Do older adults make more risky decisions in the Hungry Donkey Task or in the Iowa Gambling Task?

References

• Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1086/261662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasov, P. D. (2015). Risk preferences in choices for self and others: Meta analysis and research directions. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1682569
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, P. E., Brady, B., Ebner, N. C., & Ruffman, T. (2020). Effects of age on emotion regulation, emotional empathy, and prosocial behavior. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby084
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, P. E., Ebner, N. C., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on prosociality in adult development and aging: Advancing theory within a multilevel framework. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, P. E., Ruffman, T., & Rendell, P. G. (2013). Age-related differences in social economic decision making: The ultimatum game. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2019). Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk. PloS one, 14(5), e0216566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A. S., Timpe, J. C., Edmonds, E. C., Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Denburg, N. L. (2013). Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Age-related changes in decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task. Emotion, 13(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle, J. N., Sheehan, A. H., Dahlben, B., & Gutchess, A. H. (2015). Aging, empathy, and prosociality. The Journals of Gerontology, 70(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt091
   Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 336–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123(11), 2189–2202. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.11.2189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitz, K. M., Salthouse, T. A., & Davis, H. P. (2014). Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: From 5 to 89 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035823
   Google Scholar
• Best, R., & Freund, A. M. (2021). Beyond money: Nonmonetary prosociality across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjälkebring, P., Västfjäll, D., Dickert, S., & Slovic, P. (2016). Greater emotional gain from giving in older adults: Age-related positivity bias in charitable giving. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500507196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2002). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22(1), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T., Hupp, J. M., Porter, B. L., & Coleman, C. E. (2020). The effect of prosody on decision making: Speech rate influences speed and quality of decisions. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9899-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory—a dynamic cognitive approach to decision-making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, S., Zayas, V., & Guthormsen, A. (2009). Neural correlates of decision making on a gambling task. Child Development, 80(4), 1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01318.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of Socioemotional Selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J. C. N., de Cardoso, C. O., Sneider-Bakos, D., Kristensen, C. H., & Fonseca, R. P. (2012). The effect of age on decision making according to the Iowa gambling task. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassotti, M., Aïte, A., Osmont, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2014). What have we learned about the processes involved in the Iowa Gambling Task from developmental studies? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini, E., Rosi, A., Ceccato, I., Ronchi, L., & Lecce, S. (2021). Prosociality in aging: The contribution of traits and empathic concern. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., Bunge, S. A., Latenstein, H., & van der Molen, M. W. (2005). Characterization of children’s decision making: Sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity. Child Neuropsychology, 11(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/092970490911261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2503_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., & van der Molen, M. W. (2007). Development of decision making in school-aged children and adolescents: Evidence from heart rate and skin conductance analysis. Child Development, 78(4), 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01066.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., Vendel, I., & van der Molen, M. W. (2003). Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: Insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(7), 1625–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00386-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, J., Wittmann, M. K., Abdurahman, A., Hargitai, L. D., Drew, D., Husain, M., & Lockwood, P. L. (2021). Ageing is associated with disrupted reinforcement learning whilst learning to help others is preserved. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24576-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & Van Aken, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children and adults. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2005). The ability to decide advantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons. Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, K. T., Moreira, J. F. G., & Telzer, E. H. (2017). But is helping you worth the risk? Defining prosocial risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein, G., McGillivray, S., & Finn, P. (2007). Older adults make less advantageous decision than younger adults: Cognitive and psychological correlates. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 13(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770707052X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X., Zhang, F., & Fung, H. H. (2019). Are older adults more willing to donate? The roles of donation form and social relationship. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(3), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx099
   Google Scholar
• Groppe, K., & Elsner, B. (2014). Executive function and food approach behavior in middle childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, C. J., Luciana, M., Conklin, H. M., & Yarger, R. (2004). Adolescents’ performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the development of decision making and ventromendial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, J., Harbaugh, W. T., Srivastava, S., Degras, D., & Mayr, U. (2016). A general benevolence dimension that links neural, psychological, eco- nomic, and life-span data on altruistic tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizenga, H. M., Crone, E. A., & Jansen, B. (2007). Decision-making in healthy children, adolescents and adults explained by the use of increasingly complex proportional reasoning rules. Developmental Science, 10(6), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00621.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isella, V., Mapelli, C., Morielli, N., Pelati, O., Franceschi, M., & Apollonio, I. M. (2008). Age-related quantitative and qualitative changes in decision making ability. Behavioral Neurology, 19(1–2), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/893727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., Keighley, J., Braver, T. S., & Green, L. (2011). Domain Independence and stability in young and older adults’ discounting of delayed rewards. Behavioural Processes, 87(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, Y., Chen, X. J., McDonald, K., & Boutin, B. (2020). Money for me and money for friend: An ERP study of social reward processing in adolescents and adults. Social Neuroscience, 15(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1653963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, Y., Pearson, J., & Huettel, S. A. (2014). Differential reward learning for self and others predicts self-reported altruism. PLoS One, 9(9), e107621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamar, M., & Resnick, S. M. (2004). Aging and prefrontal functions: Dissociating orbitofrontal and dorsolateral abilities. Neurobiology of Aging, 25(4), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebherr, M., Schiebener, J., Averbeck, H., & Brand, M. (2017). Decision making under ambiguity and objective risk in higher age–a review on cognitive and emotional contributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, P. L., Apps, M. A., Valton, V., Viding, E., & Roiser, J. P. (2016). Neurocomputational mechanisms of prosocial learning and links to empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(35), 9763–9768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603198113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L.H., & Della Sala, S. (2002). Age, executive function, and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez‐Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: A meta‐analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y., Yamagishi, T., Li, Y., & Kiyonari, T. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases with age across five economic games. PloS one, 11(7), e0158671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J., Gutoreva, A., Lee, M. H., Tan, P. N., Bruce, E. M., Székely, M., Ankush, T., Sakaguchi, H., Walasek, L., & Ludvig, E. A. (2020). Decision‐makers use social information to update their preferences but choose for others as they do for themselves. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasion, R., Goncalves, A. R., Fernandes, C., Ferreira-Santos, F., Barbosa, F., & Marques-Teixeira, J. (2017). Meta-analytic evidence for a reversal learning effect on the Iowa gambling task in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, E., & Wu, K. (2020). Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 77, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosi, A., Cavallini, E., Gamboz, N., & Russo, R. (2016). On the generality of the effect of experiencing prior gains and losses on the Iowa Gambling Task: A study on young and old adults. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(2), 185–196 https://journal.sjdm.org/15/151216/jdm151216.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosi, A., Nola, M., Lecce, S., & Cavallini, E. (2019). Prosocial behavior in aging: Which factors can explain age-related differences in social-economic decision making? International Psychogeriatrics, 31(12), 1747–1757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610219000061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2017). Age-related variance in decisions under ambiguity is explained by changes in reasoning, executive functions, and decision-making under risk. Cognition & Emotion, 31(4), 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1159944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. D. G., & Parente, M. A. D. M. P. (2006). Decision-making capacity of young adults and older adults as measured by Iowa Gambling Task. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 19(3), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722006000300013
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, K. L., Abiodun, S. J., Fenn, Z., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Mata, R. (2022). Temporal discounting across adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 37(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, K. L., Gorlick, M. A., Vekaria, K. M., Hsu, M., Zald, D. H., & Samanez-Larkin, G. R. (2016). Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 737. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, E. P., Swirsky, L. T., Kudos, F., & Spaniol, J. (2021). Aging and altruism: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Horstmann, A., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze, J. A., Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion, 12(5), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 562–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venneri, A., Molinari, M. A., Pentore, R., Cotticelli, B., Nichelli, P., & Caffarra, P. (1992). Shortened Stroop color word test: Its application in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 13, S3–S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-4580(92)90135-K
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Denburg, N. L. (2011). Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from ages 5 to 85. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S., Busemeyer, J., Koling, A., Cox, C. R., & Davis, H. (2005). Older adults as adaptive decision makers: Evidence from the Iowa gambling task. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamarian, L., Sinz, H., Bonatti, E., Gamboz, N., & Delazer, M. (2008). Normal aging affects decision under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk. Neuropsychology, 22(5), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar