Reliability of data on percent consonants correct and its associated quality indicator in the Swedish cleft lip and palate registry

References

• Sveriges kommuner och Regioner (SKR). Nationella kvalitetsregsiter [National Quality Registries] [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 26]. Available from: https://skr.se/kvalitetsregister/omnationellakvalitetsregister.52218.html
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg C, Larson O, Milerad J. Incidence of cleft lip and palate and risks of additional malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(1):40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Persson C, Willadsen E, et al. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 4. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds – velopharyngeal competency and hypernasality. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(1):27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D, Southby L, Wren Y, et al. Centre-level variation in speech outcome and interventions, and factors associated with poor speech outcomes in 5-year-old children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: the cleft care UK study. Part 4. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20(Suppl. 2):27–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willadsen E, Lohmander A, Persson C, et al. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds – consonant proficiency and errors. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(1):38–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow AM, Lo LJ. Palatoplasty: evolution and controversies. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31(4):335–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klintö K, Karsten A, Marcusson A, et al. Coverage, reporting degree and design of the Swedish Quality Registry for patients born with cleft lip and/or palate. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Lundeborg I, Persson C. SVANTE – The Swedish Articulation And Nasality Test – normative data and a minimum standard set for cross-linguistic comparison. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(2):137–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klintö K, Salameh EK, Lohmander A. Phonology in Swedish-speaking 5-year-olds born with unilateral cleft lip and palate and the relationship with consonant production at 3 years of age. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;18(2):147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod S, Harrison LJ, McCormack J. The intelligibility in context scale: validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55(2):648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allori AC, Kelley T, Meara JG, et al. A standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(5):540–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg LD, Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982;47(3):256–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman KL, Hardin MA. Phonetic and phonologic skills of two-year-olds with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(5):435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Persson C. A longitudinal study of speech production in Swedish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate and two-stage palatal repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(1):32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Hegarty F, Powell K, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing parent led therapist supervised articulation therapy (PLAT) with routine intervention for children with speech disorders associated with cleft palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020;55(5):639–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Willadsen E, Persson C, et al. Methodology for speech assessment in the scandcleft project – an international randomized clinical trial on palatal surgery: experiences from a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(4):347–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;34(1):17–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John A, Sell D, Sweeney T, et al. The cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(3):272–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding A, Grunwell P. Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33(3):329–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutters B, Brøndsted K. Strategies in cleft palate speech – with special reference to Danish. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:126–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander A, Olsson M. Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(1):64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;40(2):103–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucchiarini C. Assessing transcription agreement: methodological aspects. Clin Linguist Phon. 1996;10(2):131–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegård K, Hagberg E, Havstam C, et al. Reliability of speech variables and speech-related quality indicators in the Swedish cleft lip and palate registry. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(6):715–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveriges kommuner och Regioner (SKR). Vården i siffror [care in numbers]; 2021 [Internet] [cited 2021 Oct 26]. Available from: https://vardenisiffror.se/
   Google Scholar
• The International Phonetic Association. The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 2015). extIPA symbols for disordered speech (revised to 2008). 2008; 2015 [Internet] [cited 2021 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/ipa-chart
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. The precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(5):695–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell D, Sweeney T. Percent consonant correct as an outcome measure for cleft speech in an intervention study. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(2):143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A. Surgical intervention and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate. In: Howard S, Lohmander A, editors. Cleft palate speech: assessment and intervention. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Registercentrum Syd. Handbok för utveckling av kvalitetsregister [Guide for the development of quality registries]. 3rd ed. Karlskrona: Registercentrum Syd – Eyenet Sweden; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons KJ, Copley LP, Deacon SA, et al. Hospital care of children with a cleft in England. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(12):970–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons KJ, Copley LP, Van der Meulen JH, et al. Grommet surgery in children with orofacial clefts in England. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell M, Medina J, Fitzsimons K, et al. The relationship between maxillary growth and speech in children with a unilateral cleft lip and palate at 5 years of age. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;59(4):453–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norsk register for leppe-kjeve-ganespalte. Årsrapport 2020 [annual report 2020]. Norwegian; 2021 [Internet] [cited 2022 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/register/barn-andre/norsk-kvalitetsregister-leppe-kjeve-ganespalte
   Google Scholar