Perceptual and acoustic evidence of speaker adaptation to a thin pseudopalate

References

• Subtelny J, Worth JM. Intraoral air pressure and rate of flow during speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1966; 9: 498–518
   Google Scholar
• Barlow S, Abbs J. Force transducers for the evaluation of labial, lingual, and mandibular motor impairments. J Speech Hear Res. 1983; 26: 616–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujimura O, Kiritani S, Ishida H. Computer controlled radiography for observation of movements of articulation and other human organs. Comput Bio Med. 1973; 3: 371–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher S, McCutcheon M, Wolf M. Dynamic palatography. J Speech Hear Res. 1975; 18: 812–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardcastle W, Gibbon F, Jones W. Visual display of tongue-palate contact: electropalatography in the assessment and remediation of speech disorders. British J Dis Comm. 1991; 26: 41–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher S. Palatometric specification of stop, affricate and sibilant sounds. J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32: 736–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbon F, Wood S. Articulatory drift in the speech of children with articulation/phonological disorders. Percept Mot Skill. 2002; 95: 295–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbon F, Hardcastle W, Nicolaidis K. Temporal and spatial aspects of coarticulation in /kl/ sequences: a cross-linguistic investigation. Lang Speech. 1993; 36: 261–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle W, Gibbon F, Scoobie J. Phonetic and phonological aspects of English affricate production in children with speech disorders. Phonetica. 1995; 52: 242–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown W, McGlone R, Proffit W. Relationship of lingual and intraoral air pressure during syllable productions. J Speech Hear Res. 1973; 16: 141–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeper H, Appl F. Lingual-palatal pressure measurement and analysis techniques. J Speech Hear Res. 1975; 18: 588–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGlone R, Proffit W. Lingual pressures associated with speaker consistency and syllabic variations. Phonetica. 1967; 17: 178–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch BE, Goozee JV, Veidt M, Scott DH, Meyers IA. Introducing the pressure-sensing palatograph—the next frontier in electropalatography. Clin Linguist Phon. 2004; 18: 433–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searl J. Comparison of transducers and intra-oral placement options for measuring lingua-palatal contact pressure during speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46: 1444–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone R, Proffit W, Christensen R. Lingual pressures associated with alveolar consonants. J Speech Hear Res. 1967; 10: 606–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proffit W, Palmer J, Kydd W. Evaluation of tongue pressures during speech. Folia Phoniat. 1965; 17: 115–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe M, Ward E, Murdoch B. Articulatory function in hypokinetic dysarthria: An electropalatographic examination of two cases J Med Speech Lang Path. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes S, Zhen F. An electropalatographic description of Putonghua fricatives and affricates. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear. 1998; 3: 69–78
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe M, Ward E, Murdoch B. Speech production in Parkinson's disease: I. An electropalatographic investigation of tongue-palate contact patterns. Clin Ling Phon. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber S, Spiedel T, Siegel G, Miller E, Glass L. The effects of presentation of noise and dental appliances on speech. J Speech Hearing Res. 1980; 23: 838–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baum S, McFarland D. Individual differences in speech adaptation to an artificial palate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107: 3572–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum S, McFarland D. The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102: 2353–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlet S, Stone M. Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental prostheses. J Phonetics. 1976; 4: 199–218
   Google Scholar
• Flege J. Plasticity in adult and child speech production. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976; 79: S54
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher S. Articulation: A Physiological Approach. Singular Publishing Group, Inc, San Diego, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• McFarland D, Baum S, Chabot C. Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 100: 1093–1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlet S, Stone M. Compensatory alveolar consonant production induced by wearing a dental prosthesis. J Phonetics. 1978; 6: 227–48
   Google Scholar
• Buder E, Kent R, Kent J, Milenkovic P, Workinger M. FORMOFFA: an automated formant, moment, fundamental frequency, amplitude analysis of normal and disordered speech. Clin Linguist Phon. 1996; 10: 31–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson H, Shriberg L, Flipsen P, McSweeny J. Acoustic phenotypes for speech-genetics studies: toward an acoustic marker for residual /s/ distortions. Clin Linguist Phon. 2002; 16: 403–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden K, Turner G. Spectral properties of fricatives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40: 1358–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland D, Baum S. Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97: 1865–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso A, Burton E. Temporal acoustic measures of dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1987; 30: 80–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichikawa T, Komoda J, Horiuchi K, Matsumoto N. Influence of alterations in the oral environment on speech production. J Oral Rehab. 1995; 22: 295–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum S, McFarland D, Diab M. Compensation to articulatory perturbation: Perceptual data. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 99: 3791–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose H, Gay T. The activity of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles in voicing control. Phonetica. 1972; 25: 140–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R, Moll K. Vocal-tract characteristics of the stop cognates. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969; 46: 1549–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlet S, Cullison B, Stone M. Physiological control of sibilant duration: Insights afforded by speech compensation to dental prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979; 65: 1278–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom B, Lubker J, Gay T. Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation. J Phonetics. 1979; 7: 147–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren D, Nelson G, Allen G. Effects of increased vertical dimension on size of constriction port and fricative sound intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 67: 1828–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso J, Tuller B. Compensatory articulation’ under conditions of reduced afferent information: A dynamic formulation. J Speech Hear Res. 1983; 26: 217–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCrosky R, Corely N, Jackson G. The relative contributions of auditory and tactile cues to certain aspects of speech. South Speech J. 1958; 24: 84–90
   Google Scholar
• Putnam A, Ringel R. A cineradiographic study of articulation in two talkers with temporarily induced oral sensory deprivation. J Speech Hear Res. 1976; 19: 241–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringel R, Steer M. Some effects of tactile and auditory alterations on speech output. J Speech Hear Res. 1963; 6: 369–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott C, Ringel R. Articulation without oral sensory control. J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 804–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar