Maintaining legitimacy: an institutional cooptative analysis of a green technology innovation scheme crisis

References

• Arundela, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, G., Mallett, A., Burlica, B., Nolan-Poupart, F., & Slater, R. (2014). Evaluating the effects of policy innovations: Lessons from a systematic review of policies promoting low-carbon technology. Global Environmental Change, 29, 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, P., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, N., Pereira, J., Moreira, A. C., & De Matos, N. (2019). Exploring the meaning of social innovation: A categorisation scheme based on the level of policy intervention, profit orientation and geographical scale. Innovation: Organization & Management, 21(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1585188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2016, December 16). RHI scandal: Advisers ‘pressurized Jonathan Bell’. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-38329790
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2017, January 18). RHI scandal: Arlene Foster’s adviser ‘exerted influence’ over botched scheme. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-38663084
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2017, November 7). Timeline: Renewable heat incentive scandal. www.bbc.com:https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-38301428
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1994). The Reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfast Telegraph. (2016, December 16). https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/arlene-foster-what-she-said-about-bells-rhi-claims-bullying-and-stepping-aside-35299647.html
   Google Scholar
• Belfast Telegraph. (2017, February 7). https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/ex-moderator-slams-stormonts-lack-of-ethical-conduct-exposed-in-rhi-inquiry-38983643.html
   Google Scholar
• Bertha, M. S., Klockner, C. A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2011). Adopters and non-adopters of wood pellet heating in Norwegian households. Biomass & Bioenergy, 652–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexell, M. (2014). Global governance, legitimacy and (de)legitimation. Globalizations, 11(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.919744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “Macro” and the “Micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. The Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (1997). Narcissism, Identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.2307/259409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Caiazza, R., & Volpe, T. (2017). Innovation and its diffusion: Process, actors, and actions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1211262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenglin, M., Debin, F., Liyan, S., & Qiaoling, L. (2017, November). Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Conservation & Recycling, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., & Gordon, R. D. (2012). Accounting for ethics in action: problems with localized constructions of legitimacy. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00554.x
   Google Scholar
• Clemente, M., & Gabbioneta, C. (2017). How does the media frame corporate scandals? The case of German newspapers and the Volkswagen diesel scandal. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616689304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. (1994). Environmental performance and technological innovation: The pulp and paper industry as a case in point. Technology in Society- Science Direct, 16(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(94)90012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P. (2013). The failure of foresight in crisis management: A secondary analysis of the Mari disaster. Technological Forecasting & Social Change.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, C., & Shirlow, P. (2018). From the ‘Long War’ to the ‘Long Peace’: An introduction to the special edition. Capital & Class, 43(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816818818084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007, March). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counselling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damert, M., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2018). Intra‐sectoral differences in climate change strategies: Evidence from the global automotive industry. Business Strategy & the Environment, 27(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. C. (1996). Comparing environmental risks - Tools for setting government priorities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020). Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3352–3369. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector. A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debenedetti, A., Philippe, D., Chaney, D., & Humphreys, A. (2020). Maintaining legitimacy in contested mature markets through discursive strategies: The case of corporate environmentalism in the French automotive industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for the Economy. (2019). Department for the economy. https://www.economy-ni.gov.uk/topics/energy
   Google Scholar
• Durán-Romero, G., & Urraca-Ruiz, A. (2015). Climate change and eco-innovation. A patent data assessment of environmentally sound technologies, innovation: Management. Policy & Practice, 17(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011062
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I.-M., Martín-Moreno, J., Khan, S. A., & Hussain, N. (2020). Socio-emotional wealth and corporate responses to environmental hostility: Are family firms more stakeholder oriented? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 43(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramkow, C., & Anger-Kraavi, A. (2018). Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors. Climate Policy (Earthscan), 18(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1277683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, B. M., & Pomirleanu, N. (2021). A discursive framework of B2B brand legitimacy. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 22–31 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, C. E., & Tracey, P. (2017). How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: The case of cook’s travel agency in Victorian Britain. The Academy of Management, 60(6), 2175–2207. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0365
   Google Scholar
• Helms, W. S., Patterson, K. D. W., & Hudson, B. A. (2019). Let’s Not “Taint” With Legitimacy, Please. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (2002). Legitimacy, power, and the symbolic life of the UN security council. Global Governance, 8(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00801006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huy, Q. N., Corley, K. G., & Kraatz, M. S. (2014). From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. The Academy of Management, 57(6), 1650–1680. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0074
