The contribution of discursive and cognitive factors in referential choices made by elderly people during a narrative task

References

• Achim, A. M., Achim, A., & Fossard, M. (2017). Knowledge likely held by others affects speaker’s choices of referential expressions at different stages of discourse. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1234059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achim, A. M., Fossard, M., Couture, S., & Achim, A. (2015). Adjustment of speaker’s referential expressions to an addressee’s likely knowledge and link with theory of mind abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achim, A. M., Ouellet, R., Roy, M. A., & Jackson, P. L. (2012). Mentalizing in first episode psychosis. Psychiatry Research, 196, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain, P., Nicoleau, S., Pinon, K., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Barreé, J., Berrut, G., Dubas, F., & Le Gall, D. (2005). Executive functioning in normal aging: A study of action planning using the Zoo Map Test. Brain & Cognition, 57(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariel, M. (1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E. (2001). The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse processes, 31, 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., & Griffin, Z. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard, S., Erkes, J., & Moroni, C. (2009). Test du Stroop Victoria : adaptation francophone. Matériel, consignes, procédure de cotation et données normatives. NPG Neurologie-Psychiatrie-Gériatrie, 20(115), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudreau, S. A., Storandt, M., & Strube, M. J. (2006). A comparison of narratives told by younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 3, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730500326481
   Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & McComas Maddy, K. (2016). Microlinguistic processes that contribute to the ability to relay main events: Influence of age. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 23(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2015.1118006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2005). CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. The Journal of Communication, 38(6), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne Lavau, M., Fossard, M., Martel, G., Chapdelaine, C., Blouin, G., Rodriguez, J. P., & Stip, E. (2009). Do patients with schizophrenia attribute mental states in a referential communication task?. Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 14(3), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800903004114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Van der Lely, H. K. J. (2008). Narrative discourse in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0357-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contemori, C., & Dussias, P. E. (2016). Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 1257–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1220604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, M. C., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing language. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 6, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, M. C., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2017). Hippocampal contributions to language use and processing. In D. Hannula & M. Duff (Eds.), The hippocampus from cells to systems (pp. 503–536). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, M. C., Gupta, R., Hengst, J., Tranel, D., & Cohen, N. J. (2011). The use of definite references signals declarative memory: Evidence from patients with hippocampal amnesia. Psychological Science, 22(5), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611404897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Henderson, A., Wright, H. H., & Rogalski, Y. (2016). Global coherence during discourse production in adults: A review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faroqi-Sah, Y., Treanor, A., Bernstein Ratner, N., Ficek, B., Webster, K., & Tsapkini, K. (2020). Using narratives in differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative syndromes. Journal of Communication Disorders, 85, 105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.105994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2011). Productive vocabulary across discourse types. Aphasiology, 25(10), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.606974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossard, M., Achim, A. M., Rousier Vercruyssen, L., Gonzalez, S., Bureau, A., & Champagne Lavau, M. (2018). Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task: Discourse stages and referential complexity matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumura, K., Van Gompel, R., & Pickering, M. J. (2010). The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1700–1715. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903490969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010). Attenuating information in spoken communication: For the speaker, or for the addressee?. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilet, A. L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroy, O., & le Groupe de Réflexion pour l’Evaluation des Fonctions Exécutives (GREFX). (2008). Fonctions exécutives et pathologies neurologiques et psychiatriques: Evaluation en pratique clinique. Marseille: Solal.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of anaphoric expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P. (2016). Cognitive modeling of individual variation in reference production and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., Englert, C., Wubs, E., & Hoeks, J. (2008). Age differences in adults’ use of referring expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 17, 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-008-9065-6
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., Koster, C., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2014). Referential choice across the lifespan: Why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.766356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Spieler, D. H. (2007). Age-related difference in communication and audience design. Psychology and Aging, 22, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos-Rabadán, O., Pereiro, A. X., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2005). Narrative speech in aging: Quantity, information content, and cohesion. Brain and Language, 95(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavé, G., & Goral, M. (2017). Do age-related word retrieval difficulties appear (or disappear) in connected speech?. