Outcome sequences and illusion of control - Part I: An online replication of Langer & Roth (1975)

References

• Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2022). Langer’s illusion of control and the cognitive model of disordered gambling. Addiction, 117(4), 1146–1151. doi:10.1111/add.15649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., & Norman, A. C. (1998). Arousal, erroneous verbalizations and the illusion of control during a computer-generated gambling task. British Journal of Psychology, 89(4), 629–645. , from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02707.x
   Google Scholar
• Cyders, M. A., Littlefield, A. K., Coffey, S., & Karyadi, K. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39(9), 1372–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191 .http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. L., & Smith, C. (1989). Illusion of control and gambling in children. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(2), 127–136. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019759
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E., Jr. (2020). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous [Computer software manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc (R package version 4.4-2)
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. K., & Kahana, M. J. (2014). Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heirene, R. M. (2021). A call for replications of addiction research: Which studies should we replicate and what constitutes a ‘successful’replication? Addiction Research & Theory, 29(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2020.1751130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højsgaard, S., & Halekoh, U. (2020). Doby: Groupwise statistics, lsmeans, linear contrasts, utilities [Computer software manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=doBy ( R package version 4.6.8)
   Google Scholar
• Hope, R. M. (2013). Rmisc: Ryan miscellaneous [Computer software manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc ( R package version 1.5)
   Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.2)[computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Ladouceur, R., & Mayrand, M. (1984). Evaluation of the “Illusion of control”: Type of feedback, outcome sequence, and number of trials among regular and occasional gamblers. The Journal of Psychology. 117(1), 37–46. . https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1984.9923656
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 951–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante, D. A. (2019). Replication is fundamental, but is it common? A call for scientific self-reflection and contemporary research practices in gambling-related research. International Gambling Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2019.1672768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments [Computer software manual]. ( R package version 4.4-0) http://github.com/mike-lawrence/ez
   Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.Ac—a subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99(6), 757–769. , http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00753.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. ( tex.organization:R Foundation for Statistical Computing) https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reallusion Inc. (n.d.) Crazytalk. Reallusion Inc. https://www.reallusion.com/crazytalk/
   Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive–behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00087-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan, S., & David, D. (2013). Recent developments in the experimental investigation of the illusion of control. A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R. … Gronau, Q.F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E.-J., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., de Jong, T. . Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2007a). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2007b). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G. … Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K. Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., Tabri, N., & Zelenski, J. M. (2019). The need for open science practices and well-conducted replications in the field of gambling studies. International Gambling Studies, 19(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2019.1672769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar