The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids

References

• Rönnberg J. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:S68–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, et al. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol. 2008;47:S99–S105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016;37:5S–27S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys SL, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, et al. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Lang Cognitive Proc. 2012;27:953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto JE, Juujärvi P, Kooistra L, et al. Dimensions of executive functioning: evidence from children. Br J Develop Psychol. 2003;21:59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just MA, Carpenter PA. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev. 1992;99:122–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulin C, Campbell T. Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: some preliminary data. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;79:55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman M, Carpenter AC. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verb Learning Verb Behav. 1980;19:450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson J, Dodd B. Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers’ voices on children’s processing of spoken language? J Voice. 2005;19:47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Brännström KJ, Sahlén BS. On the interaction of speakers’ voice quality, ambient noise and task complexity with children's listening comprehension and cognition. Front Psychol. 2015;6:871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Haake M, Brännström J, et al. Does the speaker’s voice quality influence children's performance on a language comprehension test?. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Holm L, Kastberg T, et al. Are children with stronger cognitive capacity more or less disturbed by classroom noise and dysphonic teachers? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:1–12. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Kastberg T, von Lochow H, et al. The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing. Speech Lang Hear. 2018;21:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hygge S, Kjellberg A, Nostl A. Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA, Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;97:593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health. 2010;12:263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman H, Sullivan JR. Children’s auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57:1503–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1996;17:133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear. 2004;25:98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. JARO. 2008;9:399–406.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BC, Glasberg B, Schlueter A. Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandell CC, Smaldino JJ. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000;31:362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold LJ, Hillock-Dunn A, Duncan N, et al. Influence of hearing loss on children’s identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. Ear Hear. 2013;34:575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles DJ, McGregor KK, Bentler RA. Vocabulary and working memory in children fit with hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:154–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WISC-IV integrated. Wechsler intelligence scale for children – Fourth edition – Integrated [Manual]. London: Pearson Assessment; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. ISO 8253-1. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods part 1: basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. International Organization for Standardization 8253-1. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M, et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol. 2010;49:891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Holm L, Lyberg Åhlander V, et al. Children’s subjective ratings and opinions of typical and dysphonic voice after performing a language comprehension task in background noise. J Voice. 2015;29:624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TolvanData. Visual sort and rate - Visor. Elektronisk källa från http://www.tolvan.com/index.php?page=/visor/visor.php, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• von Lochow H, Lyberg Åhlander V, Sahlén B, et al. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: performance in relation to cognitive functioning in children with normal hearing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43:11–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. ISO 8253-3. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods part 3: Speech audiometry. International Organization for Standardization 8253-3;1996.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwall K. Godnattsagor om Anders, nästan 4. Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Komesaroff L, Komersaroff PA, Hyde M. Ethical issues in cochlear implantation. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014; p. 815–26.
   Google Scholar
• 2016:46 S. Coordination, responsibility and communication – the road to increased quality for students with disabilities. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry of Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ibertsson T. Cognition and communication in children/adolescents with cochlear implant. Lund: Lund University; 2009.
   Google Scholar