258
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Normative nasalance scores for Vietnamese-speaking children

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 51-57 | Received 25 Jan 2017, Accepted 04 Oct 2017, Published online: 26 Oct 2017

References

  • Bradford LJ, Brooks AR, Shelton RL. Clinical judgment of hypernasality in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J 1964;35:329–35.
  • Counihan DT, Cullinan WL. Reliability and dispersion of nasality ratings. Cleft Palate J 1970;7:261–70.
  • Lewis KE, Watterson TL, Houghton SM. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. J Commun Disord 2003;36:49–58.
  • Scarmagnani RH, Oliveira ACdASFd, Fukushiro AP, et al. Impact of inter-judge agreement on perceptual judgment of nasality. CoDAS 2014;26:357–9.
  • Bressmann T. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:423–33.
  • Brunnegard K, van Doorn J. Normative data on nasalance scores for Swedish as measured on the Nasometer: influence of dialect, gender, and age. Clin Linguist Phon 2009;23:58–69.
  • Brunnegard K, Lohmander A, van Doorn J. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;47:556–66.
  • Mishima K, Sugii A, Yamada T, et al. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:8–10.
  • Mayo C, Mayo R. Normative nasalance values across languages. ECHO 2011;6:22–32.
  • Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;37:351–5.
  • Park M, Baek WS, Lee E, et al. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:173–7.
  • Ha S, Cho SH. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children: Effects of age, vowel context, and stimulus length. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1235–9.
  • El-Kassabi RM, Hassan S, Mesallam TA, et al. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2015;40:77–85.
  • Van Lierde KM, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Age-related patterns of nasal resonance in normal Flemish children and young adults. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;37:344–50.
  • Rochet A, Sovis E, Mielke D. Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of Western Canadian English and French. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1998;22:94–103.
  • Hirschberg J, Bok S, Juhasz M, et al. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:785–98.
  • van Doorn J, Purcell A. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:287–92.
  • Van der Heijden P, Hobbel HH, Van der Laan BF, et al. Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:420–4.
  • Luyten A, D'Haeseleer E, Hodges A, et al. Normative nasalance data in Ugandan English-speaking children. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2012;64:131–6.
  • Whitehill TL. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:119–25.
  • Haapanen ML. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1991;43:197–203.
  • Van Lierde KM, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:112–18.
  • Marino VC, Cardoso VM, Ramos RG, Dutka Jde C. Nasalance values for syllables produced by Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Codas 2016;28:278–83
  • Marino VC, Dutka Jde C, de Boer G, et al. Normative Nasalance Scores for Brazilian Portuguese using new speech stimuli. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2015;67:238–44.
  • Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715–21.
  • Nichols AC. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:57–63.
  • Kuppusamy G, Ramaswamy G, Mariswamy P. Normative nasalance values across stimuli and gender in Malayalam speaking individuals. Otolaryngol Online J 2013;3:1–12.
  • Kim H-K, Yu X-m, Cao Y-j, et al. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance for a Mandarin population. Clin Linguist Phon 2016;30:119–30.
  • Ibrahim HM, Reilly S, Kilpatrick N. Normative nasalance scores for the Malay language. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49:e61–3.
  • Lee A, Browne U. Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2013;38:167–72.
  • Hamdan AL, Ziade G, Jabbour J, et al. Nasalance scores in Lebanese English-speaking adults using nasometric analysis. J Med Liban 2015;63:203–8.
  • D'Haeseleer E, Bettens K, De Mets S, et al. Normative data and dialectical effects on nasalance in Flemish adults. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2015;67:42–8.
  • Okalidou A, Karathanasi A, Grigoraki E. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phon 2011;25:671–88.
  • Maturo DS, Pirola MN, Ricz LN, Trawitzki LV. Nasalance of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking populations from two different states. Codas 2017;29:e20160041.
  • Tachimura T, Mori C, Hirata SI, Wada T. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of Mid-West Japanese dialect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:463–7.
  • Sweeney T, Sell D, O'Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:168–74.
  • Kavanagh M, Fee E, Kalinowski J, et al. Nasometric values for three dialectal groups within the Atlantic provinces of Canada. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1994;18:7–13.
  • Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, et al. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:143–9.
  • Fletcher SG. Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality. J Speech Hear Disord 1972;37:329–46.
  • Fairbanks G. Voice and Articulation Drillbook. New York: Harper and Row; 1960.
  • Fletcher SG. Diagnosing Speech Disorders from Cleft Palate. New York: Grune and Stratron; 1978.
  • Cham N. Đánh giá chức năng phát âm của bệnh nhân khe hở môi vòm miệng sau phẫu thuật 6 tháng tại Bệnh viện Việt Nam-Cuba năm 2012 (Evaluation of speech function of cleft lip and palate patients 6 months after operation at Vietnam-Cuba Hospital in 2012): Hanoi Medical University; 2012.
  • Vogel I, Tseng I, Yap N. Syllable Structure in Vietnamese. TEAL Conference National Tsing-Hua University, Taiwan; 2004.
  • Ngo BN, Tran BH. The Vietnamese language learning framework. Part 1: Linguistics. J Southeast Asian Lang Teach 2001;10:1–24.
  • Hanh V, Nghien N, Cuong H. Mẫu cấu âm thay thế của người bị khe hở vòm miệng (Articulation errors of cleft palate children). Tap Chi Nghien Cuu y Hoc 2004;28:54–8.
  • Pham HL. Xây dựng bài tập chỉnh âm kết hợp giáo dục ngôn ngữ cho học sinh tiểu học bị khe hở môi vòm miệng sau phẫu thuật (Building speech therapy exercises for primary school pupils with cleft lip and palate slot after surgery). Tạp Chí Khoa Học ĐHSP TPHCM 2014;65:83–91.
  • Thompson AE, Hixon TJ. Nasal air flow during normal speech production. Cleft Palate J 1979;16:412–20.
  • Litzaw LL, Dalston RM. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. J Commun Disord 1992;25:55–64.
  • Watterson T, Lewis K, Brancamp T. Comparison of Nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6200 and the Nasometer II 6400. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:574–9.
  • Awan SN, Virani A. Nasometer 6200 Versus Nasometer II 6400: Effect on Measures of Nasalance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2013;50:268–74.
  • De Boer G, Bressmann T. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometers 6200 and 6450. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014;51:90–7.
  • Watterson T, Lewis KE. Test-retest nasalance score variability in hypernasal speakers. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:415–9.
  • Hardin MA, Van Demark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:346–51.
  • Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:184–8.
  • Watterson T, McFarlane SC, Wright DS. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. J Commun Disord 1993;26:13–28.
  • Watterson T, Lewis KE, Foley-Homan N. Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:243–7.
  • Fale I, Faria I. Nasometric values for European Portuguese: preliminary results. ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics; Athens, Greece; 2008.
  • Anderson RT. Nasometric values for normal Spanish-speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:333–6.
  • Karakoc O, Akcam T, Birkent H, et al. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Turkish population. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:520–2.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.