References
- Natvig B NI, Bruusgaard D, Rutle O. Musculoskeletal complaints in a population. Occurrence and localization. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1994; 114: 323–7
- Picavet HSJ. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: Prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 2003; 102: 167–78
- Kohlmann T. Musculoskeletal pain in the population. Schmerz 2003; 17: 405–11
- Walker B. The prevalence of low back pain: Systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Dis 2000; 13: 205–17
- Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 2004
- Kohlmann T, Raspe H. [Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996;35:I–VIII.
- Jette AM, Delitto A. Physical therapy treatment choices for musculoskeletal impairments. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 145–54
- Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271–3
- Harding VR, Williams AC, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 1994; 58: 367–75
- Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2412–21
- Strand LI, Moe-Nilssen R, Ljunggren AE. Back Performance Scale for the assessment of mobility-related activities in people with back pain. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1213–23
- Magnussen L, Strand LI, Lygren H. Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: Observing activity limitation in patients with back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 903–7
- Strand LI, Wie SL. The Sock Test for evaluating activity limitation in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 136–45
- Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders WBC; 1994. p. 191–6.
- Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: The normal distribution. BMJ 1995; 310: 298
- Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Haldorsen EM, Espehaug B. The impact of physical function and pain on work status at 1-year follow-up in patients with back pain. Spine 2001; 26: 800–8
- McColl EC T, Kønig-Zahn C. Making the right choice of outcome measure. Cross cultural health outcome assessment; a user's guide: ERGHO European Research Group on Health Outcome, A Hutchinson, N Bentzen, C Konig-Zahn, 1996; 12–26
- Moll JM, Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis 1971; 30: 381–6
- Gronblad M, Hurri H, Kouri JP. Relationships between spinal mobility, physical performance tests, pain intensity and disability assessments in chronic low back pain patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 17–24
- Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara M, Soukka A, Harju R. Flexibility of the spine: Normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 147–54
- McGregor AH, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP. Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population. Spine 1995; 20: 2421–8
- Thomas E, Silman AJ, Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Croft PR. Association between measures of spinal mobility and low back pain. An analysis of new attenders in primary care. Spine 1998; 23: 343–7
- Battiè MC. The reliability of physical factors as predictors of the occurrence of back pain reports [Doctoral dissertation]. Gothenburg University, Gothenborg 1989
- Domholdt E. Physical therapy research. Principles and applications. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 2005