The impact of different scenarios for intermittent bladder catheterization on health state utilities: results from an internet-based time trade-off survey

References

• Pannek J, et al. Guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Eur Assoc Urol 2013;2013:64
   Google Scholar
• Edokpolo LU, Stavris KB, Foster HE. Intermittent catheterization and recurrent urinary tract infection in spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18:187-92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson KD, Borisoff JF, Johnson RD, et al. The impact of spinal cord injury on sexual function: concerns of the general population. Spinal Cord 2006;45:328-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, et al. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. J Urol 2010;184:213-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen PN, et al. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. Eur Urol 2005;48:978-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2000;163:768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Forchheimer MB, et al. Medical and psychosocial complications associated with method of bladder management after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:449-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Elwick H, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire. Clin Ther 2012;34:2302-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, et al. Qualiveen: a urinary disorder-specific instrument for use in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1661-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesen E, Bjorholt I, Ingelgard A, et al. Exploration and preferential ranking of patient benefits of medical devices: a new and generic instrument for health economic assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017;33:463-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, et al. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottenden AFM, Beeckman D, Bliss D, et al. Management of incontinence using continence products. In: Abrams L, Wagg A, Wein A, eds. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Tokyo: International Continence Society and International Consultation on Urological Diseases, 2017:2303-426
   Google Scholar
• Methods for Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson G, Drummond M. Alternative approaches for assessing the socioeconomic benefits of medical devices: a systematic review. Expet Rev Med Dev 2015;12:629-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Nafees B, et al. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters. Patient Prefer Adher 2015;9:381-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan VK, Dixon S. Incorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studies. Pharmacoeconomics 2013;31:677-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matza LS, Stewart KD, Davies EW, et al. Health state utilities associated with glucose monitoring devices. Value Health 2017;20:507-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverket (TLV), Handbok till Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverkets föreskrifter (TLVFS 2011:3) om ansökan om pris och subvention för förbrukningsartiklar, downloadet from http://www.tlv.se/Upload/Foretag/Handbok-TLVFS2011-3-subvention-forbrukningsartiklar-sept-2011.pdf on January 15, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC Guidelines), version 5.0. 2016. Downloaded from https://pbac.pbs.gov.au/content/information/files/pbac-guidelines-version-5.pdf. on January 18, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull 2010;96:5-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989;5:559-75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardenas DD, Moore KN, Dannels-McClure A, et al. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PM&R 2011;3:408-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krassioukov A, Cragg JJ, West C, et al. The good, the bad and the ugly of catheterization practices among elite athletes with spinal cord injury: a global perspective. Spinal Cord 2015;53:78-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks S, Morris N, Delgado D, et al. Development of an effective and acceptable cleaning method to allow safe re-use of plain, uncoated catheters for intermittent catheterisation. Tokyo: ICS, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Chaviano A, Matkov T, Anderson C, et al. Mitrofanoff continent catheterizable stoma for pediatric patients with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2000;6(Suppl 1):30-5
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Life Tables for WHO member states. 2014. Available from http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/life_tables/en/ [Accessed 1 October 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Evans M, Khunti K, Mamdani M, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events: a time trade-off survey in five countries. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderstråle M, Evans LM, Jensen HH, et al. Estimating the impact of changes in HbA(1c), body weight and insulin injection regimen on health related quality-of-life: a time trade off study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14:13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Jensen HH, Bøgelund M, et al. Flexible insulin dosing improves health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL): a time trade-off survey. J Med Econ 2013;16:1357-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bermingham SL, Ashe JF. Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-related quality of life. BJU Int 2012;110:E830-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, et al. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2013;346
   Google Scholar
• Renard J, Ballarini S, Mascarenhas T, et al. Recurrent lower urinary tract infections have a detrimental effect on patient quality of life: a prospective, observational study. Infect Dis Ther 2015;4:125-35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, et al. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. Available from www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9 [Accessed 26 June 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Arnold D, Girling A, Stevens A, et al. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis. BMJ 2009;339
   Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. Health Economics 2002;11:447-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye KS, Matza LS, Feeny DH, et al. Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches? Expet Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014;14:437-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto T, Fukui T. Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: review and reference for health care professionals. J Epidemiol 2002;12:160-78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar