Segmental myocardial viability by echocardiography at rest

References

• Allman KC. Noninvasive assessment myocardial viability: current status and future directions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013; 20(4):618–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altiok E, Tiemann S, Becker M, et al. Myocardial deformation imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for prediction of global and segmental functional changes after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27(3):249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjesdal O, Helle-Valle T, Hopp E, et al. Noninvasive separation of large, medium, and small myocardial infarcts in survivors of reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive tissue doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; Nov1(3):189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollema SA, Delgado V, Bertini M, et al. Viability assessment with global left ventricular longitudinal strain predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(1):15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimdal A, Stoylen A, Torp H, et al. Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998; 11(11):1013–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K, et al. Strain rate imaging by ultrasound in the diagnosis of regional dysfunction of the left ventricle. Echocardiography. 1999;16(4):321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K, et al. Strain rate imaging by ultrasonography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13(12):1053–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohs LN, Trahey GE. A novel method for angle independent ultrasonic imaging of blood flow and tissue motion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38(3):280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modesto KM, Cauduro S, Dispenzieri A, et al. Two-dimensional acoustic pattern derived strain parameters closely correlate with one-dimensional tissue doppler derived strain measurements. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7(4):315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant R, Wiggers CJ. The effect OF coronary occlusion ON myocardial contraction. Washington: American Journal of Physiology; 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Ingul CB, Stoylen A, Slordahl SA. Recovery of stunned myocardium in acute myocardial infarction quantified by strain rate imaging: a clinical study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18(5):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyseggen E, Skulstad H, Helle-Valle T, et al. Myocardial strain analysis in acute coronary occlusion: a tool to assess myocardial viability and reperfusion. Circulation. 2005; 20112(25):3901–3910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skulstad H, Edvardsen T, Urheim S, et al. Postsystolic shortening in ischemic myocardium: active contraction or passive recoil? Circulation. 2002;106(6):718–724. 6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celutkiene J, Sutherland GR, Laucevicius A, et al. Is post-systolic motion the optimal ultrasound parameter to detect induced ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J. 2004;25(11):932–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukulski T, Jamal F, Herbots L, et al. Identification of acutely ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements. A clinical study in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(5):810–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt JU, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, et al. Strain-rate imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography provides objective evidence of inducible ischemia. Circulation. 2003; 29107(16):2120–2126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eek C, Grenne B, Brunvand H, et al. Postsystolic shortening is a strong predictor of recovery of systolic function in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(7):483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosokawa H, Sheehan FH, Suzuki T. Measurement of postsystolic shortening to assess viability and predict recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(7):1842–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JK, Song JM, Kang DH, et al. Postsystolic thickening detected by doppler myocardial imaging: a marker of viability or ischemia in patients with myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2004; 27(1):29–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HS, Kang SJ, Song JK, et al. Diagnosis of viable myocardium using velocity data of doppler myocardial imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(9):933–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom L, Jenkins C, Jeffries L, et al. Incremental value of strain rate analysis as an adjunct to wall-motion scoring for assessment of myocardial viability by dobutamine echocardiography: a follow-up study after revascularization. Circulation. 2005;112(25):3892–3900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim P, Pasquet A, Gerber B, et al. Is postsystolic shortening a marker of viability in chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction? Comparison with late enhancement contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21(5):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents [conference paper]. Circulation. 2010;121(22):2462–2508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner T, Bogaert J, Friedrich MG, SCMR Position Paper, et al. On clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020;22(1):76. 2020 2020/11/09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstensen A, Amundsen BH, Dalen H, et al. Strain rate imaging combined with wall motion analysis gives incremental value in direct quantification of myocardial infarct size. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(11):914–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39 e14. Jan
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainin P, Hoffmann S, Fritz-Hansen T, et al. Usefulness of postsystolic shortening to diagnose coronary artery disease and predict future cardiovascular events in stable angina pectoris. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(8):870–879 e3. Aug
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt JU, Lindenmeier G, Exner B, et al. Incidence and characteristics of segmental postsystolic longitudinal shortening in normal, acutely ischemic, and scarred myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16(5):415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(20):1445–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Kappl MJ, Linke A, et al. Influence of time-to-treatment, TIMI-flow grades, and ST-segment resolution on infarct size and infarct transmurality as assessed by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(12):1433–1439. Jun
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, et al. Wall motion score index and ejection fraction for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;151(2):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal M, Jeffriess L, Leano R, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eek C, Grenne B, Brunvand H, et al. Strain echocardiography and wall motion score index predicts final infarct size in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asanuma T, Nakatani S. Myocardial ischaemia and post-systolic shortening. Heart. 2015; 101(7):509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingul CB, Malm S, Refsdal E, et al. Recovery of function after acute myocardial infarction evaluated by tissue Doppler strain and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(4):432–438. Apr
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claus P, Weidemann F, Dommke C, et al. Mechanisms of postsystolic thickening in ischemic myocardium: mathematical modelling and comparison with experimental ischemic substrates. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(12):1963–1970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutsaert DL, Rademakers FE, Sys SU. Triple control of relaxation: implications in cardiac disease. Circulation. 1984;69(1):190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidemann F, Dommke C, Bijnens B, et al. Defining the transmurality of a chronic myocardial infarction by ultrasonic strain-rate imaging: implications for identifying intramural viability: an experimental study. Circulation. 2003; 107(6):883–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkelsen CJ, Poulsen SH, Norgaard BL, et al. Does postsystolic motion or shortening predict recovery of myocardial function after primary percutanous coronary intervention? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007; May20(5):505–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainin P, Haahr-Pedersen S, Sengelov M, et al. Presence of post-systolic shortening is an independent predictor of heart failure in patients following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 34(5):751–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainin P, Biering-Sørensen SR, Møgelvang R, et al. Post-systolic shortening: normal values and association with validated echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(2):327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt JU, Nixdorff U, Bogdan R, et al. Comparison of deformation imaging and velocity imaging for detecting regional inducible ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(17):1517–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah BN, Khattar RS, Senior R. The hibernating myocardium: current concepts, diagnostic dilemmas, and clinical challenges in the post-STICH era. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(18):1323–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engblom H, Tufvesson J, Jablonowski R, et al. A new automatic algorithm for quantification of myocardial infarction imaged by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: experimental validation and comparison to expert delineations in multi-center, multi-vendor patient data. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016; 18(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolli R. Basic and clinical aspects of myocardial stunning. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;40(6):477–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidemann F, Wacker C, Rauch A, et al. Sequential changes of myocardial function during acute myocardial infarction, in the early and chronic phase after coronary intervention described by ultrasonic strain rate imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006; 19(7):839–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripa RS, Nilsson JC, Wang Y, et al. Short- and long-term changes in myocardial function, morphology, edema, and infarct mass after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction evaluated by serial magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J. 2007;154(5):929–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson M, Ubachs JFA, Hedström E, et al. Myocardium at risk After acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2(5):569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar