Early and long-term prognosis in patients with remaining chronic total occlusions after revascularization attempt. A cohort study from the SKEJ-CTO registry

References

• DALYs GBD, Collaborators H. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1260–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Dangas GD, et al. Contemporary overview and clinical perspectives of chronic total occlusions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(8):458–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramunddal T, Hoebers LP, Henriques JP, et al. Prognostic impact of chronic total occlusions: a report from SCAAR (Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(15):1535–1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(26):2484–2493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramunddal T, Hoebers LP, Henriques JP, et al. Chronic total occlusions in Sweden–a report from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry (SCAAR). PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakopoulos GE, Christopoulos G, Carlino M, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(10):1367–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, et al. Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(1):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM, et al. Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion. Circulation. 2019;139(14):1674–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Werner GS, Boukhris M, et al. Percutaneous recanalisation of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(2):198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (national cardiovascular data registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S, et al. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(10):e006229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Maeng M, Madsen M, et al. The Western Denmark heart registry: its influence on cardiovascular patient care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11):1259–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybarra LF, Rinfret S, Brilakis ES, et al. Definitions and clinical trial design principles for coronary artery chronic total occlusion therapies: CTO-ARC consensus recommendations. Circulation. 2021;143(5):479–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126(16):2020–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (SCAI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemesle G, Delhaye C, Bonello L, et al. Stent thrombosis in 2008: definition, predictors, prognosis and treatment. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101(11–12):769–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (multicenter CTO registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(2):128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Hochadel M, Zeymer U, et al. Contemporary success and complication rates of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the ALKK quality control registry of 2006. EuroIntervention. 2010;6(3):361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigger J, Hanratty CG, Walsh SJ. Common and uncommon CTO complications. Interv Cardiol. 2018;13(3):121–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claessen BE, Dangas GD, Weisz G, et al. Prognostic impact of a chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3-year results from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(6):768–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher SP, Kockx M, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Ischaemic burden and changes in absolute myocardial perfusion after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(6):e462–e471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybarra LF, Rinfret S. Why and how should we treat chronic total occlusion? Evolution of state-of-the-art methods and future directions. Can J Cardiol. 2020;2022:38(10S1):S42-S53.
   Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(14):1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapontis J, Hirai T, Patterson C, et al. Intermediate procedural and health status outcomes and the clinical care pathways after chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report from the OPEN-CTO (outcomes, patient health status, and efficiency in chronic total occlusion hybrid procedures) study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;10(15):1523–1534.
   Google Scholar