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(5), 508527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2016.1226249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. S., Kim, Y. B., & Kim, H. (2017). Discourse measures to differentiate between mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 11, 221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkki, S. M., Richter, F. R., Jeyarathnarajah, P., & Simons, J. S. (2020). Healthy ageing reduces the precision of episodic memory retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 35(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijper, S. J. N., Hartman, C. A., & Hendriks, P. (2015). Who is he? Children with ASD and ADHD take the listener into account in their production of ambiguous pronouns. Plos One, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysander, K., & Horton, W. S. (2012). Conversational grounding in younger and older adults: The effect of partner visibility and referent abstractness in task-oriented dialogue. Discourse processes, 49(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.625547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C. (2000). Adult spoken discourse: The influences of age and education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/136828200247188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Boewe, A., Caltagirone, C., & Carlomagno, S. (2005). Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(5), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6203-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-27277490003-6
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, N., Rauzy, S., Viallet, F., & Champagne Lavau, M. (2016). Theory of Mind in Alzheimer disease: Evidence of authentic impairment during social interaction. Neuropsychology, 30, 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Jeffrey L. Cummings, Howard Chertkow. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. A., Cramond, P. M., & Hayward-Mayhew, C. (2014). Spoken language production in adults: Examining age-related differences in syntactic complexity. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.841292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Grison, S., Gao, X., Christianson, K., Morrow, D. G., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2014). Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: Evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities. Cognition, 130(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, N., Gonçalves, A. P. B., Goulart, M., Tarrasconi, M. A., Kochhann, R., & Fonseca, R. P. (2019). Age-related differences in conversational discourse abilities a comparative study. Dementia and Neuropsychologia, 13(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-010006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed effects models in S and S-plus. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pistono, A., Pariente, J., Bézy, C., Pastor, J., Tran, T. M., Renard, A., Fossard, M., Nespoulous, J.-L., & Jucla, M. (2017). Inter-individual variability in discourse informativeness in elderly populations. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(5), 391408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1277390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. W., Apperly, I. A., & Samson, D. (2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dualtask study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, H., Harder-Kasten, A., & Sturm, L. (2011). The decline of theory of mind in old age is (partly) mediated by developmental changes in domain-general abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02040.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-90005107-0
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., Aveni, K., Basque, S., Orange, J. B., McLaughlin, P., Ramirez, J., Troyer, A. K., Gutierrez, S., Chen, A., Bartha, R., Binns, M. A., Black, S. E., Casaubon, L. K., Dowlatshahi, D., Hassan, A., Kwan, D., Levine, B., Mandzia, J., Sahlas, D. J., & Swartz, R. (2021). Predicting cognitive impairment in cerebrovascular disease using spoken discourse production. Topics in Language Disorders, 41(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. D., Watson, P. D., Duff, M., & Cohen, N. J. (2014). The role of hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, 742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoz, M., Iglesias, K., Achim, A. M., Démonet, J. F., & Fossard, M. (2020). Referential adjustment during discourse production in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(7), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1798883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saryazdi, R., Bannon, J., & Chambers, C. G. (2019). Age-related differences in referential production: A multiple-measures study. Psychology and Aging, 34(6), 791. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafto, M. A., Burke, D. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). On the tip-of-the-tongue: Neural correlates of increased word-finding failures in normal aging. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19(2), 2060–2070. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2060
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney, J. A., Rosano, C., Berman, R. A., & Luna, B. (2001). Inhibitory control of attention declines more than working memory during normal aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 22(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00175-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaudeau, E., Cellard, C., Legendre, M., Villeneuve, K., & Achim, A. M. (2018). Reliability of two social cognition tests: The combined stories test and the social knowledge test. Psychiatry Research, 262, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, M., Adam, S., & Agniel, A., & les membres du Gremem. (2004). L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. Présentation de quatre tests de mémoire épisodique (avec leur étalonnage). Solal.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels, J., Krahmer, E. J., & Maes, A. A. (2015). How cognitive load influences speakers’ choice of referring expressions. Cognitive science, 39, 1396–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS–IV) technical and interpretive manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wecker, N. S., Kramer, J. H., Hallam, B. J., & Delis, D. C. (2005). Mental flexibility: Age effects on switching. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P., & Emslie, H. (1996). Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Bury St. Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2009). Manipulating task instructions to change narrative discourse performance. Aphasiology, 23(10), 1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902826844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., Srinivasan, C., & Fergadiotis, G. (2011). Story processing ability in cognitively healthy younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Hearing Research, 54(3), 900–17. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-43882010/09-0253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. O., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2019). Evidence of preserved audience design with aging in interactive conversation. Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 613. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2019). Aging of the frontal lobe. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 163, 369–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar