Budget impact analysis of demineralized bone matrix in combination with autograft in lumbar spinal fusion procedures for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in Spain

References

• Taher F, Essig D, Lebl DR, et al. Lumbar degenerative disc disease: current and future concepts of diagnosis and management. Adv Orthop 2012;2012:970752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmona L, Ballina J, Gabriel R, et al. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the general population of Spain: results from a national survey. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:1040-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001;344:363-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth W, Todd CJ, King H, et al. Primary care referrals for lumbar spine radiography: diagnostic yield and clinical guidelines. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:475-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull WHO 2003;81:646-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich GE. Low back pain. Bull WHO 2003;81:671-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modic MT, Ross JS. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 2007;245:43-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesas AE, Gonzalez AD, Mesas CE, et al. The association of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and migraine with absenteeism due to health problems in Spanish workers. Spine 2014;39:1243-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs FM, Seco J, Royuela A, et al. Predicting the evolution of low back pain patients in routine clinical practice: results from a registry within the Spanish National Health Service. Spine J 2012;12:1008-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadıstica. Adult Spanish population by July 2017. Access 2018. Available at: http://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=9663
   Google Scholar
• NICE. NICE Guideline [NG59]: Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. NICE; 2016. Accessed 2017. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59
   Google Scholar
• Pennicooke B, Moriguchi Y, Hussain I, et al. Biological Treatment Approaches for Degenerative Disc Disease: A Review of Clinical Trials and Future Directions. Cureus. 2016;8:e892.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 2012;37:67-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schizas C, Kulik G, Kosmopoulos V. Disc degeneration: current surgical options. Eur Cell Mater 2010;20:306-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito Z, Matsuyama Y, Sakai Y, et al. Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2010;35:E1101-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtori S, Suzuki M, Koshi T, et al. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with a local bone graft versus an iliac crest bone graft: a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2011;20:635-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta DK, Truumees E, Patel CK, et al. Outcome of local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine 2006;31:985-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, et al. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury 2011;42(Suppl 2):S3-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly DW Jr, Ackerman SJ, Shaffrey CI, et al. A cost analysis of bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in single-level anterior lumbar fusion. Orthopedics 2003;26:1027-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150:893-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammisa Jr FP, Lowery G, Garfin SR, et al. Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton® DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine 2004;29:660-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM, et al. Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. Orthopedics 2000;23:1059-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, et al. Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery. Spine J 2002;2:206-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlqvist P, Dawson S, Jeppsson K, et al. Demineralised bone matrix (DBM) versus iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for lumbar spinal fusion procedures in the United Kingdom; a budget-impact analysis. Value Health 2013;16:A558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestergaard LG, Christensen FB, Nielsen CV, et al. Early versus late initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2013;38:1979-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu WK, Hashimoto RE, Berven SH, et al. Biological substitutes/extenders for spinal arthrodesis: which agents are cost-effective? Spine 2014;39(22 Suppl 1):S86-S98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrison KR, Donell S, Ryder J, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in the non-healing of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(30):1-150, iii-iv.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadıstica. Inflation rates. Accesed 2017. Available at: http://www.ine.es/calcula/
   Google Scholar
• Kang J, An H, Hilibrand A, et al. Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions. Spine 2012;37:1083-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong S, Park JH, Roh SW. A prospective comparative study of radiological outcomes after instrumented posterolateral fusion mass using autologous local bone or a mixture of beta-tcp and autologous local bone in the same patient. Acta Neurochir 2013;155:765-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunakornsawat S, Kirinpanu A, Piyaskulkaew C, et al. A comparative study of radiographic results using HEALOS collagen-hydroxyapatite sponge with bone marrow aspiration versus local bone graft in the same patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Med Assoc Thai 2013;96:929-35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowery GL, Kulkarni S, Pennisi AE. Use of autologous growth factors in lumbar spinal fusion. Bone 1999;25:47S-50S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Choi CG, Jeon SR, et al. Radiographic analysis of instrumented posterolateral fusion mass using mixture of local autologous bone and b-TCP (PolyBone) in a lumbar spinal fusion surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;49:267-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Hout WB. The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69(Suppl 1):i89-i91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008;8:8-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Sanidad. Norma Estatal de los GRD AP 2014. Accessed 2017. Available at https://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/cmbdAnteriores.htm
   Google Scholar
• ORDEN 731. De la Consejerıa de Sanidad, por la que se fijan los precios públicos por la prestación de los servicios y actividades denaturaleza sanitaria de la red de centros de la Comunidad de Madrid. 2013. Accessed 2017. Available at: http://www.bocm.es/boletin/CM_Orden_BOCM/2013/09/10/BOCM-20130910-1%2C0.PDF
   Google Scholar
• eSalud. Información económica del sector sanitario. Accessed 2017. Available at: http://www.oblikue.com/bddcostes/
   Google Scholar
• Virk SS, Sandhu HS, Khan SN. Cost effectiveness analysis of graft options in spinal fusion surgery using a Markov model. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25:E204-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadísta. Annual labour cost survey 2015. Accessed 2017. Available at: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177027&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976596
   Google Scholar