How new venture strategies promote firm performance: an optimal distinctiveness perspective

References

• Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2020). Political connection and disconnection: Still a success factor for Chinese entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719893110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.77.12570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<147::AID-SMJ11>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S. (2006). Strategic decision‐making: Process perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Lant, T. K., & Schildt, H. A. (2019). Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of Silicon Alley. Innovation: Organization and Management, 21(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1465822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenstein, J., Hunoldt, M., & Oertel, S. (2019). How optimal distinctiveness affects new ventures’ failure risk: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haans, R. F. (2019). What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management Journal, 40(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Schmitt, J. (2010). Brand awareness in business markets: When is it related to firm performance? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J., Lahneman, B., & Parmigiani, A. (2018). Nested identities as cognitive drivers of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. E., Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Novelty and new firm performance: The case of employment systems in knowledge-intensive service organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Wang, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation, new product development and firm performance: The moderating role of legitimacy in Chinese high-tech SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. L., & Smith, J. R. (2006). Corporate strategy. FT/Prentice Hall Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291–335. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1014661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, B., & Zietsma, C. (2018). Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Breton-Miller, I. L., & Lester, R. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive advantage of nations: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Semadeni, M., & Anderson, B. S. (2010). The follower’s dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1175–1193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392787
   Google Scholar
• Snihur, Y., & Clarysse, B. (2022). Sowing the seeds of failure: Organizational identity dynamics in new venture pivoting. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soublière, J.-F., & Gehman, J. (2020). The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on Kickstarter. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 472–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Wright, M. (2012). The contingent value of corporate political ties. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Katz, J. A. (2014). Proactiveness, stakeholder–firm power difference, and product safety and quality of Chinese SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J. W., Tihanyi, L., Ireland, R. D., & Sirmon, D. G. (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 429–510. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40632826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. (2007). An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.4.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. Y., Ishihara, M., Jennings, P. D., & Lounsbury, M. (2018). Optimal distinctiveness in the console video game industry: An exemplar-based model of proto-category evolution. Organization Science, 29(4), 588–611. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. Y. (2022). Optimal distinctiveness: A new agenda for the study of competitive positioning of organizations and markets. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. Y., & Glynn, M. A. (2022). Optimal distinctiveness: On being the same and different. Organization Theory, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221079340
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. W. (2016). Optimal distinctiveness revisited (Vol. 183). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar