On the Land Value Capture: Politics of Land Use in the Global North and South

References

• Agamben, G. 2002. Homo Sacer: o poder soberano e a vida nua, Translated by Henrique Burigo. Belo Horizonte: UFMH.
   Google Scholar
• Agyemang, F. S. K., and N. Morrison. 2018. “Recognising the Barriers to Securing Affordable Housing Through the Land Use Planning System in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Perspective from Ghana.” Urban Studies 55 (12): 2640–2659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017724092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. 2022. “On Planning, Planning Theories, and Practices: A Critical Reflection.” Planning Theory 147309522110663. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952211066341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANANYA, R. O. Y. 2011. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. 1988. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aveline-Dubach, N., and G. Blandeau. 2019. “The Political Economy of Transit Value Capture: The Changing Business Model of the MTRC in Hong Kong.” Urban Studies 56 (16): 3415–3431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018821519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, H. X. H., J. P. Larsson, and V. Wong. 2021. “Light at the End of the Tunnel: The Impacts of Expected Major Transport Improvements on Residential Property Prices.” Urban Studies 58 (14): 2971–2990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020967308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by K. Schatzki. K. Cetina and E. von Savigny, 25–37. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. 2012. “What Theorists Do.” Urban Geography 33 (4): 474–487. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrisford, S., L. R. Cirolia, and I. Palmer. 2018. “Land-Based Financing in Sub-Saharan African Cities.” Environment and Urbanization 30 (1): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817753525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggar, J., and A. Friendly. 2022. “Balancing Equity-Based Goals with Market-Driven Forces in Land Development: The Case of Density Bonusing in Toronto.” Environment & Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221087243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1975. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason.” Social Science Information 14 (6): 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Les usages sociaux de la science - Pour une sociologie clinique du champ scientifique. Paris: Éditions Quæ.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2009. “What is Critical Urban Theory?” City 13 (2–3): 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902996466.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2014. “The ‘Urban Age’ in Question.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 38 (3): 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. “Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?” City 19 (2–3): 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City 19 (2–3): 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns-Berentelg, J., L. Noring, and A. Grydehøj. 2022. “Developing Urban Growth and Urban Quality: Entrepreneurial Governance and Urban Redevelopment Projects in Copenhagen and Hamburg.” Urban Studies 59 (1): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020951438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera-Rivera, A., W. Ochoa, F. Larrinaga, and G. Lasa. 2022. “How-To Conduct a Systematic Literature Review: A Quick Guide for Computer Science Research.” MethodsX 9:101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catney, P., and J. Henneberry. 2019. “Change in the Political Economy of Land Value Capture in England.” The Town Planning Review 90 (4): 339–358. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2019.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., K. W. Chau, and L. Yang. 2022. “How the combined use of non-negotiable and negotiable developer obligations affects land value capture: Evidence from market-oriented urban redevelopment in China.” Habitat International 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E., H. Gutzon Larsen, and A. Lund Hansen. 2015. Financialisation of built environments: A literature review. In Working Paper Series. Lund: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies.
   Google Scholar
• David, M., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4): 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2015. “Planning as Practice of Knowing.” Planning Theory 14 (3): 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., and D. Marsh. 2012. “The Future of Policy Transfer Research.” Political Studies Review 10 (3): 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyca, B., K. Muldoon-Smith, and P. Greenhalgh. 2020. “Common Value: Transferring Development Rights to Make Room for Water.” Environmental Science & Policy 114:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., and J. Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `epistemic Objects’.” Organization Studies 30 (1): 07–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608083014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, L. A. 2022. ““Tax Discrimination District”: The Intersection of Race and Transit Value Capture.” Journal of the American Planning Association 88 (3): 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1987968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1980. “Critical Theory and Planning Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association 46 (3): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368008977043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourez, G. 1992. La construction des sciences: introduction à la philosophie et à l’éthique des sciences. 2nd ed. Bruxelles: De Bœck Universitè.
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, A. 2020. “Sharing the Unearned Increment: Divergent Outcomes in Toronto and São Paulo.” Land Use Policy 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, F., and S. MO. 2001. “Recuperación de plusvalías en Latinoamérica: ¿bravura o bravata?” In Recuperación de Plusvalías en América Latina: alternativas para el desarrollo urbano, edited by F. Furtado and M. Smolka, XIII–XLI. Santiago: Eure Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Garza, N., and I. Gonzalez. 2021. “An Urban System Assessment of Land Value Capture: The Colombian Case.” Land Use Policy 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza, N., and C. Lizieri. 2016. “A Spatial-Temporal Assessment of the Land Value Development Tax.” Land Use Policy 50:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, H. 1879. Progress and poverty: An inquiry into the cause of industrial depressions and of increase of want with increase of wealth. New York: Doubleday. https://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/George/grgPP.html?chapter_num=29#book-reader.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 2013. “Cracking Hegemony: Gramsci and the Dialectics of Rebellion.” In Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics, edited by M. Ekers, G. Hart, S. Kipfer, and A. Loftus, 241–257. London: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M., and D. Narayan. 2021. “Through the Optics of Finance: Speculative Urbanism and the Transformation of Markets.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 45 (2): 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, T. 2017. “Taxing Property in a Neo-Developmental State: The Politics of Urban Land Value Capture in Rwanda and Ethiopia.” African Affairs 116 (465): 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottdiener, M. 1994. The Social Production of Urban Space. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2002. Splintering Urbanism - Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, L. A., H. D. Enríquez, and P. Hessel. 2021. “BRT System in Bogotá and Urban Effects: More Residential Land Premiums?” Research in Transportation Economics 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2006. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Georgrafiska Annaler Series B 71 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2002. Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2016. Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2010. “The Transnational Flow of Knowledge and Expertise in the Planning Field.” In Crossing Borders : International Exchange and Planning Practices, edited by P. Healey and R. Upton, 1–26. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and R. Upton. 2010. Crossing Borders : International Exchange and Planning Practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. B., and T. Maria Almeida. 2007. “Impact of Proximity to Light Rail Rapid Transit on Station-Area Property Values in Buffalo, New York.” Urban Studies 44 (5–6): 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701256005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2017. “Lines of Becoming.” In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, and V. Watson, 337–350. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1970. “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding.” World Politics 22 (3): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. 2017. “Neo-Pragmatist Planning Theory.” In Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, 118–129. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., and O. Yiftachel. 2000. “New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education & Research 19 (4): 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x0001900402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, S. 2010. “Reflexiones sobre la “informalidad” fundiaria como peculiaridad de los mercados del suelo en las ciudades de América Latina.“ Territorios. AccessedFebruary 01, 2023. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/territorios/article/view/826.
   Google Scholar
• Jillella, S. S. K., A. Matan, and P. Newman. 2015. “Participatory Sustainability Approach to Value Capture-Based Urban Rail Financing in India Through Deliberated Stakeholder Engagement.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 7 (7): 8091–8115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 2006. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
   Google Scholar
• Law-Yone, H. 2007. “Another Planning Theory? Rewriting the Meta-Narrative.” Planning Theory 6 (3): 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207082038.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., and P. E. D. Love. 2022. “Procuring Urban Rail Transit Infrastructure by Integrating Land Value Capture and Public-Private Partnerships: Learning from the Cities of Delhi and Hong Kong.” Cities 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopera, C. P., and E. López-Morales. 2020. “Principles, Progressivity and Feasibility of the Recovery of “Capital gains” Urban in Chile Today.” Revista de Geografia Norte Grande 76:121–142. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022020000200121.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A. 2014. “Towards a Non-Theoretical Understanding of Planning.” Planning Theory 13 (1): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213477642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., C. W. Cheang, and R. Dunning. 2021. “Understanding the Geography of Affordable Housing Provided Through Land Value Capture: Evidence from England.” Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021998893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, G. S., L. A. Garrow, and J. Moreno-Cruz. 2015. “Do Atlanta Residents Value MARTA? Selecting an Autoregressive Model to Recover Willingness to Pay.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 78:214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H., and L. Behrend. 2022. “Planning and Knowledge – How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities.” Planning Theory & Practice 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.2020032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H., P. Olsson, T.-R. Lappi, and K. Ojanen. 2021. “Ethnographic Knowledge in Urban Planning – Bridging the Gap Between the Theories of Knowledge-Based and Communicative Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1993316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, P. 2017. “The Calculative Turn in Land Value Capture: Lessons from the English Planning System.” Land Use Policy 63:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J., and K. Chatiza. 2019. “Frontiers of Urban Control: Lawlessness on the City Edge and Forms of Clientalist Statecraft in Zimbabwe.” Antipode 51 (5): 1554–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., P. Newman, R. Trubka, and J. Kenworthy. 2017. “Framework for land value capture from investments in transit in car-dependent cities.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 10 (1): 155–185. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medda, F. 2012. “Land Value Capture Finance for Transport Accessibility: A Review.” Journal of Transport Geography 25:154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2017. “Postpolitics and Planning.” In Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, 180–193. London: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, S., and A. J. Scott. 2016. “Current Debates in Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment.” Urban Studies 53 (6): 1114–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016634002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and J. Virkkunen. 2005. “Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change.” Organization 12 (3): 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, S. I., D. J. Graham, P. C. Melo, and R. J. Anderson. 2013. “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Rail Projects on Land and Property Values.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 50:158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mulley, C., L. Ma, G. Clifton, B. Yen, and M. Burke. 2016. “Residential Property Value Impacts of Proximity to Transport Infrastructure: An Investigation of Bus Rapid Transit and Heavy Rail Networks in Brisbane, Australia.” Journal of Transport Geography 54:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P. 2020. “A precariedade como regra: aportes para um reposicionamento epistemológico.” Revista V!RUS 20:1–9. http://www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus20/?sec=4&item=3&lang=pt.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P. 2021a. “Brazilian-Style Financialization: CEPACs and the Desire to Be Prime.” V!RUS 23:1–11. http://www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus23/?sec=4&item=1&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P. 2021b. Gestão de políticas públicas: conceitos, aportes teóricos e modelos analíticos. Curitiba: Intersaberes.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., D. Follador, Z. Schussel, and T. Moreira. 2016. “Políticas públicas, democracia e eficiência: diferentes protagonista de um mesmo enredo.” Cuadernos de Vivienda y Urbanismo 9 (17): 68–89.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., and T. Moreira. 2017. “Metropolitan Dimension of Social Housing Policy.” Mercator 16 (11): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4215/rm2017.e16027.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., and T. Moreira. 2022. “Between Formal Intersections and Functional Distensions - Urban Operations and Financialization on the Periphery of Capitalism.” CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios 44:133–153. https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.25700.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., T. Moreira, C. Hardt, and Z. Schussel. 2015. “Análise de políticas públicas: entre a modelagem e a realidade da política habitacional brasileira.” Revista de Administração Pública 49 (4): 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612132489.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., and M. Procopiuck. 2022. “COVID19 in Latin America: Informal Settlements and the Politics of Urbicide.” GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10765-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento Neto, P., and L. Salinas Arreortua. 2020. “Financialization of Housing Policies in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective of Brazil and Mexico.” Housing Studies 35 (10): 1633–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1680815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzau, B., and C. Trillo. 2020. “Affordable Housing Provision in Informal Settlements Through Land Value Capture and Inclusionary Housing.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 12 (15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155975.
   Google Scholar
• Nzau, B., and C. Trillo. 2021. “Harnessing the Real Estate Market for Equitable Affordable Housing Provision: Insights from the City of Santa Monica, California.” Housing Studies 36 (7): 1086–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1746244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeng-Odoom, F. 2019. “The Intellectual Marginalisation of Africa.” African Identities 17 (3–4): 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2019.1667223.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D., and T. A. Reiner. 1962. “A Choice Theory of Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28 (2): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366208979427.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., and J. T. Miao. 2020. “The Entrepreneurial Lie of the Land.” Dialogues in Human Geography 10 (3): 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620921033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H. J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., P. Harrison, J. Shen, and F. Wu. 2021. “Financing Urban Development, Three Business Models: Johannesburg, Shanghai and London.” Progress in Planning 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 2001. “Two Concepts of Practices.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by R. Theodore. K. Schatzki. K. Cetina, E. von Savigny, 189–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. “The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory.” Regional Studies 43 (6): 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2010. “Poverty truths: The Politics of Knowledge in the New Global Order of Development.” In Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices, edited by P. Healey and R. Upton, 27–46. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2011. “Urbanisms, Worlding Practices and the Theory of Planning.” Planning Theory 10 (1): 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210386065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2016. “What is Urban About Critical Urban Theory?” Urban Geography 37 (6): 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaj, A. T., A. Roumboutsos, P. Verlič, and B. Grum. 2018. “Land Value Capture Strategies in PPP – What Can FM Learn from It?” Facilities 36 (1–2): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2017-0033.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2001. “Practice-Mind-Ed Order.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by K. Schatzki, K. Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 50–63. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schussel, Z., and P. Nascimento Neto. 2015. “GESTÃO POR BACIAS HIDROGRÁFICAS: DO DEBATE TEÓRICO À GESTÃO MUNICIPAL.” Ambiente & Sociedade 18 (3): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc838v1832015.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre, G., and G. Jajamovich. 2020. “The Role of Mobile Policies in Coalition Building: The Barcelona Model as Coalition Magnet in Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro (1989–1996).” Urban Studies 58 (11): 004209802093980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020939808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 2004. “Ideology, Science and Social Relations: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Epistemology.” European Journal of Social Theory 7 (4): 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431004046702.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E. 2010. “Empirical Urban Theory for Archaeologists.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 18 (3): 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9097-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, M. 2013. Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., H. Shin, and S. Hoon Park. 2017. “A Mega Urban Project and Two Competing Accumulation Strategies: Negotiating Discourses of the Songdo International Business District Development.” International Development Planning Review 39 (3): 299–317. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2017.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, M. L. D. 2002. Mudar a cidade: Uma introdução crítica ao planejamento e à gestão urbanos: Uma introdução crítica ao planejamento e à gestão urbanos. São Paulo: Bertrand Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2004. “Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the ‘Transnationalization’ of Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (3): 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760410001694291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. C., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. The Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and B. Glaser. 1967. The Discovey of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., T. Chen, Z. Cheng, C. C. Wang, and X. Ning. 2017. “A Financing Mode of Urban Rail Transit Based on Land Value Capture: A Case Study in Wuhan City.” Transport Policy 57:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, H., J. Murakami, H. YH, and B. Tamayose. 2015. Financing Transit-Oriented Development with Land Values - Adapting Land Value Capture in Developing Countries. Washington: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Vejchodská, E., A. P. Barreira, A. Auziņš, E. Jürgenson, S. Fowles, and V. Maliene. 2022. “Bridging Land Value Capture with Land Rent Narratives.” Land Use Policy 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, M., E. N. Van, and L. Waltman. 2021. “Large-Scale Comparison of Bibliographic Data Sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.” Quantitative Science Studies 2 (1): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. A., and E. Frimpong Boamah. 2019. “Making the Invisible Hyper-Visible: Knowledge Production and the Gendered Power Nexus in Critical Urban Studies.” Human Geography 12 (2): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861901200203.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. 2022. “Rethinking Local Government Perceptions of Land Value Capture in Land Marketization: The Lens of Dominant Consideration(s) in Interest-Balancing Acts.” Cities 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., F. van Noorloos, and T. Spit. 2020. “Stakeholder Power Relations in Land Value Capture: Comparing Public (China) and Private (U.S.) Dominant Regimes.” Land Use Policy 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. 2021. “Land Financialisation, Planning Informalisation and Gentrification as Statecraft in Antwerp.” Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211028235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2009. “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues.” Urban Studies 46 (11): 2259–2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. 2021. “Embedding Futurity in Urban Governance: Redevelopment Schemes and the Time Value of Money.” Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space 53 (3): 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20936686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzstein, S. 2017. The global urban housing affordability crisis. Urban Studies 54 (14): 3159–3177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017711649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, P. 2017. “Experiences of Running Negotiable and Non-Negotiable Developer Contributions Side-By-Side.” Planning Practice & Research 32 (2): 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1222148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z. J., K. Vardhan Das, and K. Larson. 2012. “Joint Development as a Value Capture Strategy in Transportation Finance.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 5 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v5i1.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, H., and L. Wei. 2016. “Rail Transit Investment and Property Values: An Old Tale Retold.” Transport Policy 51:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar