Review article: the ethics of population policies

References

• Abadian, S. (1996). Women’s autonomy and its impact on fertility. World Development, 24(12), 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00075-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attfield, R. (2015). The ethics of the global environment. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2012). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. (2008). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. (2020). Famine, affluence, and procreation: Peter Singer and anti-natalism lite. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 23, 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10073-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boserup, E. (2014 [1965]). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. (1964). The Meaning of the Twentieth Century. George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brake, E., & Millum, J. (2018). Parenthood and procreation. In E. Zalta (Ed..), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/parenthood/
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, W., (1980). North‐South. A programme for survival ‐ The report of the independent commission on international development issues under the chairmanship of Willy Brandt. Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., & Lo, Y. (2016). Environmental ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed..), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-environmental
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, D., & Ibbitson, J. (2019). Empty planet: The shock of global population decline. Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cafaro, P. (2015). How many is too many?: The progressive argument for reducing immigration into the United States. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. B. (2013). Thinking like a planet: The land ethic and the earth ethic. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casal, P., & Williams, A. (1995). Rights, equality and procreation. Analyse & Kritik, 17(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1995-0107
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., & Haraway, D. eds. (2018). Making Kin Not population. Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conly, S. (2016). One child: Do we have a right to more? Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. (2018). Should we control world population? John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, S., & Petchesky, R. (2007). Reproductive and sexual rights: A feminist perspective. In Culture, society and sexuality (pp. 314–332). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cripps, E. (2015). Climate change, population, and justice: Hard choices to avoid tragic choices. Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 8(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.8.2.96
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. R., & Kalmuss, D. (1997). Topics for our times: Norplant coercion–an overstated threat. American Journal of Public Health, 87(4), 550–551. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.4.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Croix, D., & Gosseries, A. (2009). Population policy through tradable procreation entitlements. International Economic Review, 50(2), 507–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. (1968). The population bomb. Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, K. (2019). In the shadow of justice: Postwar liberalism and the remaking of political philosophy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. P., & Isaacs, S. L. (1993). Human rights and reproductive choice. Studies in Family Planning, 24(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. (1998). Eugenics: Some lessons from the Nazi Experience. In J. Harris (Ed.), The future of human reproduction: Ethics, choice and regulation. SØren Holm OUP, 55-65.
   Google Scholar
• Gosney, E. S., & Popenoe, P. (1929). Sterilization for human betterment. A summary of results of 6,000 operations in California, 1909–1929, The Macmillan Company. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, H. (2019). Climate change and optimum population. The Monist, 102(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/ony021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B. (2016). Reproductive rights and wrongs: The global politics of population control. South End Press
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, T. (2018). Climate change, moral integrity, and the obligation to reduce individual greenhouse gas emissions. Ethics, Policy, and Environment, 21(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2018.1448039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyward, C. (2012). A growing problem? Dealing with population increases in climate justice. Ethical Perspectives, 19(4), 703–732. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.19.4.2182832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., Rieder, T. N., & Earl, J. (2016). Population engineering and the fight against climate change. Social Theory and Practice, 42(4), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201642430
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D. R. (2010). Environmental ethics: The big questions. Whiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Butz, W. P., & Samir, K. C. (eds). (2014). World population and human capital in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malthus, T. R. D. (1798). Malthus:’An essay on the principle of population’. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, L. R. (1973). Human rights and population growth – A feminist perspective. International Journal of Health Services, 3(4), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.2190/BGEN-A8JK-3QQ4-J55N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, B. (2013). Maybe one: A personal and environmental argument for single child families. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth; A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (1999). The ethics of reproductive control. The Philosophical Forum, 30(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-806X.t01-1-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, E. H., Jennings, B., & Callahan, D. (1995). Long-acting contraceptives ethical guidance for policymakers and health care providers. The Hastings Center Report, 25(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3562503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtaugh, P. A. & Schlax, M. G., (2009), Reproduction and the Carbon Legacies of Individuals. Global Environmental Change, 19(1):14–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, A., & Sessions, G. (1984). The basic principles of deep ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Narveson, J. (1967). “Utilitarianism and new generations.”. Mind, 76(301), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXVI.301.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B. C., Landis MacKellar, F., & Lutz, W. (2005). Population and climate change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (1975). Lifeboat Earth. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(3), 273–292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsaretti, S. (2017). Children as negative externalities? Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 16(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X17706671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkert, F., & Sticker, M. (2020). Procreation, footprint and responsibility for climate change. The Journal of Ethics, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09345-z
   Google Scholar
• Pizzarossa, L. B. (2018). Here to stay: The evolution of sexual and reproductive health and rights in international human rights law. Laws, 7(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7030029
   Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J. (2001). Coercive population policies, procreative freedom, and morality. Philosophy & Geography, 4(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770123420
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T. (1983). The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryerson, W. N. (1994). Population communications international: Its role in family planning soap operas. Population and Environment, 15(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1996). Fertility and coercion. The University of Chicago Law Review, 63(3), 1035–1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (1981). The ultimate resource. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. L., & Kahn, H. (eds). (1984). Resourceful earth: A response to global 2000. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbock, B. (1995). Coercion and long-term contraceptives. The Hastings Center Report, 25(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3562507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangri, S. S. (1976). A feminist perspective on some ethical issues in population programs. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1086/493307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Final act of the international conference of human rights 1968 sect II item 16.
   Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, P. (2002). Equality and the duties of procreators. In Philosophy publications. Oxford University Press, 195-209.
   Google Scholar
• van Basshuysen, P., & Brandstedt, E. (2018). Comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab213
   Google Scholar
• Wattenberg, B. J. (2004). Fewer: How the new demography of depopulation will shape our future. Ivan R. Dee.
   Google Scholar
• Wissenburg, M. (1998). The rapid reproducers paradox: Population control and individual procreative rights. Environmental Politics, 7(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019808414394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), 074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, T. (2001). Overconsumption and procreation: Are they morally equivalent? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00185
   Google Scholar