Autistic traits and attention to speech: Evidence from typically developing individuals

References

• Klin A. Young autistic children’s listening preferences in regard to speech: a possible characterization of the symptom of social withdrawal. J Autism Dev Disord. 1991;21:29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceponiene R, Lepistö T, Shestakova A, Vanhala R, Alku P, Näätänen R, et al. Speech-sound-selective auditory impairment in children with autism: they can perceive but do not attend. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:5567–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai K, Hashimoto O, Kawakubo Y, Yumoto M, Kamio S, Itoh K, et al. Delayed automatic detection of change in speech sounds in adults with autism: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:1655–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepistö T, Silokallio S, Nieminen-von Wendt T, Alku P, Näätänen R, Kujala T. Auditory perception and attention as reflected by the brain event-related potentials in children with Asperger syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:2161–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed P, Lowe C, Everett R. Perceptual learning and perceptual search are altered in male university students with higher Autism Quotient scores. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;51:732–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss AP, Kritikos A. Brief report: perceptual load and the autism spectrum in typically developed individuals. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41:1573–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzzo I, Cooper NR, Vetter P, Russo R, Fitzgerald PB. Reduced cortico-motor facilitation in a normal sample with high traits of autism. Neurosci Lett. 2009;467:173–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart ME, Ota M. Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with ‘autistic’ traits. Cognition. 2008;109:157–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura Y, Kikuchi M, Ueno S, Okumura E, Hiraishi H, Hasegawa C, et al. The brain’s response to the human voice depends on the incidence of autistic traits in the general population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80126.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar M, Brown GDA, Della Sala S. Restoring primacy in amnesic free recall: Evidence for the recency theory of primacy. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011;28:386–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle HA, Welsh A. Acoustic masking in primary memory. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1976;15:17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes RW. Auditory distraction: a duplex-mechanism account. Psych J. 2014;3:30–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klapp ST, Mashburn EA, Lester PT. Short-term memory does not involve the working memory of information processing – the demise of a common assumption. Journal of Experimental Psycholology. 1983;112:240–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jones DM, Madden C, Miles C. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1992;44:645–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JS, Martin FH, Thomson RH. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation. Biol Psychol. 2010;85;62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DM, Hughes RW, Macken WJ. Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable. Noise Health. 2010;12:201–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salame P, Baddeley A. Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: implications for the structure of working memory. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 1982;21:150–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cedrus Corporation. SuperLab, Stimulus Presentation Software (Pro 4.5) [computer software]. 2011; San Pedro, CA, USA. Cedrus Corporation. 2011; Available at: http://www.superlab.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.05) [computer program]. 2011. Available at: http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Jones DM, Miles C, Page J. Disruption of proof-reading by irrelevant speech: effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1990;4:89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen JD, Baddeley A. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology. 2003;56:1249–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin H, Roine M. Sosiologian peruskurssi; johdanto [Basic course on sociology; introduction]. 2008. Available at: http://www.uta.fi/avoinyliopisto/arkisto/sosiologia/luku1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lennes, M. SpeCT - The Speech Corpus Toolkit for Praat; save intervals to wav sound files. 2011. Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/∼lennes/praat-scripts/#cutting.
   Google Scholar
• Moulines E, Charpentier F. Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication. 1990;9:453–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S. Olennainen ero: totuus miehen ja naisen aivoista [The Essential Difference: Male And Female Brains And The Truth About Autism]. Pietiläinen K, trans. Helsinki: Terra Cognita; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermeier W, Zimmer K. Individual differences in susceptibility to the ‘irrelevant speech effect’. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:2191–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken WJ, Tremblay S, Alford D, Jones D. Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption. International Journal of Psychology. 1999;34:322–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse AJO, Bishop DVM. Do children with autism ‘switch off’ to speech sounds? An investigation using event-related potentials. Dev Sci. 2008;11:516–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar