Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: a public payer perspective

References

• Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C, et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:395-401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, et al. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol 2016;69:324-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2000;163:768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Clark KA, et al. Systematic review of risk factors for urinary tract infection in adults with spinal cord dysfunction. J Spinal Cord Med 1999;22:258-72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krebs J, Wollner J, Pannek J. Risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract infections in individuals with chronic neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2016;54:682-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turi MH, Hanif S, Fasih Q, et al. Proportion of complications in patients practicing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) vs indwelling catheter. JPMA J Pakistan Med Assoc 2006;56:401-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodbury MG, Hayes KC, Askes HK. Intermittent catheterization practices following spinal cord injury: a national survey. Can J Urol 2008;15:4065-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Urological Association. Clean intermittent self-catheterization for women. Quebec: Canadian Urological Association; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Christison K, Walter M, Wyndaele JJM, et al. Intermittent Catheterization: The Devil Is in the Details. Journal of Neurotrauma 2018. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domurath B, Kutzenberger J, Kurze I, et al. Spinal Cord 2011;49:817–21
   Google Scholar
• Vahr S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, et al. Catheterisation urethral intermittent in adults. Milan: European Association of Urology Nurses; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson MA. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status. Spinal Cord 2014;52:511-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen PN, et al. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. Eur Urol 2005;48:978-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas DD, Moore KN, Dannels-McClure A, et al. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PMR 2011;3:408-17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarica S, Akkoc Y, Karapolat H, et al. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2010;46:473-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamout S, Biardeau X, Corcos J, et al. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2017;55:629-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses (Report). BMC Urol 2017;17:1-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Greis G, Johansson B, et al. Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Scand J Urol. 2013;47:33-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnek J, Maynard F, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 2003;169:994-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denys P, Previnaire JG, Aegerter P, et al. Intermittent self-catheterization habits and opinion on aseptic VaPro catheter in French neurogenic bladder population. Spinal Cord 2012;50:853-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ridder DJMK, Everaert K, Fernández LG, et al. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial (Report). Eur Urol 2005;48:991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. BJU Int 1999;83:767-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartier-Kastler E, Lauge I, Ruffion A, et al. Safety of a new compact catheter for men with neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a randomised, crossover and open-labelled study. Spinal Cord 2011;49:844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testai E, Hartemann P, Rastogi SC, et al. The safety of medical devices containing DEHP plasticized PVC or other plasticizers on neonates and other groups possibly at risk (2015 update). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol RTP 2016;76:209-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witjes JA, Del Popolo G, Marberger M, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials. J Urol 2009;182:2794-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truzzi JC, Teich V, Pepe C. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries. Int Braz J Urol 2018;44:121-131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Advisory Secretariat. Hydrophilic catheters - an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2006;6:1-31
   Google Scholar
• Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, et al. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2013;346:1-16
   Google Scholar
• Clark JF, Mealing SJ, Scott DA, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and uncoated catheters. Spinal Cord 2016;54:73-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakansson MA, Neovius K, Lundqvist T. Healthcare costs associated with hydrophilic-coated and non-coated urinary catheters for intermittent use in the United States (Research). Urol Nurs 2016;36:233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses. BMJ Open 2017;7:1-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Yamamoto S, Gotoh M, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-Term Intermittent Self-Catheterization with Hydrophilic-Coated and Uncoated Catheters in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury in Japan. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2017;9:142-150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry: Special Report 2011–2013. http://sci2.rickhanseninstitute.org/images/Images/sci2/Home/RHSCIRspecialreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Agraharkar M, Nair V, Patlovany M. Recovery of renal function in dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol 2003;4:9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welk B, Liu K, Winick‐Ng J, et al. Urinary tract infections, urologic surgery, and renal dysfunction in a contemporary cohort of traumatic spinal cord injured patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:640-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, et al. WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;8:Cd006008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li L, Ye W, Ruan H, et al. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Report). Arch Phys Med Rehab 2013;94:782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, et al. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Data Syst Rev 2014:Cd006008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2018). Table 053-0003. Elements of the life table, Canada, provinces and territories. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=530003&retrLang=eng
   Google Scholar
• Karlowsky JA, Lagace-Wiens PRS, Simner PJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract pathogens in Canada from 2007 to 2009: CANWARD surveillance study. Antimicrobial Agents Chemo 2011;55:3169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba Medical 2017 [cited 2017 June 19th]; Available from: http://www.albamedical.ca/shop/catalogue/index.php?idctg_ctg=187
   Google Scholar
• SCI supply inc. 2017 [cited 2017 June 19th]; Available from: https://www.scisupply.ca/intermittent-catheters
   Google Scholar
• Canmeddirect. 2017 [cited 2017 June 19th]; Available from: https://www.canmeddirect.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Ontario. Schedule of benefits, physician services under the Health Insurance Act 2015, effective Ontario. 2016. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/sob/physserv/sob_master20160401.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIHI. Patient Cost Estimator 2014-2015. 2017 [cited 2017 February 15th]; Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/patient-cost-estimator
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. OCCI. Ontario: Health Data Branch Web Portal; 2015. https://hsim.health.gov.on.ca/hdbportal/
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M., Sculpher M., Torrance G., O'Brian B., Stoddart G. Methods for economic evaluation of health care programs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015;4
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Labour force. 2008 [cited 2017 July 25th]; Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/def/4153361-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• CADTH. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Ottawa, Canada; 4th Edition. 2017. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines_for_the_economic_evaluation_of_health_technologies_canada_4th_ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liu CW, Attar KH, Gall A, et al. The relationship between bladder management and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury in the UK. Spinal Cord 2009;48:319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ara R, Brazier J. Deriving an algorithm to convert the eight mean SF‐36 dimension scores into a mean EQ‐5D preference‐based score from published studies (where patient level data are not available). Value Health 2008;11:1131-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Igawa Y, Krassioukov A, Averbeck MA, et al. Using time trade-off (TTO)surveys to measure health utilities associated with different urinary catheter innovations. Poster accepted for presentation at: ISPOR 23rd Annual International Meeting; May 23, 2018; Baltimore
   Google Scholar
• Igawa Y, Krassioukov A, Averbeck MA, et al. Using time trade-off (TTO)surveys to measure health utilities associated with different urinary catheter innovations. Poster accepted for presentation at: ISPOR 23rd Annual International Meeting; May 23, 2018; Baltimore
   Google Scholar
• Montgomerie JZ. Low mortality among patients with spinal cord injury and bacteremia. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13:867-71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson G, Drummond M. Alternative approaches for assessing the socioeconomic benefits of medical devices: a systematic review. Expert Rev Med Devices 2015;12:629-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payakachat N, Ali MM, Tilford JM. Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics 2015;33:1137-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesen E, Bjorholt I, Ingelgard A, et al. Exploration and preferential ranking of patient benefits of medical devices: A new and generic instrument for health economic assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017;33:463-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Nafees B, et al. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters. Pat Pref Adher 2015;9:381-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottenden, A.F., Mandy; Beeckman, Dimitri; Bliss, Donna, Buckley, Brian, Kitsen-Reynolds, Ellen; Moore, Katherine et al., Management of Incontinence Using Continence Products, in 6th International Consultation on Incontinence, P.C. Abrams, Linda; Wagg, Adrian; Wein, Alan, Editor. 2017, International Continence Society and International Consultation on Urological Diseases: Tokyo. p. 2303–2426.
   Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 1992;146:473-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, et al. What is the price of life and why doesn’t it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1637-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Richard I, et al. Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia 1995;33:619-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chai T, Chung A, Belville W, et al. Compliance and complications of clean intermittent catheterization in the spinal cord injured patient. Spinal Cord 1995;33:161-3
   Google Scholar
• Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Gaynes RP. The impact of antimicrobial-resistant, health care-associated infections on mortality in the United States (Report). Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Schneider H, Adlof A, et al. Economic burden of illness imposed by severe sepsis in Austria. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2002;114:697-701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vekeman F, Yameogo N-D, Lefebvre P, et al. Healthcare costs associated with nephrology care in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. J Med Econ 2010;13:673-80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1668-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar