An investigation of the cutoff point of the English version of speech handicap index in the American total laryngectomees

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan JY. Practice of laryngectomy rehabilitation interventions: a perspective from Hong Kong. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(3):205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers SN, Ahad SA, Murphy AP. A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on ‘quality of life' in head and neck cancer: 2000-2005. Oral Oncol. 2007;43(9):843–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Kuik DJ, De Bodt M, et al. Validation of the voice handicap index by assessing equivalence of european translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(4):173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carding PN, Horsley IA, Docherty GJ. A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of 45 patients with nonorganic dysphonia. J Voice. 1999;13(1):72–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanatas AN, Rogers SN. A guide of the questionnaires used in the measurement of health-related quality of life in head and neck oncology. Tumori. 2008;94(5):724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie TL, Otero D, Cox S, et al. The relationship between communicative participation and postlaryngectomy speech outcomes. Head Neck. 2016;38(S1):E1955–E1961.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eadie TL, Lamvik K, Baylor CR, et al. Communicative participation and quality of life in head and neck cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;123(4):257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):1008–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List MA, D'Antonio LL, Cella DF, et al. The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer Therapy-Head and neck scale. A study of utility and validity. Cancer. 1996;77(11):2294–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993;15(6):485–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood GW. Development and assessment of a scale addressing communication needs of patients with laryngectomies. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1993;2(3):82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index‐10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1549–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliklich RE, Glovsky RM, Montgomery WW. Validation of a voice outcome survey for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120(2):153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, et al. Vocal fatigue index (VFI): development and validation. J Voice. 2015;29(4):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, et al. Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2009;23(3):353–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ. 2001;322(7297):1297–1300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan HF, Ng ML, Rosen CA, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of speech handicap index: a scoping review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(2):748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook I. The laryngectomee guide. Charleston: CreateSpace Publication; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair CF, Carroll WR, Desmond RA, et al. Functional and survival outcomes in patients undergoing total glossectomy compared with total laryngoglossectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(5):755–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ng ML. Formant characteristics of vowels produced by mandarin esophageal speakers. J Voice. 2009;23(2):255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng ML, Wong J. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of cantonese. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52(3):780–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett JM. The acoustics of speech communication: fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi RC, Kazi RA, Agrawal N, et al. Evaluation of speech outcomes following treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35(5):417–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzanowski WJ, Hand DJ. ROC curves for continuous data. CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mozzanica F, et al. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the speech handicap index. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;43(9):1307–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. 1982. p. 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309(6947):102–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratloo A, Safari S, Elfil M, et al. Evidence based emergency medicine part 3: positive and negative likelihood ratios of diagnostic tests. Emerg. 2015;3(4):170–171. ),
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):646–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi RC, St.Rose S, Roe JWG, et al. First report on the reliability and validity of speech handicap index in native english-speaking patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2010;33(3):341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van Reij EJ, et al. Speech handicap index in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer: better understanding of patients' complaints. Head Neck. 2008;30(7):868–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degroote G, Simon J, Borel S, et al. The french version of speech handicap index: validation and comparison with the voice handicap index. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(1):20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SS, Choi SH, Hong JA, et al. Validity and reliability of the korean version of the speech handicap index in patients with oral cavity cancer. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;45(4):433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Ma L, Mao C. The validation and reliability of the chinese version of the speech handicap index for patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Journal of Voice. 2016;30(2):247. e23-247–e31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribuisiene R, Liutkevicius V, Pribuisis K, et al. Validation of the Lithuanian version of the speech handicap index. Journal of Voice. 2018;32(3):385. e1-385–e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães I, Sousa AR, Gonçalves MF. Speech handicap index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation in european portuguese speakers with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2021;46(1):11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–635.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Jaeschke R. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1043–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal I. Defining an optimal cut-point value in ROC analysis: an alternative approach. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:3762651. 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut S, Aydinli FE, Kuşçu O, et al. Reliability and validity of the turkish reflux symptom index. Journal of Voice. 2020;34(6):965. e23-965–e28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar