https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-8351
References
- Anderson, E. (1999). What is the Point of Equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897
- Axelsen, D. V., & Nielsen, L. (2017). Essentially enough: elements of a plausible account of sufficientarianism. In C. Fourie & A. Rid (Eds.), What is Enough? Sufficiency, Justice, and Health (pp. 101–120). Oxford University Press.
- Axelsen, D. V., & Bidadanure, J. (2018). Unequally egalitarian? Defending the credentials of social egalitarianism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1443398
- Axelsen, D. V., & Nielsen, L. (2015). Sufficiency as freedom from duress. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12048
- Axelsen, D. V., & Nielsen, L. (2020). Harsh and disrespectful: rescuing moral agency from luck and choice. Social Theory and Practice, 46(4), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20201025101
- Benbaji, Y. (2005). The doctrine of sufficiency. Utilitas, 17(3), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820805001676
- Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2006). Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods. Ethics, 116(3), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1086/500524
- Casal, P. (2007). Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117(2), 296–326. https://doi.org/10.1086/510692
- Cordelli, C. (2015). Justice as fairness and relational resources. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12036
- Crisp, R. (2003). Equality, priority and compassion. Ethics, 113(4), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1086/373954
- Fourie, C. (2012). What is social equality? An analysis of status equality as a strongly egalitarian ideal. Res Publica, 18(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9162-2
- Gheaus, A. (2016). Hikers in flip-flops: Luck egalitarianism, democratic equality and the distribuenda of justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12198
- Huseby, R. (2010). Sufficiency: Restated and defended. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00338.x
- Meijers, T., & Vandamme, P. (2019). Equality, value pluralism and relevance: Is luck egalitarianism in one way good, but not all things considered? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438804
- Moles, A., & Parr, T. (2019). Distributions and relations: A hybrid account. Political Studies, 67(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718755589
- Nielsen, L. (2019). What is wrong with sufficiency? Res Publica, 25(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9377-y
- Parfit, D. (2006). Equality and Priority. In R. E. Goodin & P. Philip (Eds.), Contemporary political philosophy, an anthology (pp. 462–472). Blackwell Publishing.
- Scheffler, S. (2005). Choice, circumstance, and the value of equality. Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 4(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05049434
- Schemmel, C. (2011a). Distributive and relational equality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X11416774
- Schemmel, C. (2011b). Why relational egalitarians should care about distributions. Social Theory and Practice, 37(3), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201137323
- Shields, L. (2012). The prospects for sufficientarianism. Utilitas, 24(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820811000392