   Google Scholar
• Jabbouri, R., Truong, Y., Schneckenberga, D., & Palmer, M. (2019). Institutional means-ends decoupling work in industrial R&D project implementation. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14(1–2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916283X00090
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingo, E. L., & Elmes, M. B. (2019). Institutional preservation work at a family business in crisis: Micro processes, emotions, and nonfamily members. Organization Studies, 40(6), 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618818597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Yan, M. (2018). Corporate sustainability and green innovation in an emerging economy—an empirical study in China. Sustainability, 10(11) , 0–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdeke‐Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy & the Environment, 29(2), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management, 47(5) , 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, R. D., Lenny Koh, S. C., & Morris, J. C. (2015). Delivering energy efficiency and carbon reduction schemes in England: Lessons from green deal pioneer places. Energy Policy, 84, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S., & Scott, J. T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCausland, N. (2018, December 29). Why Arlene is right to call for an independent inquiry into the RHI scheme to establish facts. Belfast Telegraph. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/nelson-mccausland/why-arlene-is-right-to-call-for-an-independent-inquiry-into-the-rhi-scheme-to-establish-facts-35326613.html
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh, B., & Shirlow, P. (2011). Devolution and the politics of development in Northern Ireland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(1) , 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10216r
   Google Scholar
• Nählinder, J., & Eriksson, A. F. (2019). Outcome, process and support: Analysing aspects of innovation in public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 39(6), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1559617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• News Letter. (2019, January 8). Arlene Foster finally says sorry for DUP’s role in the RHI scandal. https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/arlene-foster-finally-says-sorry-dups-role-rhi-scandal-178139
   Google Scholar
• NIAO. (2016, July 5). Northern Ireland Audit Office. http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalassets/committee-blocks/pac/niao-reports/niao-rhi-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2016). Non-domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme. http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/assembly-business/committees/2016-2017/public-accounts/enquiries/non-domestic-renewable-heat-incentive-rhi-scheme/
   Google Scholar
• Noy, C. (2007). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4) , 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oduro, S., Maccario, G., & De Nisco, A. (2021). Green innovation: A multidomain systematic review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofgem. (2019). Ofgem. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes/
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• RHI Inquiry. Sir. Patrick Coghlin, R. H., O’Brien, D. U., & MacLean, D. K. (2020). The report of the independent public inquiry into the non-domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme. Northern Ireland: Digital Print Services of the Northern Ireland Department of Finance. www.rhiinquiry.org
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2004). Ruling out innovations – Technological regimes, rules and failures: The cases of heat pump power generation and bio-gas production in The Netherlands. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.178
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. (2011). A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roupas, P. (2008). Human and organisational factors affecting technology uptake by industry. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. M., Kin Fai, E. W., & Kwong, J. Y. (2014). The Role of Regret in Institutional Persistence and. Change Management, 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2013.866153
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning, 42(6), 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. (2018). Legitimacy deficits of international organizations: Design, drift, and decoupling at the UN security council. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1476463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge- improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven. Yale University Press. file:///C:/Users/2623069/Downloads/Richard_H._Thaler_Cass_R._Sunstein_Nudge_Improv.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. D., & Nash, J. (2009). Low carbon, high growth: Latin American responses to climate change. World Bank Publications. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.queens.ezp1.qub.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgements. Academy of Management Review, 36(4) , 686–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, W. (2010). Innovation and the value of failure. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3(1), 75–84. http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/ijmmre/ijmmr-v3n1-2010/IJMMR-V3N1-2010-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turaeva, R., & Hornidge, A. (2013). From knowledge ecology to innovation systems: Agricultural innovations and their diffusion in Uzbekistan. Management, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.183
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, L., Luederitz, C., Kundurpi, A., Mercado, A. J., Weber, O., & Burch, S. L. (2019). Conceptualizing businesses as social actors: A framework for understanding sustainability actions in small and medium sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woerter, M., Stucki, T., Arvanitis, S., Rammer, C., & Peneder, M. (2017, October 25). The adoption of green energy technologies: The role of policies in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. International Journal of Green Energy, 14(14), 1192–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2017.1381612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Nyberg, D., De Cock, C., & Whiteman, G. (2013). Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization, 20(5), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4 ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yousaf, Z. (2021). Go for green: Green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: Accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14343-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar