al. The magnitude of acute serum creatinine increase after cardiac surgery and the risk of chronic kidney disease, progression of kidney disease, and death. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:226-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parr SK, Siew ED. Delayed consequences of acute kidney injury. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2016;23:186-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu V-C, Wu C-H, Huang T-M, et al. Long-term risk of coronary events after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;25:595-605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed NM, Mahfouz A, Achkar K, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Heart Views Offic J Gulf Heart Assoc 2013;14:106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldfarb S, McCullough PA, McDermott J, Gay SB. Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Specialty-Specific Protocols for Interventional Radiology, Diagnostic Computed Tomography Radiology, and Interventional Cardiology. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2009;84:170-179
   Google Scholar
• Bucher AM, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. Is Contrast Medium Osmolality a Causal Factor for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy? BioMed Research International 2014;2014:1-6. doi:10.1155/2014/931413
   Google Scholar
• McCullough PA, Brown JR. Effects of intra-arterial and intravenous iso-osmolar contrast medium (iodixanol) on the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Cardiorenal Med 2011;1:220-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson S-G, et al. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 2003;348:491-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson S-G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of iodixanol in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am Heart J 2005;149:298-303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng J, Wilson RF, Subramaniam RM, et al. Comparative effect of contrast media type on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparative effect of contrast media type. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:417-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich MC, Ha¨berle L, Mu¨ller V, et al. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology 2009;250:68-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo S-H, Youn T-J, Koo B-K, et al. Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:924-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed M, Meier P, Tamhane UU, et al. The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC: Cardiovasc Intervent 2009;2:645-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin D-H, Choi D-J, Youn T-J, et al. Comparison of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity of iodixanol and iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:189-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2015
   Google Scholar
• Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, et al. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. Oxford: OUP; 2014
   Google Scholar
• McCullough PA, David G, Todoran TM, et al. Iso-osmolar contrast media and adverse renal and cardiac events after percutaneous cardiovascular intervention. J Comparat Effectiv Res 2017 In Press (available electronically, not yet in print-doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0052. [Epub ahead of print])
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Francesco M, Ronco C, Wacinski PJ, et al. Economic impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury associated with invasive cardiology: role of iso-osmolar contrast media in Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain. J Med Econ 2016;19:168-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPI of US medical care services. Bureau of Labor Statistics (US Government). US Census. 2017; https://www.bls.gov
   Google Scholar
• Premier Healthcare Database: data the informs and performs. Charlotte, NC: Premier Healthcare Database: Date that Informs and Preforms: 2017
   Google Scholar
• Ernst FR, Chen E, Lipkin C, et al. Comparison of hospital length of stay, costs, and readmissions of alteplase versus catheter replacement among patients with occluded central venous catheters. J Hosp Med 2014;9:490-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AHA. Fast Facts on US Hospitals 2017. Chicago, IL: AHA; 2017
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics.Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. p.288. Hyattsville, MD. 2016
   Google Scholar
• Census U. Census regions and divisions of the United States 2015; 2015 US Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Services) Washington DC https://www.bls.gov/lau/laurdqa.htm#Q1
   Google Scholar
• Gapenski LC. Healthcare finance. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Col Cardiol 2004;44:1393-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, et al. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:3365-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Thottakkara P, et al. Mortality and cost of acute and chronic kidney disease after vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2016;30:72-81. e72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:172-209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease in Dialysis Patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005;45:S1-S154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin AP, Bach RG, Caruso ML, et al. Association of variation in contrast volume with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1007-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AHRQ. 2010-2013 Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). Overview of the national inpatient sample. Rockville, MD: AHRQ
   Google Scholar
• Stuntz M, Palac A. Recent trends in inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention volume in the United States: analysis of HCUP-NIS, 2010–2013. Paper presented at the International Society of Pharmcoeconomic and Outcomes Research (ISPOR); 2016 19th Annual European Congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 29 October-02 November 2016 Vienna, Austria
   Google Scholar
• Bortnick AE, Epps KC, Selzer F, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients treated for coronary artery disease in the face of an increasing burden of co-morbidity and disease complexity (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry). Am J Cardiol 2014;113:573-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar