Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis

References

• Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Dailey SH, et al. Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(1_suppl):1–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy N, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Eadie T, et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):212–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates J. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61(1):49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH. Assessment of voice and respiratory function. In: Remacle M, Eckel EH, editors. Surgery of larynx and trachea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann-Bauser M, Drinnan MJ. Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19(3):165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Summary statement: workshop on acoustic voice analysis. Iowa City, IA: National Center for Voice and Speech. 1995; p. 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sataloff RT. Vocal health and pedagogy, Vol. II: advanced assessment and practice. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, et al. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice. 2010;24(5):540–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108(4):1867–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell SY, Colton RH, Kelley RT, et al. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral-and spectral-based measures during continuous speech. J Voice. 2013;27(4):393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zraick RI, Wendel K, Smith-Olinde L. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice. J Voice. 2005;19(4):574–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heman-Ackah YD, Michael DD, Goding JG. The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. J Voice. 2002;16(1):20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CJ, Blalock PD, Kemp SE, et al. Differentiation of adductor-type spasmodic dysphonia from muscle tension dysphonia by spectral analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(4):576–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar BR, Bhat JS, Prasad N. Cepstral analysis of voice in persons with vocal nodules. J Voice. 2010;24(6):651–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmann-Bauser M, Drinnan MJ, Carding PN. Are Jitter and Shimmer comparable to perceptual voice analysis in healthy voices?. Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Phoniatrics and Speech Pathology, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zürich. Jan; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Latoszek BB, Maryn Y, Gerrits E, et al. A meta-analysis: acoustic measurement of roughness and breathiness. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(2):298–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Roy N. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four‐factor acoustic model. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(1):35–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258(2):77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN. The voice diagnostic protocol: a practical guide to the diagnosis of voice disorders. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Doyle PC. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. J Voice. 2005;19(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Roy N, Jetté ME, et al. Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010;24(9):742–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll AM. Short‐time spectrum and “cepstrum” techniques for vocal‐pitch detection. J Acous Soc Am. 1964;36(2):296–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, et al. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;126(5):2619–2634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heman-Ackah YD, Michael DD, Baroody MM, et al. Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(4):324–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godino-Llorente JI, Osma-Ruiz V, Sáenz-Lechón N, et al. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders. J Voice. 2010;24(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Barsties B, et al. The value of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(6):1609–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heman-Ackah YD, Sataloff RT, Laureyns G, et al. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia. J Voice. 2014;28(6):783–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanvand A, Salehi A, Ebrahimipour M. A cepstral analysis of normal and pathologic voice qualities in iranian adults: a comparative study. J Voice. 2017;31(4):508–e17–508.e23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J, Houde RA. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39(2):311–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awan SN, Roy N. Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia. J Voice. 2005;19(2):268–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Solomon NP, Helou LB, et al. Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(1):40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotby MN. Voice disorders: recent diagnostic advances, new dimensions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;11:337–340.
   Google Scholar
• Amir O, Wolf M, Amir N. A clinical comparison between two acoustic analysis softwares: MDVP and Praat. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2009;4(3):202–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, et al. Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bele IV. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality. J Voice. 2005;19(4):555–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuta T, Patrick L, Garnett JD. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. J Voice. 2004;18(3):299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollien H, Jackson B. Normative data on the speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of young adult males. J Phon. 1973;1(2):117–120.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikoff RF, Baken RJ. Consideration of the relationship between the fundamental frequency of phonation and vocal jitter. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1990;42(1):31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez J, Cervera T, Miralles JL. [Acoustic voice analysis: reliability of a set of multi-dimensional parameters]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2002;53(4):256–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Speech intensity, vocal fundamental frequency. Clinical measurements of speech and voice. 2nd ed. Albany: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta DD, Hillman RE. Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16(3):211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark RM. Frequency and voice: perspectives in the time domain. J Voice. 2006;20(3):325–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK, et al. Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006;58(4):274–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmann M, Storck C, Carding PN, et al. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(5):1152–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma EP, Yiu EM. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. J Voice. 2006;20(3):380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes LW, Cavalcante DP, Costa PO. Severity of voice disorders: integration of perceptual and acoustic data in dysphonic patients. Codas. 2014;26(5):382–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaskill CS, Awan JA, Watts CR, et al. Acoustic and perceptual classification of within-sample normal, intermittently dysphonic, and consistently dysphonic voice types. J Voice. 2017;31(2):218–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selamtzis A, Castellana A, Salvi G, et al. Effect of vowel context in cepstral and entropy analysis of pathological voices. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2019;47:350–357. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts CR, Awan SN. Use of spectral/cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from hypofunctional voices in sustained vowel and continuous speech contexts. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(6):1525–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Roy N, Dromey C. Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model. Clin Linguist Phon. 2009;23(11):825–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar