Recognizing tactile representations of familiar objects: the influence of pre-cuing when touch replaces vision as the dominant sense modality

References

• Heller MA. Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception. 1989;18(3): 379–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MA. Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people. Behav Brain Res. 2002;135(1–2):65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Heller MA, Brackett DD, Scroggs E. Tangible picture matching by people who are visually impaired. J Visual Impair Blind. 2002;96(5): 349–353.
   Google Scholar
• Heller MA, Calcaterra JA, Burson LL, Tyler LA. Tactual picture identification by blind and sighted people: effects of providing categorical information. Percept Psychophys. 1996;58(2):310–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heller MA, Wilson K, Steffen H, Yoneyama K, Brackett DD. Superior haptic perceptual selectivity in late-blind and very- low-vision subjects. Perception. 2003;32(4):499–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angiulli A, Kennedy JM, Heller MA. Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scand J Psychol. 1998;39(9):187–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graven T. Aspects of object recognition: when touch replaces vision as the dominant sense modality. Visual Impair Res. 2003;5(2):101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy JM. (1980). Blind people recognizing and making haptic pictures. In: MA Hagen, editor. The perception of pictures. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1980;263–303.
   Google Scholar
• Millar S. Visual experience or translation rules? Drawing the human figure by blind and sighted children. Perception 1975;4(4): 363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar S. A reversed lag in the recognition and production of tactual drawings: theoretical implications for haptic coding. In: MA Heller, W Schiff, editors. The psychology of touch. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991;301–325.
   Google Scholar
• Heller MA, Joyner T. Mechanisms in the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion: evidence from sighted and blind subjects. Percept Psychophys. 1993;53(4):422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor N, Hermelin B. Modality-specific spatial co-ordinates. Percept Psychophys. 1975;17(2):213–216.
   Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ. (1987). The intelligent hand. In: GH Bower, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1987;121–149.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn SM. Image and brain. The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255(5044):256–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar S. Memory in touch. Psicothema. 1999;11(4):747–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornoldi C, Vecchi T. Mental imagery in blind people: the role of passive and active visuospatial processes. In: MA Heller, editor. Touch, representation, and blindness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000;143–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy JM. How the blind draw. Blind and sighted people use many of the same devises in sketching their surroundings, suggesting that vision and touch are closely linked. Sci Am. 1997;276(1):76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Chataway C, Summers CD. Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects. Percept Psychophys. 1990;47(1):54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Reed C. There’s more to touch than meets the eye: the salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1987;116(4):356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton RD, Srinivas K, Green AJ. Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit. 1997;23(1):153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar S. Modality and mind: convergent active processing in interrelated networks as a model of development and perception by touch. In: MA Heller, editor. Touch, representation, and blindness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000;99–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lobb H. Asymmetrical transfer of form discrimination across sensory modalities in human adults. J Exp Psychol. 1970;86(3):350–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millar S. Visual and haptic cue utilization by preschool children: the recognition of visual and haptic stimuli presented separately and together. J Exp Child Psychol. 1971;12(1):88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostad SA. Strategic competence: issues in task-specific strategies in arithmetic. Nord Stud Math Educ. 1997;5(3):7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler RS, Jenkins E. How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostad SA. Mathematics through the fingertips. Basic mathematics for the blind pupil: development and empirical testing of tactile representations. Hosle: The Norwegian Institute for Special Education, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Reisberg D, Chambers D. Neither pictures nor propositions: what can we learn from a mental image. Can J Psychol. 1991;45(3):336–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ. Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Percept Psychophys. 1995;57(8):1111–1123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollins M. Note: Styles of mental imagery in blind adults. Neuropsychologia. 1985;23(4): 561–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Metzger VA. Identifying objects by touch: an ‘expert system’. Percept Psychophys. 1985;37(4):299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar