References
- Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3419–25.
- Matsumoto T, Kaneuji A, Hiejima Y, Sugiyama H, Akiyama H, Atsumi T, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ): a patient-based evaluation tool for the hip-joint disease. The Subcommittee on Hip Disease Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17(1):25–38.
- Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, Basch E, Potosky AL, Roberts AC, et al. Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):e215–22.
- Shervin N, Dorrwachter J, Bragdon CR, Shervin D, Zurakowski D, Malchau H. Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(3):285–93.
- Marsh JD, Bryant DM, Macdonald SJ, Naudie DD. Patients respond similarly to paper and electronic versions of the WOMAC and SF-12 following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(4):670–3.
- Takegami Y, Seki T, Kaneuji A, Nakao A, Hasegawa Y, Ishiguro N. Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016;78:237–44.
- Saghaei M, Saghaei S. Implementation of an open-source customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials. JBiSE. 2011;04:734–9.
- Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, Theiler R. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touchscreen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):80–4.
- Seki T, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y, Ikeuchi K, Hiejima Y. Reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) for patients with hip disease. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(5):782–7.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.
- Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale Ø, Aanerud GJ, et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(10):1480–4.
- Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C, Bredle DL. Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1572–8.
- Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(3):452.
- Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health. 2008;11(2):322–33.
- Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(11):1086–90.
- Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356–61.
- Marquié JC, Jourdan-Boddaert L, Huet N. Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behav Inf Technol. 2002;21(4):273–80.
- Igbaria M, Chakrabarti A. Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use. Behav Inf Technol. 1990;9(3):229–41.